Lawmaker on Michelle Obama: She Lectures Us on Eating Right While She Has a “Large Posterior” Herself

Kind of amazing we have 50+ threads of idiots like Marshall (excuse me, "Choom", how could I confuse the two?) wetting his pants about whether the size of a woman's ass makes their husband a valid presidential candidate. Choomshall, would you please point out that qualification in the constitution? I can't seem to find it.

But worse still is the insight it gives to Choomshall's "brain" (a scary thought if there ever was one): he is fixated on the unimportant things to the point he cannot see his own stupidity even when pointed out to him.
--He is against healthy eating; but just let "Lean Mean Fighting Machine" Limbaugh support healthy eating and Choomshall will flip faster than you can follow.
--He rationalizes that any liberal must be a liar because he doesn't think they are attractive (care to show us a good face shot of you, moron? Or are you afraid that by your own standards you would then have NO credibility? Sorry to inform you, you already don't.
--He tries to build the argument that he and the RWWs are "friends of minorities", all the while vigorously arguing against anything that would actually level a 400 year old biased set of rules. (And no, that doesn't man I support many of the rediculous LWW proposals).

Rambo, we disagree on a lot of things, but you're spot-on in this case. Originally Posted by Old-T

Rush doesn't go around preaching to anyone to exercise or go on a diet. We conservatives like to make fun of Moochelle's enormous ass because it illustrates what a "HIPPOcrite" she is.

You know your off your rocker on a hooker message board when you start quoting... yourself Originally Posted by budman33

I know you feel defeated by me when these kind of posts start to appear......

I know you feel defeated by me when these kind of posts start to appear...... Originally Posted by ChoomCzar

NO ONE feels defeated by you Marshall. The pathetic attention seeking by a banned member is a loss in and of itself.

you quoted me instead of yourself so well done. baby steps. HA HA HA .. cough.. HA

Obama's wife could be an enormous fat pig and it wouldn't change the fact that we are the most obese nation in the world. Good nutrition starts when your young. God forbid kids eat fruits and vegetables.. and pizza on whole wheat crust.

Currently 99 million obese people call the United States home.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/...0-by-2030.html

liberal hypocricy: they like the government to use force and tell you what to eat, but not when the government uses force and tells you you can't have sex with hookers......

You do know where your posting this right? Go to where people can revel in your intellect or lack therof

You do know where your posting this right? Go to where people can revel in your intellect or lack therof Originally Posted by budman33

It's not my fault you can't understand a simple argument.....under one situation you like government force and under another you don't.....I don't like force under either situation.....


ME = not hypocrite

you = hypocrite


that I have to spell it out for you should be embarrassing to you, but you're probably too stupid to feel embarrassed.......

It's not my fault you can't understand a simple argument.....under one situation you like government force and under another you don't.....I don't like force under either situation. Originally Posted by ChoomCzar

Ah, such a small minded view yet again. Choomshall you have (again) shown your hypocracy by your very example: According to your post you don't like force under ANY situation, and you say someone who accepts force in one situation but not another is a hypocrit.

So lets examine your supposed purity of thought:

--You don't want anyone to force certain foods on you.

But then you must be against force in these situation too:

No one should force anyone to pay taxes of any sort.

No one should forcibly keep anyone out of the country who wanted to get in.

No one should force me to only give YOU a key to your safe deposit box.

No one should force me to actually put antibiotics in those pills my pharmacy dispences to you.

You are a blithering conceted blowhard if you call Budman a hypocrit without admitting openly (and loudly) that you are at least as big a hyportic. (Or of course you can admit you are for anarchy (no taxes = no government = anarchy), open boardes, bank robbery, and safe drugs.

I do expect you will reply to this, I don't expect it to be sane, rational, or honest. But maybe--just maybe--you will surprise me and admit you are a hypocrit who cares nothing for the truth. And if you do, that will be proof that you are not Marshall.

Your post is total BS and you know it--we all actually know it. We DO want the government to force SOME things--the real debate is WHAT things.

Choomshall has been quite active today but does not feel the need to defend himself.

Therefore all I can do is assume Choomshall concedes publicly that he is a hypocrit, and nothing he says can be assumed true. Not that it surprises anyone who has had to read his vomit.

And I suppose I will have to keep pushing this to the forefront to keep reminding him. I take no pride of authorship in pointing this out and anyone who cares to use this insight, feel free.

Old-farT[/B];1051687255]Ah, such a small minded view yet again. ChoomCzar you have (again) shown your hypocracy [H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-S-Y is the correct spelling] by your very example: According to your post you don't like force under ANY situation, NO NO NO NO Old-farT, you didn't read what I said very closely.....typical liberal who doesn't read.....I said I didn't like force in EITHER OF THOSE SITUATIONSand you say someone who accepts force in one situation but not another is a hypocrit.

So lets examine your supposed purity of thought: OK!

--You don't want anyone to force certain foods on you. correct

But then you must be against force in these situation too:

No one should force anyone to pay taxes of any sort. I only want to pay my fair share of taxes for Constitutionally enumerated Federal power items, not liberal bullshit......

