Trump approval rating

Even MAGA is finally waking up to this asshole's sheer incompetence amid his constant lying. Only 68% approval among Republicans. Down from 81% in March.

AP-NORC poll finds approval of how trump manages the government is eroding among Republicans | PBS News https://share.google/QC4G9LhozOJwybmsK

Donald Trump’s numbers are a boob joke.

donald trump’s numbers are a boob joke.

Originally Posted by txdot-guy

His approval rating with Boomers is crashing

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trum...omers-11047534

https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...proval-rating/

Bill O'Reilly does a very good job summarizing why Trump's approval numbers keep sagging

Even MAGA is finally waking up to this asshole's sheer incompetence amid his constant lying. Only 68% approval among Republicans. Down from 81% in March.

AP-NORC poll finds approval of how trump manages the government is eroding among Republicans | PBS News https://share.google/QC4G9LhozOJwybmsK

Originally Posted by jayzee43

Imagine though, that 68% of RedHat wearing morons are STILL supporting a felon. Overall Marist polls show his overall at 38-39% approval. Clearly the cult still loves the orange menace and only Americans who have a moral and ethical compassion see through his bullshit. Calling reporters Piggy and other derogatory baloney says enough. If you laughed at his name calling instead of being appalled tells more about you and how you'd laugh at a dictator running the country instead of standing up and saying...woah...that ain't right.

Imagine though, that 68% of RedHat wearing morons are STILL supporting a felon. Overall Marist polls show his overall at 38-39% approval. Clearly the cult still loves the orange menace and only Americans who have a moral and ethical compassion see through his bullshit. Calling reporters Piggy and other derogatory baloney says enough. If you laughed at his name calling instead of being appalled tells more about you and how you'd laugh at a dictator running the country instead of standing up and saying...woah...that ain't right. Originally Posted by eyecu2

i did laugh and everything you think you know about Trump and MAGA is what the biased media wants you to believe. but keep believing that if it makes you feel better. and keep calling me a "RedHat wearing moron" i find it amusing in a cult like fashion


bahahahahaa

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fox...n-good-economy

Latest Fox poll shows significant concerns about the economy which has dragged Trump's approval to a new low

60% don't feel the Presidenr or congress care about people like them. The "peace deals" that matter to Trump don't seem to matter to voters.

76% view the economy negatively and most feel this is Trump's economy and that his policies are responsible rather than Biden.

Ouch

The "peace deals" that matter to trump don't seem to matter to voters. Originally Posted by HDGristle

That's because the "peace deals" are figments of his deteriorating imagination. Completely made-up out of whole cloth. They don't exist.

i did laugh and everything you think you know about Trump and MAGA is what the biased media wants you to believe. but keep believing that if it makes you feel better. and keep calling me a "RedHat wearing moron" i find it amusing in a cult like fashion


bahahahahaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Glad you're amused. Your self-confession and conformity has been noted valued poster. You may now rejoin your RedHat membership and believing up is down and left is right.

Glad you're amused. Your self-confession and conformity has been noted valued poster. You may now rejoin your RedHat membership and believing up is down and left is right. Originally Posted by eyecu2

is that before or after you realize the media has been lying to you?

in a recent TWK Foundation poll TWK has 100% approval of Lord Donald's agenda.

in other news ....


Opinion - The results are in: Pollsters are still underestimating Trump

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/...170000619.html


W. Joseph Campbell, opinion contributor
Tue, November 4, 2025 at 11:00 AM CST


In a long-awaited report about last year’s pre-election polls, the country’s largest survey research organization proclaimed “a substantial recovery in overall polling accuracy” from 2020 and declared that “most 2024 public polling was notably accurate.”


President Trump won in last year’s presidential election by 1.5 percentage points over Democrat Kamala Harris, the tightest popular vote margin since 2000. With a few striking exceptions, pre-election polls last year mostly signaled a close race between the two party front-runners. “Coming on the heels of larger-than-typical errors in 2016 and 2020, and in the face of considerable skepticism of surveys’ accuracy, 2024 was a good year for public polling,” the report asserted.


But a closer look at the report, released Wednesday by the American Association for Public Opinion Research, finds somewhat less cause for applause — as well as grounds for some head-scratching uncertainty.


For the third successive presidential election, the polls of 2024 collectively underestimated popular support for Trump, an outcome that the report characterized as indicative of “lingering challenges” for pollsters in identifying and interviewing Trump’s followers. This tilt has persisted even though many pollsters adjusted their survey methodologies and techniques following their misses in presidential elections of 2016 and 2020.


Data presented in the report also showed that pollsters overall have underestimated support for Republican candidates in four of the past six presidential elections — the three in which Trump led the ticket and in 2004, when President George W. Bush won reelection.



The report mentioned, in passing, that 60 percent of 81 national polls conducted during the closing two weeks of last year’s campaign indicated that Harris was leading Trump. The report did not discuss that finding in detail. It is a notable point, however, given that Harris campaign officials said after the election that none of their private, internal polls showed her ahead.


Prepared by a 16-member committee of pollsters, academics and journalists, the report drew upon pre-election polls that had been released publicly, noting: “Many internal or proprietary polls—especially those commissioned by campaigns—never appeared in public.” Ironically for a study that tapped “public polling,” the report avoided referring by name to individual pollsters and how they fared in 2024.


For example, the report includes only one, oblique reference to the campaign’s single most stunning polling error — that of the usually accurate Iowa poll. Three days before the election, the poll reported Harris had opened a 3-point lead in the Hawkeye State, which Trump had carried twice before. The results suggested that, assuming the Iowa poll was accurate, then Harris’s chances of winning the presidency were enhanced.


