Questionable review

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?...post1054528414

The above link is to a review and my response.
You will see my concerns and reasons for my calling it a bogus review.
I did a provider search for Lady V for my information and was led to a far different provider than is described. I did a search among SA providers and came up with someone who might be the Lady V described.
Either way, the 'review' has virtually no details.
It smells like BS to me, perhaps a self review.

Hope this does not meet with your displeasure, but BS is BS, and I think that something is wrong about this, either from the woman who posed as Lady V or the writer, or both. It may be one and the same.

Or I may have awakened on the wrong side of the bed ...

Any feedback from the mods is welcome.
Others can hold your peace.

At this time there is no way to definitively establish any nefarious intent.

Part of the problem is the reviewer posted the provider as Lady V.
The real LadyV PM'd me.
So the confusion might have been avoided had I done a more thorough search, BUT the reviewer should have gotten her name correct. My search of "Lady V" came up with the other provider I mentioned in my review-reply. Keeping it real and owning it. Just saying ...

Apparently no ill intent ... Just poor reviewing, IMNSHO.

Thanks for your reply.

I suggest the thread be closed.

Closed as requested by the OP.