What do you suppose the the reason for this?
. . . Is it just because he sucks?
![Mf Laughbounce2](images/smilies/modern/mf_laughbounce2.gif)
![](http://www.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_606w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2012/09/13/Others/Images/2012-09-13/r%204_1347559200.jpg)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...=nl_pmpolitics
Carter and Kerry both lead at this point. What happened? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
magic underwear?I hear you were at the DNC
. . . Are those the bright yellow ones with the cartoon characters?
Originally Posted by Fast Gunn
Bad week for Romney. No way around that fact.All of the Bloehard Repubes on this board seem to be all talk and no action. To a person they bloeviate repeatedly about how Obama will lose but other than Budman (who I do not consider to be one of the radicals) none have (openly) agreed to put their money where their mouth is.
Anybody want to take me up on my bet? All the crowing about the Middle East? Or is that just whistling past the grave yard? Originally Posted by TexTushHog
Bad week for Romney. No way around that fact.
Anybody want to take me up on my bet? All the crowing about the Middle East? Or is that just whistling past the grave yard? Originally Posted by TexTushHog
All of the Bloehard Repubes on this board seem to be all talk and no action. To a person they bloeviate repeatedly about how Obama will lose but other than Budman (who I do not consider to be one of the radicals) none have (openly) agreed to put their money where their mouth is.
I followed up one of Whirly's ridiculous remarks with a 5 benji challenge and he "cut and run" faster than he could say he doesn't have the balls to bet on a sure loser like Mitt Gaffeney.
I have to give the idiot bloeviators credit. If I were them I would not bet on Mitt Gaffeney either. Apparently they are a "little smarter" than they appear.
Disclaimor: A "little smarter" but not by much! Originally Posted by bigtex