Why wouldn't you see a spinner and why?

This thread is not written to bash or degrade any spinner type providers in any capacity. I like women of all shapes primarily and the hobby has afforded me the variety of trying different types of ladies. I know spinner usually garner far more interests inquiries in multiple cities. I know some have very good reviews, are "the better eat your wheaties" type, and seem to be more agile position wise than ladies of larger body types, I humbly invite those ladies to chime in and offer their perspective.

I will openly admit I prefer woman who are petite, average, thick in the ass, supple body and not too hard in places, curvy, or a combination of all those for my personal complete package no matter her body type. I'm not so big on breasts size but a B-Cup is more than enough. I more so prefer ladies who have cushion for the pushing in the right areas. More so their sexual stamina and frequency of it is what lures me in.

I recently saw in session the first of two or three spinners I plan to spend an 12 hour overnight with soon. Some local some touring. This places me out of the element of ladies I usually see, but these ladies are very curvy although they are small spinners. I was told by other hobbyists mostly spinners were not into full vaginal penetration with "gusto." Meaning you might could "hit an in park home run" but you could never really let loose "and knock a homerun out the park.".....so to speak. More so meaning spinners were almost never the type to say "fuck me harder" or "get it deeper" in session because most times anatomically they could not accommodate hobbyist right at or above average as their larger fellow providers could accommodate.

Here is my questions and I thought it might be beneficial to add a poll with common reasons I heard as to why most guys didn't venture. I typed them here just in case I did the poll wrong.

This poll is geared more the most pertinent reason or reasons toward why you wouldn't, wont see again, haven't, or cant see one. These were common answers I received from hobbyist in my same demographic (young aged 25 to 40, AA, and seeking a more "eat your wheaties" type session stamina) If you are not in this category thats ok, and I still welcome your input.

Can a mod make this poll anonynomous for me. I forgot to click that option as I don't want to potentially cock block anyone based on their honest vote.

interesting poll.

so gimme, you think there are issue in seeing spinners?

I don't have a problem seeing spinners. I guess the poll doesn't apply to me.

interesting poll.

so gimme, you think there are issue in seeing spinners?

I don't have a problem seeing spinners. I guess the poll doesn't apply to me. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

I don't have enough experience in the hobby or real life with spinners to know for sure if these are common issue they mostly have. I saw my first spinner and wrote a review and had reservations as to if the experience was for me.

I relied mostly on the intel I got from other hobbyist who shared my interests.

You are correct in reply that you don't have a problem seeing spinners. And the fact you DON'T have a problem omits the poll applying to you. But I do welcome your input if you had prior info before seeing your first spinner that mirrored the info I have I would appreciate you input.

I was mostly very curious and hope this thread is received well with honest opinions. Hopefully a few suggestions too to sway my concerns thus far since I have only seen a few so far in the hobby.

I could never really figure out the real definition of a spinner.

I personally have a very classic body type-- think Mad Men. I'm still petite, not hard bodied, but I also don't consider myself hefty. Voluptuous has some how morphed into a PC adjective that puts men off, but I always considered that a sexy word. But, imo this is how women should be for the most part, unless your body is naturally very tiny. Killing yourself for a body type that does not fit you is silly.

Can I take it deep? That all depends on how much work you've put in yourself. I personally can't fake that stuff-- so no kissing, straight to the blow job, and then a quickie will ensure that I will not be able to take too much man. It goes both ways, I have no idea why a man would spend a few hundred dollars and not participate in GFE full service. You might as well stay home and jerk off.

Obviously..... the poll doesn't have a reply suited to me either!
It's no secret that I enjoy spinners.... but I have several ATF's who fall well out of the range.

Gimme.... Good Luck with the poll.... but I really think it's about as politically correct as asking guys why they don't like fucking BBW's !

Sometimes.... "Don't Ask , Don't Tell " is the best policy....

Perhaps, if you had included a response, indicating zero aversion to spinners.... I believe you would arrive at a more "complete" sampling of opinion.

