**GALLUP SHOCK** Romney Up 52-45% Among Early Voters

joe bloe's Avatar
Romney's momentum appears to be continuing. I like the sound of the phrase, former president, Barack Obama.

**GALLUP SHOCK** Romney Up 52-45% Among Early Voters




by John Nolte 29 Oct 2012, 5:25 PM PDT
Very early on, before this campaign started in earnest, live or die, I publicly cast my lot with Gallup and Rasmussen. As a poll addict going back to 2000, these are the outlets that have always played it straight. It's got nothing to do with politics and everything to do with credibility and not wanting to kid myself. So when an outlet like Gallup tells me Romney is up seven-points, 52-45%, among those who have already voted, that's very big news.
Just as Gallup did with their bombshell survey showing that 2012 is looking like a year where Republicans will enjoy a record three-point turnout advantage over Democrats (a ten-point shift from 2008), for whatever reason, they buried the lede with this latest bombshell, as well. When you consider the fact that the CorruptMedia's been talking for weeks about how Obama's crushing Romney in early voting, you would think Gallup proving that Narrative a big fat phony lie would be news. Instead, though, they bury this explosive news at the bottom of a piece headlined: "In U.S., 15% of Registered Voters Have Already Cast Ballots".
Sounds like a nothing story, right?
Except waaaaay at the bottom we learn this:
Thus far, early voters do not seem to be swaying the election toward either candidate.
Romney currently leads Obama 52% to 45% among voters who say they have already cast their ballots. However, that is comparable to Romney's 51% to 46% lead among all likely voters in Gallup's Oct. 22-28 tracking polling. At the same time, the race is tied at 49% among those who have not yet voted but still intend to vote early, suggesting these voters could cause the race to tighten. However, Romney leads 51% to 45% among the much larger group of voters who plan to vote on Election Day, Nov. 6.
When Gallup says early voters don’t seem to be swaying the election, presumably what they means is that because Romney is ahead by five points nationally, an early voting advantage of seven-points isn't going to "sway the election."
Romney's early voting lead in Gallup may not jive with the CorruptMedia narrative, but it does with actual early vote totals that have been released and show Romney's early vote totals either beating Obama in swing states such as Colorado and Florida or chipping away at the President's advantage in the others. For example, here's what we know about Ohio's early voting numbers, thus far:
But here is what we do know: 220,000 fewer Democrats have voted early in Ohio compared with 2008. And 30,000 more Republicans have cast their ballots compared with four years ago. That is a 250,000-vote net increase for a state Obama won by 260,000 votes in 2008.
Something else in this Gallup survey also helps shed some light on what we're seeing in these sometimes counter-intuitive state polls. As the headline states, Gallup is showing that only 15% of the public has already voted. Moreover, they've broken down early voting by region and show that in the Midwest only 13% of voters have already voted. And yet, many polls in places like Ohio show a much higher percentage of early voters, some as high as 30%, which you can bet skews the data. In other words, those polls can't be correct.
Other than the fact that this is Gallup, another reason to embrace this poll is due to its very large sample size of 3,312 registered voters.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...h-early-voters
Yssup Rider's Avatar
15%? That's an I credibly small number with a week to go.

Highest numbers in the WEST? Like California? Washington? Oregon? I spoze those states will all flip now that old folks are voting early.

Dont you realize that's like early vote being down in Mississsippi.

Fucking idiots.

Hunker down, righties. This shit will be over soon.
tttalinky's Avatar
Somehow this is all President G.W.Bush's fault!
Yssup Rider's Avatar
The economy? the wars? the decline in American education? The obliteration of personal privacy? The forced injection of Jesus into public schools?

the old man? Partially.

The idiot bastard son?

Yep.

BTW -- what the fuck are you talking about?
Who is counting early votes??LOL
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Exit polling with liars.

Value=DICK!

