Providers looking like their pic

I wish providers would look like their pics. I have only ever seen one provider that met or exceeded their pic and that was Viv Landers!!!!!!! Viv looked a little like, not as good but pretty damn close, Olivia Wilde with very large D's if not DD's, flat stomach, and a great ass. I did an experiment, I took a pic of myself, with my shirt off, at the worst possible angle, pushed my belly out a little, and slummped over just a bit, then I twisted, flexed my stomach so my abs would show, flexed arms and chest and then took another pic. I showed some people my before and after pictures and everyone was WOW, how long have you been working out to get those results. I said that was a time frame of about 5 minutes!!! I know you can make yourself look a lot better than you really do but I would just like to see at the door what I'm expecting. Tired of out dated pics, not real pics, and the twist, streach, and hide pics. Just be real and let me decide, but what do I know because these lady's are busy with all you guys out there. You are either afraid to give an honest review because maybe she won't see you again, or maybe you get a discount for the "streached truth" about appearance. I don't care if you are a fat ugly guy, we can all agree on what a hot, average, or below average girl is with a little greying of the lines. I would like to see reviews on the "how I met your mother" scale. How about the bikini at the beach scale? If you saw said provider at the beach with all the other girls, how would she rate against them? that's how I wish reviews were done. This doesn't mean she wasn't great or nice or extremely good at what she does, it just means she isn't as hot as the pic she posts!

I "see" your pain !

I know there are others out there that look like thier pics if not better

My fave , and cutest one doesn't have any pics , wonderful surprise !

Daddys girl, I'm sure you are one of them, and your pics do look good, especially the boob pics, but do tell who else you think fits the bill. This is one reason I like strip clubs because you can actually see what you are buying. the trick in a strip club is they want you to buy whats behind either curtain 1, 2, or 3. Unless you are on your game, you will spend and not get what you think.

Trees could and may make long list of providers who look better than their pics and only-ever-seen-one by Austx is overstatement, and leads to false conclusion that the provider will be uglier or less appealing than her pics. Nope, not at least with the young ones. Sure, older providers use dated pics and are often disappointing even deceiving and one reason Trees focuses on the younger set in this hobby phase.

Trees will cast wider net and see providers in the 25-35 age range and will thanks to your post, pay attention to issue you raised.

Conclusion as of now: Trees thinks you wrong but need more data before you roundly disproven. Thanks for post...

19Trees

I deeply regret missing seeing Viv Landers

Qziz, knowing just how awesome she was, I deeply regret it for you!! I just can't say enough about Viv and her increadible look from head to toe!

Trees, there were two providers that I was WOWed by when I opened the door but this was when they didn't have any pics so I don't think that counts. I'm just saying, the providers that I have seen have never lived up to their pic other than Viv. I don't do FS but even when I have seen a heavy girl just to play with her huge tits, when I get there, she is freaking a lot bigger than her pics show. I probably still would've gone to play with those huge tits with a real pic but I just don't like opening the door and then having a look on my face of "oh shit" that Im sure they can see.

I'm not going to say you are wrong because obviously beauty is subjective to the beholder. Therefore what you my view as less than attractive, or even not matching the desired expectations, based on a pic, I (or others) may indeed find said provider to meet and even exceed my (or our) expectations.

Having said that, I do agree that no showcase should contain pics that are over a year old without the pic stating such. We all change and in keeping with my statement above, what one finds unattractive, another will find attractive.

I've seen Monica Austin and AngelPie, two ladies on completely opposite ends of the "figure" spectrum, and enjoyed both. One of the things that attracted me to Monica was the fact that she does not hide who she is. Nope, she's not the 100 lb. spinner Mandy (AKA:AnglePie) is, but she is all woman and confident in who she is. That's attractive to me. Providers who hide their weight usually don't get a second glance from me.

I could be wrong here, but I'm pretty confident that this plays a larger role in the overall scope of the whole picture deception thing; I think one of the main factors is low self-esteem on the part of both providers and clients. Providers hide behind outdated pics because they don't want to be thought of in a negative light and clients, in an effort to "whatever" (I tend to think it leans more toward making themselves feel better) will trash a curvy girl or a BBW girl when they themselves could stand to lose 50+ lbs. their own self. I guess I just like people to be who they are. You're not going to please everyone, but you catch more flies with honey than vinegar, so just be honest in your pics.

Hmmmm...generally my experience has been they look even better than their pictures...not true in all cases but for me it has been.

Trees could and may make long list of providers who look better than their pics and only-ever-seen-one by Austx is overstatement, and leads to false conclusion that the provider will be uglier or less appealing than her pics. Nope, not at least with the young ones. Sure, older providers use dated pics and are often disappointing even deceiving and one reason Trees focuses on the younger set in this hobby phase.

Trees will cast wider net and see providers in the 25-35 age range and will thanks to your post, pay attention to issue you raised.

Conclusion as of now: Trees thinks you wrong but need more data before you roundly disproven. Thanks for post...

19Trees Originally Posted by 19Trees

No false conclusion here, 8 out of 10 girls will be less appealing than their pics.


Rocker

I know there are others out there that look like thier pics if not better Originally Posted by Daddys Girl

Yes you do!

I would say one of the only providers that I thought actually looked BETTER than their pics in person (and there were no face pics btw, so this is only referring to her body) was Sweet Jasmine out of Houston. I have only seen like 11 providers, so a very limited sample size... Perhaps Andy Wylde looked better in person too... Certainly she was much more "cut" than in her pics...so, yes, I think I would give Ms. Wylde the nod as well, so 2 out of 11. I think Dara is spot on to her pics...though her hair is not down to the middle of her back and is growing out to dark brown vs the long and black it used to be. So I give her props for matching her pics.

I don't want to disappoint anyone so what you see in my pics on here, my yahoogroup and anywhere are me. It is easier for me to be upfront about my looks and all then be a disappointment at the door for a guy. Photoshop is nice if used for background stuff but nt to change the appearance of the person. I would be really disappointed if a guy sent me a pic of a toned and buffed guy and he showed up totally different.

I think pictures should have no digital enhancements .....it is so easy nowadays to "stretch" the truth .......I love my body, embrace every curve and will not portrait myself less than an hourglass/curvy vixen ....