Stessed out by a BP ad

Caption reads :

Destress with a sexy, mature, down to earth woman (incall only) - 42

http://buffalo.backpage.com/FemaleEs...ly-42/10750988

Then I looked at the pics and became very stressed at this pic she posted :



but then I thought :

Attachment 229977


and : Attachment 229978

LMFAO, yeah that pic is a lil disturbing. So, the "physical appearance" section of a review would read something like, she has stretch marks that are QUITE DISTRACTING!!!!

I wouldn't discourage providers from being honest and forthcoming.
There are always a bunch of people into everything you can imagine.

I doubt the pic is fake, lol

No hits on tineye

But can she suck a golf ball through a garden hose? Ijs

LMFAO, yeah that pic is a lil disturbing. So, the "physical appearance" section of a review would read something like, she has stretch marks that are QUITE DISTRACTING!!!! Originally Posted by mad469s

But in reality most people will end up saying flat tummy no signs of stretch marks hahaha

You gain pleasure from bashing a woman's ad????



What is disturbing to me is that this behavior from hobbyists is becoming quite a trend.

I know I look better in clothes vs. naked... and I love a woman to wear some sexy clothing throughout a session (certain access available, of course). If she's attractive enough and sexy, this wouldn't bother me...

I wouldn't discourage providers from being honest and forthcoming.
There are always a bunch of people into everything you can imagine. Originally Posted by Lexxxy

I appreciate the honesty in the post that's why I said different strokes for different folks. I'm sure there must be a fetish for this.

I wouldn't discourage providers from being honest and forthcoming.
There are always a bunch of people into everything you can imagine. Originally Posted by Lexxxy

I appreciate the honesty in the post that's why I said different strokes for different folks. Besides it saved me a trip.

You gain pleasure from bashing a woman's ad????



What is disturbing to me is that this behavior from hobbyists is becoming quite a trend. Originally Posted by SweetElizabeth

Not bashing, just making a point that she must've failed marketing 101 , she should be trying to portray her best attributes or post no pics at all.

Ya know, the thing is she might be a gem. We've all seen women who have been encouraged to join Eccie. Obtain new pics, etc etc. Give the girl a break, man. You might wish to consider portraying some of your own better attributes.

I wouldn't discourage providers from being honest and forthcoming.
There are always a bunch of people into everything you can imagine. Originally Posted by Lexxxy

At least she isn't using stolen pics like most gals on BP. She looks ok to me actually.

Ya know, the thing is she might be a gem. We've all seen women who have been encouraged to join Eccie. Obtain new pics, etc etc. Give the girl a break, man. You might wish to consider portraying some of your own better attributes. Originally Posted by SweetElizabeth

Here's some of my better attributes :

Front

Attachment 230829

Back

Attachment 230830

Happy retirement, don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.

I appreciate the honesty in the post that's why I said different strokes for different folks. Besides it saved me a trip.



Not bashing, just making a point that she must've failed marketing 101 , she should be trying to portray her best attributes or post no pics at all. Originally Posted by cravenmorehead

She failed dishonest capitalism 101, or should I say American Business 101. She saved you a trip, but it sounds like you didn't want her to.