Here is an interesting article from msnbc.com about a study of johns and comparing their stats to other men who pay for sex and dont, etc.
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/51335501/n...lite=obnetwork
I wonder if ECCIE was used
sixx
you cant compare 1948 to 2013, women in 1948 were less likely to engage in premarital sex, nowadays I would would say over 80% in engage in it nowIronically, the sale of Sheep has died over on an equal swing as Hoogars have risen since the 40's. The Delta is almost null....
men had to see Hookers back in the day , girls were not giving it up Originally Posted by RALPHEY BOY
I was thinking about this the other day. I wonder what the studies would show if they did it in Europe or other places it was legal. If they have done studies where it was legal, I would like to compare them to the studies here. Either way, I think I would take the information with a grain of salt. Originally Posted by Scarlett RossiExactly...fact is WHY is it illegal? Sex is legal. Selling shit is legal. Why isn't selling sex be legal? Its legal in a part of Nevada (where Toyz has had the pleasure of visiting). Its considered common practice in Thailand & really IS like an exchange of a GFE for a bit of currency.
It's capitolism, supply and demand, things that make this country great yet we're outcasted as perverts because we use the economies of scale for personal satisfaction. Originally Posted by Sir Hardin ThickeIn a true capitalistic society, to the victor goes the spoils...ergo, a man can have whatever his means provide.