No one should forcibly keep anyone out of the country who wanted to get in.illegal aliens should be forcibly restrained from entering the US......we have legal means, some which I don't agree with, for entry into the US.......I guess that makes me evil in your eyes like those EVIL CORPORATIONS! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

No one should force me to only give YOU a key to your safe deposit box. ???????

No one should force me to actually put antibiotics in those pills my pharmacy dispences to you.???????????

You are a blithering conceted blowhard if you call Budman a hypocrit without admitting openly (and loudly) that you are at least as big a hyportic. of course I'm not.....my views are intellectually pure and consistent....your views are bat-shit crazy and hateful(Or of course you can admit you are for anarchy (no taxes = no government = anarchy), open boardes, bank robbery, and safe drugs.

I do expect you will reply to this, I do expect it to be sane, rational, or honest.yes But maybe--just maybe--you will surprise me and admit I am a hypocrit who cares nothing for the truth. OK, you are a hypocrite who cares nothing for the truthAnd if you do, that will be proof that you are not Marshall.I am ChoomCzar, not Marshall.....

My posts are total BS and you know it--we all actually know it.OK We DO want the government to force SOME things--the real debate is WHAT things. Originally Posted by [B

WOW! The nurse aid must have put your Depends on too tightly when you made this post......unfortunately, you totally destroyed your own post when you misquoted me by saying I was opposed to all government force. When you go back and look at my post, I said I didn't agree with force in those 2 situations.......I am a conservative, not a libertarian....I agree with some Federal government, only as little as is reasonably necessary to carry out the enumerated powers in the Constitution....Of course, I also recognize that States should have powers not reserved for the Federal government.....Hey, I agree with the Founding Fathers' vision, so sue me.......

ChoomCzar has been quite active today but does not feel the need to bitch-slap me for being the little whore I am.

Therefore all I can do is assume ChoomCzar concedes publicly that I am a hypocrite, and nothing I say can be assumed true. Not that it surprises anyone who has had to read my vomit.

And I suppose I will have to keep pushing this to the forefront to keep reminding him. I take no pride of authorship in pointing this out and anyone who cares to use this insight, feel free. Originally Posted by Old-T

Good Lord! Some people actually have to work. I was literally in the middle of a reply when my appointment showed up early. You weren't worth making them wait......

Good Lord! Some people actually have to work. I was literally in the middle of a reply when my appointment showed up early. You weren't worth making them wait...... Originally Posted by ChoomCzar

More proof that Coomshall is Marshall, everyone knows it, but getting banned doesn't seem to really mean anything if you are a vocal buffoon.

Yes, Marshall, you still know how to lie by intentionally "quoting" someone and changing the words. How clever of you! Now, who was it who used to do that? Help me remember, you lieing, deceitful, hypocritical subhuman.

WOW! The nurse aid must have put your Depends on too tightly when you made this post......unfortunately, you totally destroyed your own post when you misquoted me by saying I was opposed to all government force. When you go back and look at my post, I said I didn't agree with force in those 2 situations.......I am a conservative, not a libertarian....I agree with some Federal government, only as little as is reasonably necessary to carry out the enumerated powers in the Constitution....Of course, I also recognize that States should have powers not reserved for the Federal government.....Hey, I agree with the Founding Fathers vision, so sue me....... Originally Posted by ChoomCzar

Sorry, you are now trying to rewrite history. Had you said this (the quote above) I would not have had any issue. But that's not what you said.

Here is what you DID say: "It's not my fault you can't understand a simple argument.....under one situation you like government force and under another you don't.....I don't like force under either situation.....


ME = not hypocrite

you = hypocrite"

You said that agreeing with government force in one case and not agreeing with it in another is hypocracy. Right there in your own words (unlike you, if I put it in quotes I try not to change it to suit my purposes).

Getting a bit forgetful about your own words?

Sorry, you are now trying to rewrite history. Had you said this (the quote above) I would not have had any issue. But that's not what you said.

Here is what you DID say: "It's not my fault you can't understand a simple argument.....under one situation you like government force and under another you don't.....I don't like force under either situation.....


ME = not hypocrite

you = hypocrite"

You said that agreeing with government force in one case and not agreeing with it in another is hypocracy. Right there in your own words (unlike you, if I put it in quotes I try not to change it to suit my purposes).

Getting a bit forgetful about your own words? Originally Posted by Old-T

Right there in big red letters...doesn't say "I don't like force under any situation," does it?...you destroyed and embarrassed yourself, that's why you made the post before this one......nice try, better luck next time Old-farT........


And just for the historical record:

HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA! HA!

You blasted Budman because because he was split on wheter force was acceptable. You blasted him for being inconsistent. Because he was inconsistent you said HE was a hypocrit.

I am just applying YOUR OWN DEFINITION TO YOU. You are also inconsistent, thus by YOUR logic you have self-named yourself Hypocrit.

It's just that simple. Even though you now want to write revisionist history. Sorry--self acknowledged hypocrit you are.

Now if you want to show some humility and admit that you were rash in attacking Budman, and if he is willing to forgive your attacks, then I might be willing to reconsider and change "Choomshall is a hypocrit" to "Choomshall is rash, anger prone, and often posts stuff that isn't true."