I would posit that...
Originally Posted by jbravo_123
I'd posit you don't really know much about it bro.
I hate it when this happens but I can't find a single dictionary that will give me a definition of
mutilate that applies easily to breast augmentation. Nothing is removed, ravaged, folded, spindled or (let's face it) mutilated. Interestingly I still don't have difficulty thinking of it that way. But that's a world-view thing and technically mya is correct.
S. Thom is pleAseD to announce thAt the proceDure actually AugmenteD nipple sensitivity. Happy for her, too! But her worry that it might not was for a good reason -- sometimes it don't. She risked that voluntarily. If I could buy a great big, fine looking penis that would firm up anytime I wanted (not to mention making me look great in a bikini!) but there was this possibility that it would be "dead" as a door knocker -- no number of (big burly handsome) orderlies could get me in the OR. (Yeah I know, her nipples aren't her clit, so it's not exactly equivalent. Just related.)
So, no one asked me (and risking verbosity) but here's my word to sweet mya of the fine ass and small titties:
Think one size up. I'm beggin ya. Even if you have an A, a full B is scientifically proven to be most men's favorite. If you're a soft B, a great set of natural looking C's is every model's dream. And tell your surgeon that nipple sensitivity is a high priority...as jbrav pointed out, methods matter.