OBAMA TO USE THE BODIES OF CHILDREN (dead and living) TO GRAB GUN RIGHTS !!!!!!

what is your response DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR?

Are 10,000+ gun deaths a year enough for you to admit we have a gun violence problem in America?

If so what do you propose? More dead babies?

If not, then what are we supposed to think of you?

I know what I think. You are a complete and total disgrace to our society. And DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR!

Holy shit, I hope there a kids there. After all, guys like DIPSHIT OF THR YEAR wants more of them to die in school!

what is your response DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR?

Are 10,000+ gun deaths a year enough for you to admit we have a gun violence problem in America?

If so what do you propose? More dead babies?

If not, then what are we supposed to think of you?

I know what I think. You are a complete and total disgrace to our society. And DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

How many of those gun deaths were caused by legal gun owners carrying legal guns? That's the problem, you grab the guns from law abiding citizens, and the criminals will keep their guns.

I guess your rampant "stupidity on parade," Assup, is why you were elected . . .

DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR 2013

ASSUP!!!

Are 10,000+ gun deaths enough to discuss the issue? Or not?

Call me names all you want. It's a legitimate question, and one none of you "gun enthusiasts" have yet to answer.

Why don't you answer my question, Assup? How many of those gun deaths were caused by law abiding gun owners, using their legally acquired weapons, in something other than self defense? Simple question, isn't it? Maybe you could take some time away from scouring through my posts to find "lies" and look that up instead.

Naw, hosebag, we ain't playing that game. You're trying to weasel out of the issue.

Anybody who commits murder or manslaughter is, by definition, NOT law abiding, so your bullshit is irrelevant.

But for the sake of discussion, if enough people are able to get their hands on guns illegally to cause that many gun deaths, then don't you think it's a problem?

Are you interested in solving this problem or just want to jerk off on dead babies in the name of Ted Nugent and the NRA?

Can't defend it. 500 deaths still puts us at crisis level. But 10,000? You're a sick fuck!

Can't answer the question, can you, Assup. It's a simple one, but that would require your brain to work, which we all know doesn't. Too bad. I feel sorry for people who are ignorant and proud of it. I guess that's why you are the . . .

DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR 2013

ASSUP!!!

another evasion by the Liar of the Year.

I addressed your stupid fucking question. But you haven't addressed mine, which was posed first.

You're a condescending, illiterate douchebag.

I am pretty sure there's a twelve step program, even in the fucking wasteland.

sign up ASAP.

"I'm Whiny, and I'm a compulsive LIAR!"

"hello, Whiny!"

I was trying to address your issue, Assup. Of course 10,000+ gun deaths is important. However, I would like more data to make sure the issue is legal gun owners. If they are not the problem, I don't see how limiting their access to guns will lower the death rate.

Now answer mine, please, Mr.

DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR 2013

ASSUP!!!

Naw, hosebag, we ain't playing that game. You're trying to weasel out of the issue.

Anybody who commits murder or manslaughter is, by definition, NOT law abiding, so your bullshit is irrelevant.

But for the sake of discussion, if enough people are able to get their hands on guns illegally to cause that many gun deaths, then don't you think it's a problem?

Are you interested in solving this problem or just want to jerk off on dead babies in the name of Ted Nugent and the NRA?

Can't defend it. 500 deaths still puts us at crisis level. But 10,000? You're a sick fuck! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Yssup - your posts are entertaining to say the least. Entertaining in a way grading a 9th grader's POV on gun deaths would be: A lot of words, hardened POV based on no actual/personal experience and moreover, having neither depth or validity to his/her statements.

It's also amusing to read your aggressive rants. While I appreciate your ability to make me laugh - really, I do - your routine of spinning in circles and not really saying much of anything is quickly becoming boring. For example - tonight, I skipped over most of your posts (I already anticipated your response(s) - and yes, anticipated correctly).

I do have a challenge for you - if you're up to it and its not above your intellectual ability. I'd enjoy reading your response. My challenge to you is to answer the following question: If you're so concerned about the 'great' number of deaths caused by guns, I can only assume that your crusade to help innocent people avert premature death extends well beyond supporting stricter gun laws. Take for example the following realms: Alcohol, sports, the automobile industry, the healthcare industry, The Government/Military, and the tobacco industry are the type of areas I would assume you're actively participating in an attempt(s) to reduce the number of people killed each year by these very preventable causes of death. Can you share with me/us - based on your vast experience in doing the right thing and moreover, saving lives - your work in combating these evil forces that take so many precocious lives from our world? Please see the links below if you need clarification of what I'm asking you to 'conceptualize' above.

While you don't owe me - or anyone else - a demonstration of your maturity, dedication to saving lives and/or your non-good-for-nothing, non-small-minded, and non-just-plain-stupid self, it would be nice to finally see you post something with more than hollow words.

Gent


http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datab...crime-us-state
http://seggleston.com/1/wp-content/custom/ds_index.php

A century ago it was called waving the bloody flag. Lynching, murders, beatings were normal and some politicians actually would go get a bloody shirt that they could wave over their head as they spoke to the crowd.

Condescending bullshit gets you nothing, Gent. I graduated a LONG time ago. You want a policy paper or issue brief on society's ills, you'll do what everybody else does ...PAY FOR IT.

This issue is about reducing gun violence in America. Not me.

But if you're up to the challenge and care to spend your time doing so, I'll be happy to read and critique it.

That is, if its within my somewhat limited intellectual ability.

Shithead.

Yes, it is about gun violence, but you refuse to look at facts. You just rant, like Gentleman10 says you do. You never bring any facts or reason to the table. You're actually an immature, moronic idiot incapable of intelligent thought. Which is why you are our . . .

DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR 2013

ASSUP!!!

see whirlie? the WH included dead kids to further their point....... Originally Posted by CJ7

Glad to see you admitting that Obama is using dead kids as PR props.....

see whirlie? the WH included dead kids to further their point.... Originally Posted by CJ7

Glad to see you admitting that Obama is using dead kids as PR props.....