Obama Furloughs FDA Inspectors; Keeps $100K First Family Dog Walker

Yssup Rider's Avatar
You missed the point, Whiny!
Doove's Avatar
  • Doove
  • 03-16-2013, 02:03 PM
Obama's "dog walker" just happens to be the head groundskeeper of the WH and he's had the job since 1972.

Boy you guys are dumb.

Hey, there is an oversupply of outrage with Obama as President. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Yup, and most of it is over stuff as stupid as the fact that the WH has a groundskeeper.

Can't wait to see how many posts we have to put up with this year over the "fact" that Obama has never been to Normandy on D-Day.

Olivia?
Regardless if a Republican or Democrat is in office, doesn't the mere fact that while average Americans are watching every penny and the economy is not doing so good (subject to debate) that the head of our country does not do anything to curb excess spending for frivolous shit like dog walkers?

Instead, you guys want to go back and forth blaming current and past presidents and making BS comparisons. Let's focus on the NOW and how to fix the NOW.
Doove's Avatar
  • Doove
  • 03-16-2013, 04:12 PM
Instead, you guys want to go back and forth blaming current and past presidents and making BS comparisons. Let's focus on the NOW and how to fix the NOW. Originally Posted by satexasguy
Got news for ya, we ain't gonna fix anything by going on and on about frivolous shit like the WH keeping a groundskeeper on the payroll.

And acting like he's nothing more than a dog walker, where's that gonna get us?

By the way, i read your question about 3 or 4 times, and there is no question there.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Regardless if a Republican or Democrat is in office, doesn't the mere fact that while average Americans are watching every penny and the economy is not doing so good (subject to debate) that the head of our country does not do anything to curb excess spending for frivolous shit like dog walkers?
Originally Posted by satexasguy
Or groundskeepers? You think POTUS should be out there mowing his own lawn?

and yeah, Doove... There's not question, but there IS a question mark!
Got news for ya, we ain't gonna fix anything by going on and on about frivolous shit like the WH keeping a groundskeeper on the payroll.

And acting like he's nothing more than a dog walker, where's that gonna get us?

By the way, i read your question about 3 or 4 times, and there is no question there. Originally Posted by Doove
He is more than a dog walker, he eats them too.
Doove and AssUPURHead ... you both have your heads so far up Osama's ass that you don't get the question. Let me try it again. Do you think that in such difficult financial times, the POTUS should at least try to lead by example by curbing spending at the White House? Of course since he is your demi-God I doubt you will find fault with anything he does. Nor with his precious wife who loves to spend, spend, spend, and spend tax payer dollars. And don't give the same BS excuse that previous administrations did the same. The economy sucks and Osama and Moochelle should stop sucking at the teet of the taxpayer.

Then again, Osama has never LEAD, he prefers to blame others for his lack of "Moving Forward".
Yssup Rider's Avatar
How awesomely brilliant that was!

I am certain the President will come mow your lawn if you asked.

Your question is as asinine as asking whether he should personally lead White House Tours.

Sorry, dipshit.

Thanks for playing.
pyramider's Avatar
Anyone notice that the cutbacks do not affect Congress or the Executive Branch?
Doove's Avatar
  • Doove
  • 03-16-2013, 09:51 PM
Doove and AssUPURHead ... you both have your heads so far up Osama's ass that you don't get the question. Let me try it again. Do you think that in such difficult financial times, the POTUS should at least try to lead by example by curbing spending at the White House? Originally Posted by satexasguy
Again, your original attempt at a question was not a question, but at least you got it right the second time around. And my answer is yes, he probably should to some degree. But then, how do you know he hasn't?

Nevertheless, let's get this thread back on its original track. Since i answered your question, you answer mine. Do you think the groundskeeper's position should be eliminated?
Obama's "dog walker" just happens to be the head groundskeeper of the WH and he's had the job since 1972.

Boy you guys are dumb.



Yup, and most of it is over stuff as stupid as the fact that the WH has a groundskeeper.

Can't wait to see how many posts we have to put up with this year over the "fact" that Obama has never been to Normandy on D-Day.

Olivia? Originally Posted by Doove
I said I don't begruge them a dog walker and that I wouldn't pay more than $35 or so a day. My dogs only have to be walked and played with once a day when I travel as they have access to my big back yard so I only pay $18, but I can see that people may need the walker to come twice a day for more.

I also said that the Obamas aren't much for Hope and Change when it comes to them not living off the tit of the American people. And I dogged the Bushs' grandson for riding coattails and sounding like Florida's villiage idiot.
and yeah, Doove... There's not question, but there IS a question mark! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
If the statement is a interrogatory, but is a command phrased as a question, a period, not a question mark is used. I'm assuming the rules of grammar are the same for sarcasam.
TheDaliLama's Avatar
Why is there a dog walker anyway?

Doesn't that place have a fence?
Again, your original attempt at a question was not a question, but at least you got it right the second time around. And my answer is yes, he probably should to some degree. But then, how do you know he hasn't?

Nevertheless, let's get this thread back on its original track. Since i answered your question, you answer mine. Do you think the groundskeeper's position should be eliminated? Originally Posted by Doove
No, I do not think the groundskeeper position should be eliminated. I think it should be reviewed and cutbacks taken accordingly if there is a way to reduce the cost. Which should be done with all of the WH spending.

Answer this, should Moochelle continue to take her elaborate family vacations without her husband at the expense of the taxpayers?
Doove's Avatar
  • Doove
  • 03-17-2013, 02:06 PM
I said I don't begruge them a dog walker and that I wouldn't pay more than $35 or so a day. Originally Posted by OliviaHoward
Why is there a dog walker anyway? Originally Posted by TheDaliLama
The best part of all this nonsense is that this so-called "dog walker" doesn't even exist (except in the minds of those afflicted with Obama Derangement Syndrome).

Answer this, should Moochelle continue to take her elaborate family vacations without her husband at the expense of the taxpayers? Originally Posted by satexasguy
Damn right she should, if that's what she wants to do. Every first family in history has done it, and every first family going forward will continue to do it. It's not her fault that the security detail for her and her children costs so much. And she shouldn't be forced to give up her right to travel just because she's the first lady.