OFA donors who give $500,000 get quarterly meetings with Obama

So, do you STILL think Obama gives a damn about you? Really?

From the article:

MSNBC’s Chuck Todd criticized Monday the new fundraising efforts of President Obama’s dark money group, Organizing for Action, calling a scheme for high donors to meet regularly with Obama “the definition of selling access.”

Todd was describing the quarterly meetings that will be enjoyed by OFA’s $500,000 donors, the New York Times reported over the weekend:

But those contributions will also translate into access, according to donors courted by the president’s aides. Next month, Organizing for Action will hold a “founders summit” at a hotel near the White House, where donors paying $50,000 each will mingle with Mr. Obama’s former campaign manager, Jim Messina, and Mr. Carson, who previously led the White House Office of Public Engagement.

Giving or raising $500,000 or more puts donors on a national advisory board for Mr. Obama’s group and the privilege of attending quarterly meetings with the president, along with other meetings at the White House. Moreover, the new cash demands on Mr. Obama’s top donors and bundlers come as many of them are angling for appointments to administration jobs or ambassadorships.

“This just looks bad–it looks like the White House is selling access,” Todd said Monday. “It’s the definition of selling access. If you believe money has a strangle hold over the entire political system this is ceding the moral high ground.”

The perk was first reported by the Los Angeles Times earlier in February after a meeting between OFA leadership and top Los Angeles and Bay Area fundraisers for Obama’s reelection campaign.

OFA is a tax-exempt 501(c)(4) and therefore not required to disclose the identities of its donors, nor the amounts they give. In addition to major campaign donors, the organization’s leadership has been courting corporate donors.

Selling access to corporate donors. So who's side do you think Obama is really on? Not yours. Not mine. Yup, you got it. The rich, corporations and banks. Politics as usual. C'mon, libs. Let's hear you defend this.

http://freebeacon.com/chuck-todd-on-...ust-looks-bad/

...meetings with Obama and a $100 Million "Clean Energy" loan.

That is a pretty good return on your investment. Set up a "green" company. Pay yourself an exorbitant amount of money. Live a lavish lifestyle and let it go bankrupt. Pocket a big ass payday and line up for the next "gift".

Anybody want to take an over under on what the Obamas will be worth within a year of leaving office?

His oldest daughter is already writing a book: "Greens of my father."

Yet none of you numb nuts are for limiting campaign contributions!

Yet none of you numb nuts are for limiting campaign contributions!



Originally Posted by WTF

I am.

I do not favor limiting contributions from individuals, but I do favor real time disclosure of the source and amount.

But the question is begged, if one does not favor limiting contributions, how does that mean s/he must at the same time not be offended by the obvious sale on access to the President? I thought he was President of all, but only those who can pony up $500k can see him? And some of you are ok with this. I know all Presidents do it. They should stop.