LONDON NEWSPAPER REPORT OBAMA ADMINISTRATION IGNORED RUSSIAN REQUEST TO INVESTIGATE BOSTON BOMBER !

"Speculation is growing that one of the Boston bombers met a known Jihadist terrorist in 2011 - as it emerged the FBI failed to follow up on a Russian tip that he was seen with an Islamic militant six times...."

Wow. .

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2RCWIpcWw
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

London newspaper? How about a grocery store tabloid along the lines of the National Enquirer? You even lie in your headline from that rag!

You really don't vet your sources at all, do you Churlie? as long as there's an anti-Obama spin, you're good with it, even If its a FOREIGN rag.

You shouldn't wonder why you are the laughingstock of ECCIE!

From the paper quote:

"Speculation is growing that one of the Boston bombers met a known Jihadist terrorist in 2011 - as it emerged the FBI failed to follow up on a Russian tip that he was seen with an Islamic militant six times."


What about "Russia Asked FBI To Investigate".............don't you comprehend ?

And the laughingstock of the Sandbox is AssUp...it was voted on and you won by a landslide; beating out all the competition, myself included.............you got more votes than everyone combined !

Now that is something to laugh about....!

Bretfart will come out with a quote soon..

Obviously we struck a nerve there, you lying sack of shit. You had to post two insulting posts. Indicates to me that you're basically stuttering and foaming at the mouth again.

You have no credibility Whirlyturd. You post ANYTHING that is anti-American and EVERYTHING that's anti-OBAMA with total disregard for facts, proof or truth.

As sure as the sun will rise, you will be posting hatred.

You didn't even wait for the smoke to clear in Boston before you were attacking Obama. You were similarly compassionate on Sandy Hook.

Call me all the names you like, but if there's anyone on ECCIE who bears investigation, it's you.

You're as anti-American as any jihadist, and should be on someone's list, if you're not already.

Of course you want to "investigate" people who call attention to Obama's failures; your the sick Obama cultist, not me..............

Your call for investigations has a long long list; Drudge, Breitbart, Powerline, Daily Mail, The Post, and on and on................

You sound like the White House yammering about the media...............Investigat e your opposition; sounds worse than Nixon...at least tricky Dick knew to keep his paranoia a secret, but you Obama cultist are openly call for "investigations" of people who oppose you......your the anti-american, anti democracy idiot.

What's next ?

Assup calls to round up the anti-Obama Americans.......!

No doubt.....police state here we come if the Obama cultist have their way.

WACKO....................The List.........typical leftist...........

You're as anti-American as any jihadist, and should be on someone's list, if you're not already. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

London newspaper? How about a grocery store tabloid along the lines of the National Enquirer? You even lie in your headline from that rag! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

What's the big deal about it being a foreign tabloid. They might not as reputable as the Times of London, but what if it is true? You just set yourself up.

They ridiculed Drudge when he first reported on Monica Lewinsky. They stopped laughing when, you know, it turned out to be true...

London newspaper? How about a grocery store tabloid along the lines of the National Enquirer?! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

The Daily Mail is a mainstream paper which is read by the middle/lower classes and is right of centre.

I disagree with a lot of what it says, but it is in no way a National Enquirer. It is as reputable as any mainstream paper (which isn't saying a lot).

"Speculation is growing that one of the Boston bombers met a known Jihadist terrorist in 2011 - as it emerged the FBI failed to follow up on a Russian tip that he was seen with an Islamic militant six times...."

Wow. .

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz2RCWIpcWw
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook Originally Posted by Whirlaway

the title of the thread is completely wrong ... theres your problem sport. The FBI didn't fail to investigate the man ... observe

The FBI acknowledged Friday that it had investigated Tsarnaev in 2011, even interviewing him and his family, but “did not find any terrorism activity,” either domestic or foreign.
“The FBI had this guy on the radar and somehow he fell off,” said the congressional aide, who said oversight committees on Capitol Hill are seeking answers from counterterrorism officials. “We heard for several days leading up to this there was no intelligence. Now we know there could have been intelligence.

This story was reported on plenty in U S papers with the same detail. Whirlyaway has to go find a UK paper that got it wrong.

whirlie's motto


when only the wrong story will do

What's the big deal about it being a foreign tabloid. They might not as reputable as the Times of London, but what if it is true? You just set yourself up.

They ridiculed Drudge when he first reported on Monica Lewinsky. They stopped laughing when, you know, it turned out to be true... Originally Posted by ExNYer

Even a blind nut can find a squirrel evey now and again. Whirly's uses some comic source's more often than not. Most of which distort the truth. If the FBI in fact messed up, maybe Whirly and friends will defend Obama just like they have defended Bush and his CIA yellow cake crap!