The presidential debate - debate

He stated he was following the example set by your Great Obominable One -- who is also charged with protecting state secrets -- and that he wanted to set the record straight without the distortions presented in the MSM. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

He could have done that without trying to make a buck. His credibility is suspect when he chose to go that route. IMHO

He could have done that without trying to make a buck. His credibility is suspect when he chose to go that route. IMHO Originally Posted by WTF

“I am donating most of the proceeds from this book to charity. Here are several I recommend.

All In All The Time Foundation
(Allinallthetimefoundation.org )

The Navy SEAL Foundation
(Thenavysealfoundation.org)

Tip of the Spear Foundation
(Tipofthespearfoundation.org)

“All three charities help support the families of fallen SEALs”
(299, Owens).

Owen, Mark. No Easy Day: The Firsthand Account of the Mission That Killed Osama Bin Laden : The Autobiography of a Navy SEAL. Dutton: New York, 2012. Pp. xvi, 316.

Johnson is on the ballot in enough states its possible he can piss in the "party punch bowl" and sour up the election ... to what extent, and to which party is yet to be determined. Originally Posted by CJ7

I don't think Johnson is a better option, but I strongly believe he should be in the debate. It would be more entertaining, and he is a good enough speaker he might prod the other two to actually say something of substance.

“I am donating most of the proceeds from this book to charity. Here are several I recommend.

. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Bradley Edward Manning was countering what he believed to be wrongs. Why go after him and not the author? Bad PR is the only reason. They are very similiar.

That does not negate the fact that he wrote a book for profit. My original point. .

He could have countered with interviews or a free online account. All his excuses are just white noise to me.

Bradley Edward Manning was countering what he believed to be wrongs. Why go after him and not the author? Bad PR is the only reason. They are very similiar.

That does not negate the fact that he wrote a book for profit. My original point. .

He could have countered with interviews or a free online account. All his excuses are just white noise to me. Originally Posted by WTF

Manning released secrets -- information that was not in the public domain. Owens might be successfully prosecuted for violating the terms of his contract, but he didn't release any secrets -- Odumbo, et al, had already done that.

Dead ass.

Yes, Ryan was a horrible choice, but he was pandering to the conservative base, which will be his downfall.

I can't wait to see this debate tonight! Originally Posted by markroxny

I don't expect it to be totally lopsided. Obama won't push hard. All he has to do in hold serve. Just don't fuck up and he wins.

Unlikely. Remember he said that "they aren't going to vote for me no matter what". He dismissed them. He basically said fuck em. So far all he has said in defense is that well he didn't really mean it the way he said it.

Fact is it hurt him ...bad. But he can't get away from it. And the fact is that 47% of the American people DO NOT see themselves as victims that the government owes food and housing. Only thing he can do is say that it came out wrong, here is what I meant to say. But he can't linger on it, it will only hurt him more

BTW, his runnign mate sees it as the 30 % not 47%

SMH

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/10...0-percent.html Originally Posted by markroxny

Great idea for a drinking game. Take a shot every time Obama says 47% and see if you're still conscious at the end of the debate. My money is on unconscious.

Manning released secrets -- information that was not in the public domain. Owens might be successfully prosecuted for violating the terms of his contract, but he didn't release any secrets -- Odumbo, et al, had already done that. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

None of that negates my original contention that Owens has no credibility with me because his book was for profit. That he chose to donate most (and he has already shown to have a blatant disregard for written contracts , I have reason to pause that he would honor this verbal one. In fact I would like to see his actual donation contract if one is written. It sounds more like a PR stunt than any legal obligation).

Neither Manning nor Owens have been tried, btw. Obama's trial start tonight and the verdict will come November!

This thread has been derailed by DOTY and his obsession with our penises.

Lets discuss the original intent of the thread here instead:

http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=567082

This thread has been derailed by DOTY and his obsession with our penises. Originally Posted by markroxny

You fancy yourself way too much if you for one moment believe anyone but your pathetic-ass gives a flying-fuck about your dick, marks-rocks-with-pee.

Tell us all how Obama got rich, cause he is ya know. Originally Posted by acp5762

Obama got rich off of the book Bill Ayers wrote for him.

Great idea for a drinking game. Take a shot every time Obama says 47% and see if you're still conscious at the end of the debate. My money is on unconscious. Originally Posted by TexTushHog

I don't think he said it once. Obama is so arrogant, I don't think he realized he was going to have to make an effort.

Axlerod's response to Obama's performance was "This is not a game changer." He didn't even attempt to spin it. Obama's camp is in damage control mode.

Without his teleprompter, Obama is nothing.

Joe, I don't think the election is a done deal either way, but you better watch the returns from the local ER, because if Obama does win you are almost certain to have a major stroke. You have whipped yourself into a truly delusional state of excessive optimisim and I worry for your health if your bubble gets burst.

Joe, I don't think the election is a done deal either way, but you better watch the returns from the local ER, because if Obama does win you are almost certain to have a major stroke. You have whipped yourself into a truly delusional state of excessive optimisim and I worry for your health if your bubble gets burst. Originally Posted by Old-T

Don't worry about me; I'm just enjoying the moment. The Germans have a word for it: schadenfreude. It's just good to see Obama finally exposed as the complete failure he is. If Romney performs anywhere near this strong in the next two debates, he will win.

Obama got rich off of the book Bill Ayers wrote for him. Originally Posted by joe bloe

Are you talking about "Dreams From My Father"