Review: Dont accept your invite to the PJ Party

Date: 3/1/13
Provider: Rachel
Phone: 850-375-0297
Email Address: NA
URL / Website: http://biloxi.backpage.com/BodyRubs/...eek-30/4475790
City: Biloxi
State: Mississippi
Address: her apartment
Appointment Type: Incall
Activities: Painful "therapeutic" massage, and
SPEED HJ
Session Length: 60
Fee: $100
Hair Length and Color: Long smokey dark hair (the hair you would see on someone from Twisted Sister with the same smell)
Age: late 40's
Smoking Status: Smoker
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: Ha, well her pictures arent good but they are for sure the best pictures she's EVER taken. She is dog ugly...her Marlboro smoke is so thick on her I felt like I was sitting in a booth at The Waffle House right after an AA meeting let out and they showed up at WH for a $1 cup of infinity coffee. She looks like she could make a great pipe fitter (not to offend any p.f.'s) at Ingalls and her hands are as rough as a mason (brick layer not the super secret group.
Recommendation: No

Ha, if I wouldve waited a few days I couldve seen the bad review that is posted...Take our advice...stay away!

Your review is a JOKE! I have gone to see Rachel and she is BEAUTIFUL, as well as a wonderful masseuse. The rates are affordable and I go regularly because I always am able to relax and have an enjoyable massage. I give a 5 star rating. As for tattooonmybutt (what a name by the way!) he should go to more AA meetings and get cleaned up before writing something as demeaning and ridiculous as his review. In fact, he was probably drunk when he wrote his review.

Why don't you do a review then and share your experience.

The review is more than 30 days old, so newbie OG$$$, you have violated ECCIE rules by posting your response. I suspect the mods will close this and do a bit of investigating to see who OG$$$ really is.

Jag

As in response and regards to yesterday, I just signed up for this site and have been basically browsing to get a feel for the site. I decided to reply to this review because I thought anyone could reply to a review. I am a client of this massage service and was appalled with the comments about Rachel. I had no idea I would be chastised for making a reply just because it doesn't meet a certain time period. How is this site supposed to say in business if you have rules like that? It doesn't inspire me to pay for a membership package to write reviews. I feel if I did that I would be attacked through words on my reviews as well.

Yes, as JAG said, it is against ECCIE rules to post in a review thread that has been idle over 30 days since the last post. This one has been idle for half a year!

Review are based on the reviewers point of view and any two people may see things quite differently, but they are still entitled to their own opinion of how things went. Insulting members because you disagree with them is also against the rules and not a very good way to make a first post on ECCIE!

As in response and regards to yesterday, I just signed up for this site and have been basically browsing to get a feel for the site. I decided to reply to this review because I thought anyone could reply to a review. I am a client of this massage service and was appalled with the comments about Rachel. I had no idea I would be chastised for making a reply just because it doesn't meet a certain time period. How is this site supposed to say in business if you have rules like that? It doesn't inspire me to pay for a membership package to write reviews. I feel if I did that I would be attacked through words on my reviews as well. Originally Posted by OlderGent$$$

There are a variety of reasons why old reviews should not be posted in. One is because providers often change their services over time, so a post of how a provider is now, is not indicative of how it might've been for another reviewer long ago. Second is so that guys don't post in reviews just to force them to the top of the forum and make them more visible. Some do it to keep their favorites at the top and a vindictive reviewer might do it to keep a bad review at the top. By posting now in this thread you have resurrected a review that was long forgotten and will now be read all over again as the newest post in the review forum (more harm than good)!

If you have seen her, your best option would be to post a new review of your own. It doesn't require any special access or payment to post reviews - any guy with an account qualifies as a reviewer! There is no reason for newbie reviewers to be attacked just because they have a difference of opinion, however many would view your comments as an attack on another member, so it would not be unexpected for you to get a few negative responses!