Giz

I could never really figure out the real definition of a spinner. Originally Posted by Jacquie

No definition needed really. But these links were all of what I consider spinners. Some are more curvy than others, but all in all based on their size, height, and weight you can definitely label them as a spinner without question. These are some of the ladies I'm considering seeing to know for sure if its for me or not.

Sassy

http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=412419&postcount=2

Eden Monet

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=95047

Miss America (I already saw and reviewed her here)

http://missamericaworldwide.com/Home_Page.html

What I would consider a close mix of spinner and petite would be ladies shaped like this.

Diayva:

http://www.eccie.net/eccie_showcase....preview&g=2187

But I wouldn't consider her a spinner due to her height although she has similar deminsions to spinners, she is taller and distributes them on a longer canvas. Definitely petite which seems to be the most commonly shaped providers available.

Not sometimes their are exceptions to the Height:

Taylor Foxx: is 5"3 but is curvy and definitively petite to me. Not a spinner.

http://www.eccie.net/eccie_showcase....preview&g=2472

Can I take it deep? That all depends on how much work you've put in yourself. I personally can't fake that stuff-- so no kissing, straight to the blow job, and then a quickie will ensure that I will not be able to take too much man. Originally Posted by Jacquie

I didn't think you would have an issue with size or taking it deep but you also aren't a spinner. So most times based on my experiences with ladies of your thicker type it is not an issue for them either way. Based on reports I heard about you they said you were not a spinner or petite persay.

But even if you were a spinner hypothetically in this scenario from the poll......would your vaginal capabilities totally be dependent upon the session and how you mesh? Is that a spinner consensus? I just don't see the difference as women in other body types petite to BBW I have seen rarely have issues with it with a few exceptions from time to time I'm sure. But I'm sure for the most part most client or at or below average length wise. So is a deeper GFE/BFE connection (blows raspberry) required for more equipt hobbyist in playtime for spinners primarily?

Mutual pleasure is what I seek when I see ladies, but if they were unsure prior to meeting me that size and the prospect of full vaginal penetration was an issue and they had to "sike" themselves up to it it still wouldn't make sense to me.

Thank you for your input. Its nice to have a ladies perspective.

Gimme.... Good Luck with the poll.... but I really think it's about as politically correct as asking guys why they don't like fucking BBW's !

Perhaps, if you had included a response, indicating zero aversion to spinners.... I believe you would arrive at a more "complete" sampling of opinion.

Giz Originally Posted by MrGiz

I don't have any aversion to spinners yet as I haven't seen enough of them to know either way if that body type is for me. I find the BBW comment you said funny and I see your point there clearly. I actually saw more than a handful of BBWs and came to a consensus on my own as to what they were more comfortable with. But I can honestly say in all situations with BBWs, they never had an issue with full vaginal penetration or size. Its just a fact. And they tend to like it done harder. Not a requirement but sometimes making whoppie and fucking are totally different.

Also I intentionally left out the aversion of guys who preferred spinner providers, obviously so I could find out some reason as to why guys were hesitant to see them based on my own experience and other hobbyist experiences based on their preferences. If I included people who preferred spinner there would be an overwhelming majority of guys who preferred them......but it wouldn't answer my original question and concerns before booking either.

There have been times when back channel I would ask a guy if chick might be what they would consider the overnight type. Like they have a reasonable amount of stamina and depth and rigidness of sex was not an issue. Some hobbyist will hit me back and say stuff like:

"She is nice in session, but she really couldn't last long physically and she preferred limited sex due to her size."

I heard this so many times that I just wanted to get guys and gals opinion on it.

This is not a spinner hater thread, just trying to understand more.

gimme, I checked Sassy's review. apparently she doesn't qualify as spinner considering she gained additional 15#, from 115# to 130-135#.

Oh snap didnt catch that......Thanks. Shes still small though. If those pics are not accurate she definitely needs to change that I'm sure. That girls is 5"5 and hella small in that picture from the review. I could almost interlace my hands around her waist if my hands were a tad bigger lol. Based on the picture in that review, she would be a definite spinner to me. If shes gained weight since then I'd still see her....but that chick in her old pic would be considered a spinner to me just for example purposes.

