Libraries get a temporary reprieve

Who thinks there should be less money for local libraries?

https://apnews.com/article/institute...b1dc2e4a473ff6

Who thinks there should be less money for local libraries?

https://apnews.com/article/institute...b1dc2e4a473ff6 Originally Posted by HDGristle

Someone who's trying to destroy the country from within at the behest of his foreign dictator overlord.

Someone who's trying to destroy the country from within at the behest of his foreign dictator overlord. Originally Posted by tommy156

Someone who doesn’t want the public to think on their own.

Someone who doesn’t want the public to think on their own. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

That too. Unfortunately, that part's nothing new, though. George Carlin has a great bit about that on "Life Is Worth Losing" from 2006.

What is new is having a U.S. "president" who is a wholly compromised Russian asset taking direct orders from the Kremlin.

Who the fuck still uses a library when you can find everything online?

It's not helping inner city yutes, based on graduation percentages.

Us rural folks aren't privileged to get them, so, this is purely a city/suburb issue.

You want libraries, YOU PAY FOR THEM.

The guys here pissing and moaning about Libraries clearly have never stepped foot in one!!!