I have been in this hobby off and on for a few years, and I have an observation I think is worthy of discussion ... perhaps because I am way off-base on this, or perhaps because the ladies need to hear a contrasting opinion from time to time.
No longer being a young, flat-bellied whippersnapper, the hobby is not a quest for jackhammering opportunities. It might have been years back, but nowadays for me it's every bit as much about the companionship and kindnesses as it is about the acronyms. So I much prefer fewer, longer appointments than more frequent, shorter ones.
Now, realizing as we all do that we do not pay for specific activities, but rather we pay for the provider's time -- and by the way, guys I would urge you all to take that literally and not just with a wink. I've found the mileage is way better when the chemistry is great, because I allowed the provider to decide what (if anything) we were going to do BCD. I have had a few dates that involved zero BCD and in those instances it was just fine with me.
So here's my point: ladies, you should consider what you are communicating with your pricing vs. time strategies. For example, if you charge 100 for 30 minutes, 200 for 60 minutes and 300 for 90 minutes, don't complain when you become a high volume provider and you don't get many 60 or 90 minute appointments. You are telling guys that you are a one-act specialist. Just do me and leave. That is what it appears you want.
Those who took economics in college will recall the concept of declining marginal utility. Remember that if you are dying of thirst, the first glass of water might be worth $1,000 to you. Each succeeding glass of water becomes less and less valuable as you become less and less thirsty. Eventually the nth glass of water is worth zero, or even less than zero when you consider you have to store it if you aren't going to consume it right away. This principle most definitely comes into play in this hobby.
I like multi-hour arrangements. If you want to encourage me, you should create a pricing structure that declines in price at the margin. For example, 200 for the first hour, 150 for the second hour, 100 additional for every additional hour up to the fifth hour, and 50 for every additional hour up to the twelfth hour. Now that encourages guys who value quality dates and communicates that you are a lower volume provider. And it gets you to an overnight rate of 1000, for 12 hrs. Using the same logic, the 24 hour rate should be something like 1500, and the weekly rate should be something like 5000. That's how a businesswoman would think if she wants to be a lower volume provider, dealing with increasingly well-to-do clients.
I also see pricing incongruities because obviously some providers have never thought of this. Guys, we've all seen them. For example, 150 for 30 minutes, 225 for 60 minutes, 350 for 90 minutes, 500 for 120 minutes. Broken down, that means the first 30 is worth 150, the next is worth 75, the third is worth 125, and the fourth is worth 150 again. Kinda silly, but you see stuff like that all the time. In this example, the hobbyist will conclude that you want 60 minute appointments. You are pricing to avoid the longer ones.
I know, this is an esoteric point. I should just take advantage of the weaknesses in each provider's pricing structure. Certainly the guys who are still in the jackhammering business are doing that.
But I guess the economist in me wants to teach providers the concept of diminishing returns .... and when you consider us older hobbyists and our physical limitations ... aren't the longer appointments what you really want?
Just my $0.02.