Maybe, maybe not....It wouldn't surprise me....
No matter the reasons why (tv ratings, stupidity, race, otherwise); the 2-stroke penalty was the wrong decision.
Tiger signed a wrong scorecard and should have been DQ'd - either by the rules committee, or by his withdrawal.
Ignorance of the Rules of Golf, or brain-freeze while playing isn't an "escape jail time" card.
By his own admission, Tiger tried to gain an advantage by breaking the drop rule.
By remaining in the tournament, Tiger (as well as the rules committee) demeaned the game.
Originally Posted by Whirlaway
Disclaimer: I'm no fan of Eldrick, as well documented here on this board and elsewhere.
The Masters Rules Committee should have addressed it with him while he was still on the course. If they had, the 2-stroke penalty should have been assessed for what was obviously a bad drop. At that point, signing an improper scorecard, which should lead to a DQ, would be a moot point. I think they didn't because of who he is. The exact same footage was used to first say there was no problem with the drop, then again to assess the penalty. The committee botched the call badly.
That being said, the bigger issue is his admission after the round that he moved the drop spot back 2 yards, to give him a better yardage for his 5th shot, thus creating an advantage for himself. Most of the stroke penalty rules and procedures of golf are to inhibit a player from creating an advantage. He should have done the classy thing and withdrew.