Connecticut Elementary School.

itheir NOT my kids, or YOURS or OBAMAS,,
their really not
their the PARENTS kids

they really dont need Obama , or YOU or anyone to decide whats best for their kid Originally Posted by JONBALLS

Following this insightful "logic", if kids were killed because a school building collapsed, it is their parents' problem, and nobody else should offer any suggestion on how to prevent it from happening in the future.

children are better off home schooled these days anyways , no liberal indoctrination for me thanks



I wouldnt send my kid anywhere near a public school , especially roc city schools, they should be demolished



with the kids out of the building first of coarse

This is not a parenting issue. People, young and old, are being gunned down in all venues - movie theaters, shopping malls, work places, and on and on.

then theres not enough people carrying to stop them

need less restrictive laws

incidents of gun violence is down

then theres not enough people carrying to stop them

need less restrictive laws Originally Posted by JONBALLS

This is at least better than this:

their NOT my kids, or YOURS or OBAMAS,,
their really not
their the PARENTS kids

they really dont need Obama , or YOU or anyone to decide whats best for their kid Originally Posted by JONBALLS

hey we agree on 50% thats better than any day I can remember since I came here so your making progress

welcome to the real world

I know EXACTLY what I did. I doubt you do. Originally Posted by GP

Oh, i know what you tried to do. What you ultimately did, though, is quite another thing entirely.

Can you acknowledged that guns, in the hands of qualified and trained individuals subject to background checks, prevent crime and improve public safety? Originally Posted by GP

I love how, less than a week ago, you were critical of how i worded a simple comment (irrespective of whether or not it was accurate), and then you come here today and ask a totally one sided question.

If you're going to hold me to a simple yes/no answer, then you need to figure out a more balanced way of asking the question. Do so and i'll answer it. And keep in mind, i'll have a few questions of my own.

Originally Posted by GP
Can you acknowledged that guns, in the hands of qualified and trained individuals subject to background checks, prevent crime and improve public safety?

yes

And keep in mind, i'll have a few questions of my own. Originally Posted by Doove

As do I

Your whole attitude just blows. Comments you make like the one about "whacking off" while staring at a gun rack....are only designed to offend. Fortunately, there are many here who seem to realize that. Originally Posted by rooster

And not for nothing, but i wonder where the Bushmaster marketing people would come down on that issue...

And not for nothing Originally Posted by Doove

sweet looking deer and chuck gun doove. mmmm A bit light for bear. can it be had in .30 rather than .223??????

Oh, i know what you tried to do. What you ultimately did, though, is quite another thing entirely. Originally Posted by Doove

That's because you are just SOOOOOOO smart. Trust me, you have no clue what I do. Don't ever think you could get in my head.

I love how, less than a week ago, you were critical of how i worded a simple comment (irrespective of whether or not it was accurate), and then you come here today and ask a totally one sided question.

If you're going to hold me to a simple yes/no answer, then you need to figure out a more balanced way of asking the question. Do so and i'll answer it. And keep in mind, i'll have a few questions of my own. Originally Posted by Doove

Was it a loaded question? Yep, sure as hell was, but not to the extent you make it out to be. What, you don't like it when the table are turned on you? Awwwww, poor baby! I knew it was too simple of a question for you to answer. Go ahead and ask all the questions you want. The more you post on this topic, the more you prove you complete and total ignorance on the subject.

The more you post on this topic, the more you prove you complete and total ignorance on the subject. Originally Posted by GP

You're the one who totally obliterated 3 days worth of your own arguments in 2 easy sentences. Not me.

uh huh, sure I did.