Fucking idiots grasping at straws. BIG SURPRISE!
The right was LTAO about this when it was posted Obie was ahead.
Thanks EKIM for reminding us that "the right" was correct in being doubtful of the polls showing an Obama lead...............as we know, those polls significantly oversampled Democrats, Democrat enthusiasm, and Democrat turnout.


The right was LTAO about this when it was posted Obie was ahead. Originally Posted by ekim008
joe bloe's Avatar
Thanks EKIM for reminding us that "the right" was correct in being doubtful of the polls showing an Obama lead...............as we know, those polls significantly oversampled Democrats, Democrat enthusiasm, and Democrat turnout. Originally Posted by Whirlaway
The most important point of the story is that Republicans are likely to get out the vote at a higher rate than Democrats. The poll takers have known this for months. Unfortunately, they are only now, beginning to poll based on that knowledge.

For several months, the vast majority of polls were based on the assumption that Democratic voter turnout would be at 2008 levels or higher. This was done in spite of the fact that voter enthusiasm polling data showed that Republicans were much more eager to vote. The mid term elections in 2010 were also an indication that the polical climate was much more favorable to Republicans.

Most polls are rigged in favor of Democrats. Correcting the sample size ratio (Democrat vs Republican) in the final days before the election, is simply done to salvage the reputation of the polling company. The poll takers are only judged on the accuracy of their prediction of the final outcome.

The reason for rigging the polls for the Democrats, for months on end, was to create the impression that Obama's victory was inevitible, that Romney was a lost cause. Many people will not donate to a lost cause.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-30-2012, 09:51 AM
Anybody that knows anything about this election knows that it only counts in Ohio.

Obama will carry that state and will be reelected.

Who cares how many votes each person gets on the whole. It is a dash to 270.

Not a beauty contest to see who gets the most votes nationally.
Anybody that knows anything about this election knows that it only counts in Ohio.

Obama will carry that state and will be reelected.

Who cares how many votes each person gets on the whole. It is a dash to 270.

Not a beauty contest to see who gets the most votes nationally. Originally Posted by WDF

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

you ignorant turds make this victory even sweeter........you butt-fucking monkeys don't even know that in 7 days the Tea Party is gonna shove it up your ass, dry......your disbelief will make it more entertaining......I will be front and center to laugh at you......


WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-30-2012, 10:24 AM
in 7 days the Tea Party is gonna shove it up your ass, dry


I will be front and center to laugh at you...... Originally Posted by ChoomCzar

.

Make sure and take it out of your mouth first!
.

Make sure and take it out of your mouth first! Originally Posted by WDF
HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! I can tell you're not gonna like the election results at all! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! .....this election will just prove how stupid you butt-fucking monkeys are.......


Where is the confidence in your lord and messiah? Will you follow him into his Hawaiian exile? or will you deny him three times?........

<----- a little violin music to go with your whine-n-cheese........
Thanks EKIM for reminding us that "the right" was correct in being doubtful of the polls showing an Obama lead...............as we know, those polls significantly oversampled Democrats, Democrat enthusiasm, and Democrat turnout. Originally Posted by Whirlaway


It just shows what idiots cling to hope.
Thanks EKIM for reminding us that "the right" was correct in being doubtful of the polls showing an Obama lead...............as we know, those polls significantly oversampled Democrats, Democrat enthusiasm, and Democrat turnout. Originally Posted by Whirlaway
And the Gallup poll that is the subject of this post notes in the body of it's discussion that the early voting polling is skewed towards Republicans for a variety of reasons. It's mostly from Western states, it's mostly older people who vote early...in other words, republicans. And so on....

Here is how Gallup, not that dead guy Breitbart, characterized the "meaning" of their own poll:

"However, despite the hype, it doesn't appear that early voting will have a major impact on the U.S. popular vote, or be much more prevalent than it was four years ago."

In other words, the entire OP is nothing but Breitbart spin and bullshit....as usual. If you go to the source and actually read it, it says nothing along the lines of what is contained in the Breitbart post. So..more of the same....lies, propaganda and bullshit.