I hate to point out the obvious here, but how much you can take in your vagina has NOTHING to do with your body weight lol. I know 90lb Asian girls who can take a coke can up the butt, and nevermind the front. I also knew a stripper from Miami who weighed in at around 100 and you would be amazed at what that girl did with a beer bottle lol. Do you not watch porn? Most of them are under 120 and packing those big boys in lol.


What you state is a fact, is bogus and only limited to your experiences. For instance, there is NO WAY I can do ACG with anyone above say 5...it is very uncomfortable, and I am not talking about the muscles in my legs lol.

I have gotten many references from girls a lot smaller than me, and what they called "average" I called pretty darn big.

The vagina size is what you are born with, and only something as serious as child birth or being split open will alter it to the point of being noticeable. In many cultures labia stretching is common practice but that's not the actual entrance...it's just the lips. Constant pulling, stretching, gnawing, etc. will in fact stretch that area out so that part is not a myth.

I am certainly far from a spinner, yet you can't find one review of me that does not remark or even complain about how small I am in certain places, and that fact that I cannot offer full length service for larger men. I will not even try to see a gent bigger than 6' and even at that he can't fit all of it in. I have turned down many guys who went to girls with lower body weight, and never complained about them not being able to handle it. I can give many examples lol. I am not one to stretch myself out with a toy before any type of intercourse to fit a larger guy, because that's a little contradictory imo. Why would he not want a tight fit when he arrives lol.

I think perhaps the low body weight of spinners may make it appear that you can see your uh (you know) in her stomach or something, but that has nothing to do with how muich she can take. She may not be able to perform certain positions, but it would seem to me that someone small would be even more able to be tossed around.

I just think this poll is a little out there, because the options for the most part have nothing to do with body weight. Why not just put a poll that asks, "Would you see a girl with a small vagina" lol.

I agree with London!
I have seen 3 different spinners in action....

One was 5',100lbs and a submissive...she took a 9 inch in the front & my 7 and half inch strap on in the rear at the same time with NO problems

One was 5'2,100lbs and was my gangbang buddy from phoenix...she helped me take on 15 guys at once{most were young/hung/& bbc}....I even saw her take two men well over 9 inches & thick at the same time in her twat

One I know from Austin was 5'2,90lbs.....I saw her take her hubbys 9 inch cock deep deep inside & beg for more!He banged her into the bed and almost broke it!!

And one other was 5'2.110lbs and I watched her hubby & my hubby DP her....then she got banged by my SO for over an hour and half and still kept on going!{lol--my SO makes ME wave the white flag}

Now as far as stamina..that all depends on the physical conditioning & the energy level at the time......


There are also alot of "factors" that determine "how deep" a woman go take.
{have you ever seen a diagram of the female reproduction system???}

each woman is different...

just keep researching to find "your perfect fit" & have fun!!!

I love all women so I have no preference.I've seen mostly every type.I agree with some of the post above.A woman's body size does not determine her vagina size or depth.I've seen "spinners" take it all and some can't.I've bottom out in average ladies and bbw.Jacquie said it best its going to take some time.It takes a little time for women to adjust.getting her aroused is a must.Some women vagina's relax after an orgasm and others may constrict.

BRAVO---very well put Prince---you are truely a man who understands women!

Oh snap didnt catch that......Thanks. Shes still small though. If those pics are not accurate she definitely needs to change that I'm sure. That girls is 5"5 and hella small in that picture from the review. I could almost interlace my hands around her waist if my hands were a tad bigger lol. Based on the picture in that review, she would be a definite spinner to me. If shes gained weight since then I'd still see her....but that chick in her old pic would be considered a spinner to me just for example purposes. Originally Posted by gimme_that

well, she wouldn't be classed as a spinner, but she definetely would be classed as petite.ymmv!