I call bullshit! No way is the average engagement 8.6 hours. if that is the average then there would have to be several multiple day dates in there and I seriously doubt that... Originally Posted by g0lfnuttThe math is right 1394 hours / 161 engagements.
The math is right 1394 hours / 161 engagements.
Noting that 66 of her engagements were in DC. I see it as totally possible.
3 out of 4 engagements are with repeat friends.
She is paid both for companionship and for the ability to retain discression. That comes at a price. I can believe 10k for a night with a political figure could be a price demanded and paid. Originally Posted by JustaguyLR
I call bullshit! No way is the average engagement 8.6 hours. if that is the average then there would have to be several multiple day dates in there and I seriously doubt that... Originally Posted by g0lfnuttSomething a lot do not understand is when you start dating chicks in this price point they have roughly 80-90% of their business from established clients. Most prefer multiple hours if not overnight visits so stacking client appointments of 4 or 5 daily is not a factor. After all there are only 365 days in the year. 161 appointments in 365 days equates to a whopping 2.267 a day with a good amount of off time for travel ect. Which is average for a woman in this price point segment of the hobby. So two clients with an average of 4 hours each only eats up 8 hours in a 24 hour day. And that pay out that day is 8k. If 161 clients had 4 hour sessions then the earnings would be 1.288 million. So actually being involved in this price point segment of the hobby I can see her numbers being close to realistic.