SHE FINALY DID IT. LOLABREA's MEW SHOWCASE

Good work on the showcase Lola. The pics are very good because you are a lovely lady. Thanks for the fantastic three sessions I have had with you, and I look forward to the next. Keep the entrepreneurial spirit going.

Lol
White Knight
Anytime someone takes the side of a provider then they become a white knight.
No my friend that I'm not, but your precious BT has been running her mouth about Lola on this topic from page 1 and the minute BT is treated in the same manner she treats others here comes her white knight
Oh
The accusations must be false bc she told you I'll hold that in as much regard as BTs reasoning for Lola not working on her MBA

Lola you are yummy!

LOL! your first two sentences go nicely together. Originally Posted by Jarvis

Nope. Not even her client. Spoke to her to help her with the bogus post, that's all.

And, in case it hasn't occurred to you, pointing out that LolaBrea is threatening to out someone isn't being a White Knight.

It is something we should ALL be repelled by, even if we don't know the person being threatened.

Nope. Not even her client. Spoke to her to help her with the bogus post, that's all.

And, in case it hasn't occurred to you, pointing out that LolaBrea is threatening out someone isn't being a White Knight.

It is something we should ALL be repelled by, even if we don't know the person being threatened. Originally Posted by ExNYer

Spoke with who?

Anytime someone takes the side of a provider then they become a white knight.
No my friend that I'm not, but your precious BT has been running her mouth about Lola on this topic from page 1 and the minute BT is treated in the same manner she treats others here comes her white knight
Oh
The accusations must be false bc she told you I'll hold that in as much regard as BTs reasoning for Lola not working on her MBA Originally Posted by pwood

No, she isn't my precious BT. I'm not even a client.

And she WAS wrong for starting up this pissing match with Lola.

But there is NO justification for Lola threatening to out her. NONE. That is a banning offense.

And she didn't TELL me the accusations were false, I READ them and they were ludicrous. Some of them even contradicted each other.

Spoke with who? Originally Posted by Jarvis

BT. Who else would I be helping with the "bogus" post?

Maybe now it's me who can't read but didn't you say you knew they were bogus bc u have spoken with the lady in question

BT. Who else would I be helping with the "bogus" post? Originally Posted by ExNYer

So, BT is the lady in the link that Lola has?

You call me a white knight but u read the so called bogus accusations about her, u r not a client but u put ur cape on and called to help the damsel in distress

No sir that's a white knight

Maybe now it's me who can't read but didn't you say you knew they were bogus bc u have spoken with the lady in question Originally Posted by pwood

That's the way I read it too. He was speaking to the lady in the link and he's not her client, now he says he was speaking with BT. 1+1=1

Correct

this shit cracks me up. isn't this the way it always ends up??? lolabrea and bitchtits are no where to be found, and the bk/wk however you view it are duking it out...classic shit here.

Maybe now it's me who can't read but didn't you say you knew they were bogus bc u have spoken with the lady in question Originally Posted by pwood

Re-read the WHOLE post.

I wrote that I knew her and spoke to her AND that I read the link and the comments section. And that there were contradictions and ludicrous statements that make the posts bogus. However, some personal information was true.

I also never mentioned WHAT the lady told me that would provide definitive, objective proof that the story in the post was bogus and the guy was trying to kill her business..

So, BT is the lady in the link that Lola has? Originally Posted by Jarvis

??? Haven't you been reading this thread? Yes. BT is the lady that Lola is threatening to out.

That's the way I read it too. He was speaking to the lady in the link and he's not her client, now he says he was speaking with BT. 1+1=1 Originally Posted by Jarvis

Looks like you haven't read the whole thread EITHER. Lola made it clear that the link was about BT.

And I am NOT a client of BT/the lady in the link. i just know the story.

The two of you need to catch up. FAST.

Lola is threatening to out BT, got that?

Can I make it any clearer?

No Fletch I just take offense to my words or opinion being mistaken for a WK or some kind of fucking puppet .
I simply stated that nowhere did Lola threaten to out BT plain and simple