The Iowa poll was off by 16 points — Trump won Iowa by 13 points.


The report’s preference for anonymity meant that some discussions of polling performance were worded vaguely. Without providing specific details, it said polling organizations “with the longest track records did not notch the best performance. Instead, the lowest errors came from firms that were newer, but were not tracking their first cycle.” This may have been a reference to AtlasIntel, a Brazilian pollster. AtlasIntel estimated that Trump would narrowly win the national popular vote and carry all seven swing states where the election turned. No other pollster scored as well.


The name “AtlasIntel” does not appear in the report, and the chair of the task force that prepared the report — Josh Pasek of the University of Michigan — said the committee preferred to focus on overall polling performance rather than the work of discrete firms and their surveys.


As such, the less-than-stellar performances of prominent, media-sponsored polls such as those of CNN and The New York Times were not addressed in the report. The task force included representatives from both media outlets.


CNN’s final polls said Harris led in four of the seven swing states, that Trump was ahead in two, and that the candidates were tied in one swing state. Had CNN’s swing-state polls accurately anticipated the election outcome, Harris would have won a majority in the electoral college and, in turn, the presidency.


CNN’s polls, which are conducted by a Pennsylvania firm, estimated that Harris led by 6 percentage points in Wisconsin and by 5 points in Michigan — results that were in error by almost 7 and 6.5 points in those respective swing states.


The final pre-election polls conducted by The New York Times-Siena College partnership estimated that Harris led in four swing states, that Trump was ahead in one, and that the candidates were tied in two others. The Times/Siena polling in the swing states, said Tom Bevan, a co-founder of the popular RealClearPolitics news and polling data website, was “atrocious.”


W. Joseph Campbell is a professor emeritus of communication at American University in Washington, D.C. He is the author of seven books including, most recently, “Lost in a Gallup: Polling Failure in U.S. Presidential Elections.”

Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Hell has frozen over. Trump admits his poll numbers have slipped

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...n/87368811007/

Hell has frozen over. trump admits his poll numbers have slipped

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...n/87368811007/ Originally Posted by HDGristle

What a relief. Now his voters can finally admit it, too

is that before or after you realize the media has been lying to you?

in a recent TWK Foundation poll TWK has 100% approval of Lord Donald's agenda.

in other news ....


Opinion - The results are in: Pollsters are still underestimating Trump

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/...170000619.html


W. Joseph Campbell, opinion contributor
Tue, November 4, 2025 at 11:00 AM CST


In a long-awaited report about last year’s pre-election polls, the country’s largest survey research organization proclaimed “a substantial recovery in overall polling accuracy” from 2020 and declared that “most 2024 public polling was notably accurate.”


President Trump won in last year’s presidential election by 1.5 percentage points over Democrat Kamala Harris, the tightest popular vote margin

SOME polls said Harris led in four of the seven swing states, that Trump was ahead in two, and that the candidates were tied in one swing state. Had CNN’s swing-state polls accurately anticipated the election outcome, Harris would have won a majority in the electoral college and, in turn, the presidency.


CNN’s polls, which are conducted by a Pennsylvania firm, estimated that Harris led by 6 percentage points in Wisconsin and by 5 points in Michigan — results that were in error by almost 7 and 6.5 points in those respective swing states.



Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Blah, blah blah.....do you think any of the the 20/20 hindsight is actually based on the POLLS or was it perhaps from things like-

Elon Musk offering over 300 million dollars and guest appearances including 1 million dollar giveaways (which are currently facing questions relating to being illegal.) And that those were in the swing states in question, where they ginned up the constituents for months.

Or

That the FOX (redhat network), OANN and NEWSMAX folks were blathering on 24/7 about Trump and all the lies that he spewed to get ppl to vote. - Literally telling them that there was shit that was gonna be fixed day 1- ( everyone wanted shit fixed) but yet here we are almost 320 plus days later and still nada. AND LETS not forget that MUSK bought Twitter in an attempt to completely change any thing related to FACTS vs. Fiction for the benefit of TRUMP, and holding no accountability to posters who can claim pretty much damn near anything they want- it's no longer even considered a valid news source since there isn't any fact requirements for posting. It's like Rumble or Truth or any of the 4chan bullshit posting sites. They should all be referred to as the dis-information networks.

Or

that the propaganda machine that was behind TRUMP- aka Heritage foundation and CPAC, American First PAC and all the other dark money and fuckery that was being imagined to not only influence the outcomes, but to destroy democracy to implant shitty stuff like Christian Nationalism was in place.

Yes- all those things- might be a 20/20 hindsight perspective, & some were (likely) illegal- and some will never be revealed as this administration has nothing to gain by doing that.

BUT

Americans know see that Trumpy is sagging in the ratings as much as his balls do after a heavy day on 18 on his cRappy Golf Motel resort in florida. Ratings and Polls are only a snapshot in time and yes- I do think that TRUMPY EtALL both cheated in ways that we'll come to find out about, and the beauty of that will surface during the 2026 midterms.

what will your spin machine say about that- when it will be a repeat of Nov 2025. Those ratings showed much closer ratings than the actual outcomes. MAybe it was because those in power, didn't have to worry about going to jail as much given they are able to claim immunity to everything from a complicit SCOTUS.

those ratings sure didn't pan out ----sorta like the 2024 ones, but one thing is certain- unless there is a MAJOR change and outcome for Dirty Donnnie- and the funky bunch-....a Lame duck is on the forefront for 2026 through the remainder of his presidency

I wouldn't go that far, Jay