you got Obie confused with T BooneBoone has lots of windmills, probably more than anybody
Originally Posted by CJ7
thank you Boone
could be because neither the White house or Obama had anything to do with it.According to reports Algerian troops attacked and some hostages were killed.did not say by which side.They were taken in protest of France ,not the US. Originally Posted by i'va biggenThe U.S. -- Odumbo and the White House -- has been involved from the start of the French bombing campaign in Algeria.
I wouldn't have thought it possible, but you get more stupid as the days roll by.Then why is it so difficult for this Administration to acknowledge that terrorism exists,
I was thinking that we had killed OBL, were droning the shit out of terrorists in Afghanistan and Pakistan and were still running combat patrols in Afghanistan looking for the bad guys. In addition to the work being done by the folks in the CIA, the NSA and countless other US government organizations that let you feed your fat ass and sleep soundly at night without interruption. But, I guess that's just all made-up bullshit and we are going to "ignore terrorism."
What fucking world do you live in? I wonder what the soldiers and Marines in Afghanistan risking their lives every day would think about comments like yours...ignoring terrorism? We are fucking all over terrorism. Originally Posted by timpage
Boone has lots of windmills, probably more than anybodyNeed to catch up on the "current events" ....
thank you Boone Originally Posted by cptjohnstone
The U.S. -- Odumbo and the White House -- has been involved from the start of the French bombing campaign in Algeria.
Mali: U.S. Prepares to Back Military Intervention
INTER PRESS SERVICE, 14 JANUARY 2013
U.S. Secretary of Defence Leon Panetta has applauded France's surprise airstrikes on Islamist rebels in northern Mali that began late last week and continued over the weekend. . . .
While Panetta refused to offer details of new U.S. assistance, he did state that there would be "some limited logistical support" and "intelligence support", as well as "some areas of airlift". . . .
http://allafrica.com/view/group/main.../00022297.html
http://allafrica.com/stories/201301150071.html
http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/17/world/...est/index.html Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Wrong as usual asswipe you are dismissed.they only offered drones for info the Algerians declined ,and it was their baby.the French are not in Algeria.. Originally Posted by i'va biggenIt's the French mission in Mali that the U.S. has been backing since the beginning. However, the U.S. IS presently sending "unarmed" drones over Algeria.
Biggen you had better go do some research on France and Algeria. Look up the 1960s and the Battle of Algiers.
Now the terrorists are demanding a trade for the blind shiek. This keeps coming up and seems to ad credence to the claim that Obama is trying to create a scenario where he can send the Sheik home and he gets to claim a diplomatic victory. If you don't know what I'm talking about (and I'm sure that some of you don't have a clue) one theory that has been advanced a couple of times is that Benghazi was an October surprise. Our ambassador gets kidnapped, they demand the blind sheik, and Obama claims victory after making the swap. Since the sheik is old and blind he is not operational. At least the White House would say that and coverup the symbolism. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
It's the French mission in Mali that the U.S. has been backing since the beginning. However, the U.S. IS presently sending "unarmed" drones over Algeria.
“On Thursday, the United States became more deeply involved in the war, working with the French to determine how to best deploy American C-5 cargo planes to ferry French troops and equipment into Mali, according to an American military official. . .
“Senior American military officials said that aides traveling in London with Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta were struggling to get basic information about the raid, and that an unarmed American Predator drone was monitoring the gas-field site. . . .”
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/18/world/africa/algeria-militants-hostages.html?_r=0 Originally Posted by I B Hankering
they are in Mali. Originally Posted by i'va biggenThey are also in France, Afghanistan, ..... or from wherever we give them a ride.
They are also in France, Afghanistan, ..... or from wherever we give them a ride.
http://www.phantomreport.com/us-depl...t-north-africa
The U.S. presence has been associated with the French presence.
http://revolutionaryfrontlines.wordp...ute-in-africa/
The French have simply been there longer and with more experience. Originally Posted by LexusLover