I have been on here awhile, and I i have read many reviews good and bad...Verified Girls are 99% good and BP Girls are 50% bad. The numbers speak for themselves. Two part question; Why wouldn't you stick with a verified provider? 2nd part....why wouldn't a provider want to join eccie to become verified? It appears you gain more respect, better clientele, people feel more comfortable with you. You establish regulars that have money and don't play games. Just curious what others thought.
Originally Posted by mcgraw69
I have to agree with OsD that your numbers are exaggerated. I would guess that VPs have an edge, but I think that can be explained simply in that that they might be more computer literate.
Also, VPs have an edge because the pool is smaller. Sure, you'll get 99% positive in spurts, but for a three week period, 85% of that 99% is everybody knocking on the new flavor's door. On BP, one girl isn't going to get as much attention here. But one neg BP review and everyone piles on.
In many cases the same girls use both, muting the point.
Your last thoughts are the recipe for success and easier said than done.
Final point, if it was just a matter of safety, why wouldn't we just nail the SO? We're fucked up horndogs that thrill in the hunt for strange. And BP has more strange.
The VP status is not quite the Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval, but at least it screens out most fly-by-night operators.
Originally Posted by jackfengshui
All it takes to be a VP is an email, phone, and a John that says 'yes'. I could be one by Wednesday, if not sooner. eccie advises vp status is no endorsement of safety.