Around 2.2 Trillion needed...
http://www.asce.org/reportcard/
Around 2.2 Trillion needed...http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/76b51fd2-0...44feabdc0.html
http://www.asce.org/reportcard/ Originally Posted by SEE3772
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/76b51fd2-0...44feabdc0.htmlSounds loving!
http://thinkprogress.org/politics/20...aiting-action/
http://chicagoist.com/2012/09/06/cli...support_of.php Originally Posted by Sensia
The greatest threat this nation has isnt crumbling roads and bridges but the electrric grid.I think our crumbling infrastructure is just another symptom of the larger problem of the national debt. We have disguised the problem of deficit spending by under funding maintenance of the infrastructure. It's like the guy who lives extravagantly, while his house is disintegrating for lack of maintenance.
The electric grid is far beyond what is neede3d to support an kind of growth in our nation.
Much of the so called energy conservtion isnt to "save energy" but to put off upgrading the electrical grid.
The ability of power companies to be able to write off the cost if upgrading the grid is being killed by government regulations on caol and nkes.
These are by far the cheapest energy sources for electricty (not including cost of construction of nukes).
Wind will never be able to pay for the cost of new distributin due to the high cost and low output.
Not much chance of building many hydro plants either unless it can be included in a watger storage system where surfaced water is the goal.
Super-conductors are nowhere near commercially viable in use for transmission lines as of yet. The extremely high cost of placing distribution lines underground also makes it less feasible.
The vast majority of our roads and bridges are not the responsibility of the federal government but of the local governemts. If we did things the way it should be done, the state would collect the taxes, fund their own requirements, and then send a portion to the federal government for the things that are required under the constitution. Originally Posted by The2Dogs
That's not "infrastructure" ... those are upgraded cow paths. Originally Posted by LexusLoverPretty much. But I've spent several weeks this past year in rural areas of Tuscany and Burgundy that are less populated than my niche of far NE Texas. And the roads in those communities are great impaired to our roads. Not to mention easy train service to Florence or Beaune and points beyond. I had a colleague who said much the same bout roads in the UK. Those roads would have been glorified cow paths 50years ago, too whereas our roads were better 50 years ago. Now it's reversed. Sad!
Pretty much. But I've spent several weeks this past year in rural areas of Tuscany and Burgundy that are less populated than my niche of far NE Texas. And the roads in those communities are great impaired to our roads. Not to mention easy train service to Florence or Beaune and points beyond. I had a colleague who said much the same bout roads in the UK. Those roads would have been glorified cow paths 50years ago, too whereas our roads were better 50 years ago. Now it's reversed. Sad! Originally Posted by TexTushHogFreudian slips aren't just available at Victoria's Secret.