I don't really post much - but felt compelled to share, as most will be able to relate to this insight (by the way I think something along the same lines has been posted before - but perhaps not as well as I think this demonstrates the logic).
Purchasing or Leasing - which is better?
Many people cannot decide which is cheaper - purchasing or leasing..
I would like to help you decide by illustrating two charming stories.
Purchasing
The maths on the Paul McCartney - Heather Mills divorce was as follows:
After 5 years of marriage, he paid her $49 million.
Assuming he had sex with her every night during their 5 year relationship
It ended up with him purchasing her @ $26,849 per time.
This is Heather...
First Pic.jpg
Leasing
On the other hand,
New York Governor Eliot Spitzer's favourite hooker, Kristen,
Charged $4,000 per night.
This is Kristen...
2nd pic.jpg
So, had Paul McCartney "employed" Kristen for 5 years @ $4,000 per night,
He would have paid only $7.3 million in total for sex every night.
This represents a $41.7 million saving for Eliot.
What a shrewd man Eliot is, compared to the ageing Beatle.
Further valuable benefits of this Leasing option are;
* a (real) 22 year old
* no need for coaxing / pleading / begging
* never a headache
* happily agrees to all technical requests
* no complaining
* no “Honey - please do this” lists
* has two legs
Best of all, she leaves and returns when asked.
All at 1/7th the cost and no legal fees.
What does Heather think about this Purchase v Lease conundrum?...
image003.jpg
Where would you rather be?...
image004.jpg
Sometimes Leasing just makes more sense.
THE OLD ADAGE STILL HOLDS TRUE.....IF IT FLYS, FUCKS, OR FLOATS.............
RENT IT!