So if someone accuses me of something I know nothing about, "rule 17" prohibits me from looking into it?...Because I'm seeking to gather ideas about that which I have been accused, I am therefore on a "cyber stalk"?
Well then...I don't want to get in trouble, so if you would be kind enough to just LMK who the members of the "small group" are, I will be on my way.
Originally Posted by malwoody
With the round and round some of you have been having and with a loose interpretation of the rules, I could make an arguement that in the threads rules 1,3,4,6,7,8,13, and 17 have been violated.
1.) Each side has made comments in new threads to provoke the others when the topic didnt involve the spat.
3.) It has been pretty obvious not much respect has been shown lately.
4.) Insults and personal threats have certainly happened.
6.) Many topics have been derailed because of the spats. Although you have at least started some new threads for it including this one.
7.) Supposedly there has been threats of bodily harm.
8,) I dont know the details, but supposedly PMs have been sent that certainly are not positive so I would say they are harassing PMs.
13.) Sure it was on accident, but there was a rule 13 violation just a few hours ago.
17.) Both sides seem to follow eachother into every thread to comment. It is a very loose use of the rule, but you cant tell me that there are not guys just waiting for the other guys to post. I do admit that I posted it as a half joke. Its not stalking if both sides are following each other.