What's Bad About a House-to-House Search?

Wow.

You people are brainwashed. This thread is like reading an Orwell novel.
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Whatever you say, Jane Fonda.

Whatever you say, Jane Fonda. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Could a new nickname, along the lines of Hanoi COG, be far behind?

As much as I have difficulty responding to COG, because attention is what he craves, I feel I must.

The distinguishing fact is simply these were terrorists. Their numbers were unknown. Their armaments were unknown. Their targets were unknown.

It was certain that the terrorists intended to do more damage on as large a scale as possible.

That is the distinction.

You want to call it martial law, destruction of freedom, etc, etc. The VAST majority of us do not. Most of the U.S. believes this was reasonable, necessary, and well done.

It figuratively kills you. Try to suffer quietly.

Old Dingus

Looks like two in a row.

The photos I am going to link are bloody and VERY upsetting. Seriously, some may not be able to handle them.

My purpose is to show the actual scale of horror, which had to be worse if you were present and in suffering, dying color.

The linked site is a little difficult to navigate and there are a couple of Federal Court documents in there; however, you can easily find the photos.

In my experience the photos do not look as bad as they might because the victims were undoubtedly deep in shock and (fortunately) not perceiving the pain at that moment.

I do not believe any freedoms were abridged or even temporarily disturbed. If such freedoms had been abridged or temporarily disturbed, these photos would have me inclinde to agree it was necessary under the circumstances for the public good.

http://cryptome.org/2013-info/04/boston-bombs/boston-bombs.htm

Old Dingus

Looks like two in a row.

The photos I am going to link are bloody and VERY upsetting. Seriously, some may not be able to handle them.

My purpose is to show the actual scale of horror, which had to be worse if you were present and in suffering, dying color.

The linked site is a little difficult to navigate and there are a couple of Federal Court documents in there; however, you can easily find the photos.

In my experience the photos do not look as bad as they might because the victims were undoubtedly deep in shock and (fortunately) not perceiving the pain at that moment.

I do not believe any freedoms were abridged or even temporarily disturbed. If such freedoms had been abridged or temporarily disturbed, these photos would have me inclinde to agree it was necessary under the circumstances for the public good.

http://cryptome.org/2013-info/04/boston-bombs/boston-bombs.htm

Old Dingus Originally Posted by Old Dingus

you have to take the source into consideration... COF ,like all the other idiots sit in the middle just waiting for an opportunity to piss their diaper ... if the city hadn't ask residents to stay inside, the shitheads would have carped endlessly about how the government wasnt doing their jobs protecting its citizens yada yada yada ... you know the rest of the story

Could a new nickname, along the lines of Hanoi COG, be far behind? Originally Posted by bigtex

"Cairo Cog" has a better ring to it.

Although in this situation: "Grozny Cog" fits.

"Cairo Cog" has a better ring to it.

Although in this situation: "Grozny Cog" fits. Originally Posted by LexusLover

start a poll !!

This whole thing has way to many inconsistencies. Tamerlan was reported as being dead from having a shoot out with Police, then was ran over by his brother. Now here's a video of a subject described asTamerlan alive and well, naked getting into a Police car. The only thing that seems to be consistent is that three people died from the blast. Then over 150 injured, then it's 260 injured then 170. They need to get their shit straight before they air it. Then they wonder why people call " False Flag" or conspiracies and shit.
http://enfordummies.com/wordpress/mo...lown-off-fake/

Whatever you say, Jane Fonda. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Hanoi Jane good name for him...

I'm amazed at how strongly you will defend terrorists. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Is that what you call it? Then you completely misunderstand. I am not, and would never defend a terrorist.

What I am defending is the Constitution, the Rule of Law and Due Process, while you promote a government sanctioned form of vigilanteism.

Mob rule, or due process. You've made your choice, I've made mine.

Is that what you call it? Then you completely misunderstand. I am not, and would never defend a terrorist.

What I am defending is the Constitution, the Rule of Law and Due Process, while you promote a government sanctioned form of vigilanteism.

Mob rule, or due process. You've made your choice, I've made mine.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Bunch of Dupes. Looking up for something that won't show up.

More cut and paste merriment from Cairo COG!

What a Whiny bitch follower.

Of course, you have every right to be mundane, plagiaristic and a liar. The fucking constitution says so...

Please tell the class exactly what lie I told, Assup. Thank you for participating.

Please tell the class exactly what lie I told, Assup. Thank you for participating. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

How about we start with StupidOldLyingFart making the following statement in an Eccie Sandbox post:

"I lied"

That should be a pretty good place to start! Don't ya' thinck?