TO PEE OR NOT TO PEE?

I have a job. I work, they pay me. I pay my taxes & the government distributes my taxes as it sees fit.

In order to get that paycheck, in my case, I am required to pass a random urine test (with which I have no problem). I am seriously required to have one taken on a random basis, as many times a year as they want or see fit. ( Still I have no problem with this)

What I do have a problem with is the distribution of my taxes to people who don't have to pass a urine test.

So, here is my question: Shouldn't one have to pass a urine test to get a welfare check because I have to pass one to earn it for them?

Please understand, I have no problem with helping people get back on their feet. I do, on the other hand, have a problem with helping someone sitting on their BUTT----doing drugs while I work.

Can you imagine how much money each state would save if people had to pass a urine test to get a public assistance check?

I guess we could call the program "URINE OR YOU'RE OUT"!


IMO.... as always


P.S. Just a thought, all politicians should have to pass a urine test too!

i think its a good point and valid. if onehad to take a urine test to get govt aide, im sure thered be a decline. buuut, im sure someone would figure a way to get over the system as well.

all politicians should have to pass a urine test too! Originally Posted by lacanterra

Holy smokes!
What a great idea.
I love this more than I do term limits for all the elected bastards!

Scary,

It makes sense but would you make the kids of these folks take urine tests as well?

Tough call.

SF

Im a strong supporter of drug testing for public assistance, do the right thing, you dont get to have extra fun on the taxpayers dime.... on your own, thats your decision...

I love this idea!

Waste of money. Believe me, the scammers know how to beat the drug tests. You might get them once but the retest will be passed.

I usually try to be Devil's advocate, but I have no issues with this. Other than who is going to pay for the non random drug test.

We are... Don't we pay as Taxpayers for everything anyway? If it made a difference, then I have no problem with it being paid for by our taxes. It would pay for itself in a very short time.

I usually try to be Devil's advocate, but I have no issues with this. Other than who is going to pay for the non random drug test. Originally Posted by JJ

Good idea

Damn Icey... I just checked out your showcase.. Should be ICEY_HOT!!

I work out of Galveston, and of course pass thru Houston all the time.. I think I would like to stop by....

We are... Don't we pay as Taxpayers for everything anyway? If it made a difference, then I have no problem with it being paid for by our taxes. It would pay for itself in a very short time. Originally Posted by lacanterra

I agree.

Damn Icey... I just checked out your showcase.. Should be ICEY_HOT!!

I work out of Galveston, and of course pass thru Houston all the time.. I think I would like to stop by.... Originally Posted by lacanterra

Hands off Lacanterra. I saw her first! You can enjoy her when I'm good & done. She's gorgeous!

Hey Wicked......Hmmmm, Maybe... Just maybe I should have you both at the same time. I would share with you.

I might be in Houston before you.
and hopefully tell you how it tastes.

But being the kind of guy I am, I would wait for you.
Just a thought...






Hands off Lacanterra. I saw her first! You can enjoy her when I'm good & done. She's gorgeous![/quote]

Can I please watch, I will be a good boy and sit in the corner.
Then and only when asked I would like to join in LMAO

Your idea is nonsense. If your criteria for testing is people on goverment assistance, that includes all goverment employees, everyone on unemployment, all politicians, all military, and every employee of every company that works goverment contract..we can keep going with this.why not test everyone in the whole country!..complete nonsense!