25% of Americans are idiots

Perhaps listening to ur own advice might serve u well

We can agree to disagree- thanks for admitting that there is some higher being or entity and call him/it/her what you like= but these things you see around you everyday didn't come from nowhere- and speaking of hooker boards- surely one day you must have thought the very least that a man has a penis- that goes inside a vagina- and if the man releases some fluid it can cause reproduction- do you think that was by design or by chance- they male and female somehow have the right parts or was it just some mere coincidence that somehow we evolved the right apparatus? Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

Lmao! When exactly did I admit that this was all done by a higher being? Now you're just putting words in my mouth. This is ridiculous.

LFS
Actually there are many flaws in Darwin's theory that scientists agree on
And a Noble prize is over a million not 250k Originally Posted by pwood

WHERE???????????????????? PLease, come with the peer-reviewed scientific journal where this is documented? Oh, that's right, people like you are so uneducated you do not even know how a scientific theory comes about...right?

Holes in Dawin's Theory? OHFGDG! PLease, submit your paper with these "holes" to the Nobel Institute, your prize of $250,000 is awaiting. Geezz, it's better to keep your mouth shut and LET people think you're stupid, rather than open it ...well, you know, heard it all of your life, haven't you? Originally Posted by Look-at-Stupid

There are other evolutionist who admit Darwin had things wrong- you can't be serious- his theory has been disproven by other scientist. let me gibe you a simple reason why evolution is wrong:

Every time you or I log into a computer and have to enter a password, I'm reminded of how impossible evolution is.
One little mistake on the keypad, and I can't log in. There's even a website where I seem to be in permanent "log-in purgatory." I can't login ever. Granted, it's operator error. But still...
How does this tie to evolution? Because if evolution were true, then we are to believe a whole series of complex sequences managed to get everything right---repeatedly.
To use a clichéd example: It would be like a monkey typing at random and coming out with the complete works of Shakespeare without any errors

There are other evolutionist who admit Darwin had things wrong- you can't be serious- his theory has been disproven by other scientist. let me gibe you a simple reason why evolution is wrong:

Every time you or I log into a computer and have to enter a password, I'm reminded of how impossible evolution is.
One little mistake on the keypad, and I can't log in. There's even a website where I seem to be in permanent "log-in purgatory." I can't login ever. Granted, it's operator error. But still...
How does this tie to evolution? Because if evolution were true, then we are to believe a whole series of complex sequences managed to get everything right---repeatedly.
To use a clichéd example: It would be like a monkey typing at random and coming out with the complete works of Shakespeare without any errors Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

Then produce the peer-reviewed scientific journal where this is documented?

Note to audience, this is where a complete moron cries like a little bitch "prove my lies are not true" or the variation "research my lies"

SO DAMN TOUGH ALWAYS BEING RIGHT I TELL YA!!!

There are other evolutionist who admit Darwin had things wrong- you can't be serious- his theory has been disproven by other scientist. let me gibe you a simple reason why evolution is wrong:

Every time you or I log into a computer and have to enter a password, I'm reminded of how impossible evolution is.
One little mistake on the keypad, and I can't log in. There's even a website where I seem to be in permanent "log-in purgatory." I can't login ever. Granted, it's operator error. But still...
How does this tie to evolution? Because if evolution were true, then we are to believe a whole series of complex sequences managed to get everything right---repeatedly.
To use a clichéd example: It would be like a monkey typing at random and coming out with the complete works of Shakespeare without any errors Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

Swallowed that creation bullshit whole didn't you boy? And YOU WON'T BE ANSWERING MY QUESTION

You are one brave man behind a computer calling me out of name!

WHERE???????????????????? PLease, come with the peer-reviewed scientific journal where this is documented? Oh, that's right, people like you are so uneducated you do not even know how a scientific theory comes about...right? Originally Posted by Look-at-Stupid

Here is a source I quoted:
Scientific Problems With The Theories Of Charles Darwin

The Theory of Evolution
Much of the following information has been adapted from the work of Dr David Rosevear, UK, web site: www.Creationsciencemovement.co m

Charles Darwin and his book, "The Origin of the Species"

- Charles Darwin wrote "The Origin of the Species" in 1859.

- What he observed was very small variation in the length and breadth of the beaks of finches. Finches are small birds found in the Galapagos
Islands, off the Western cost of South America.

- Darwin actually noted variation within a species, or variation of a kind.

- These variations in the bird's beaks were so minor that later visitors to the Islands had trouble identifying the variations.

- What Darwin actually observed was Micro-Evolution, or variation within one species of bird, which we all see all the time.

- Darwin need not have bothered to travel to the Galapagos Islands to observe Micro-Evolution, or variation within species.

- Everyone sees evidence of variation within a species all the time.

- Darwin did not observe Macro-Evolution, the changing of one species into another, for example a lizard turning into a bird.

- Macro-Evolution has never been observed by anybody.

- Darwin observed variation of a species within a kind, namely Micro-Evolution, which is commonly observed in every country in the world.

Macro-Evolution

- Macro-Evolution is defined as the mutation of one species to another species, and has never been observed.

- Since Evolution is supposed to happen very slowly, there should be plenty of examples of Evolution all around us, with new species being
formed all the time.

- However, no evolutionist has ever actually produced one living example of a species actually changing into another species.

- A number of fossil relics and skeletons have been produced, claiming to demonstrate Macro-Evolution.

- However, these fossil remains are hotly debated, some have been shown to be frauds, and Carbon Dating itself is not accepted by many Creationists.

- If Evolution was true, the total number of species in the world should be increasing every year.

- In fact, the number of species in the world is declining every year, according to the World Wildlife Organisation.

Micro-Evolution

Micro-Evolution is defined as the variation within one kind of species. There are large number of dogs found all over the world. Dog DNA has a gene pool for long legs, short legs, long hair, short hair, large bodies and small bodies etc. Since dogs share the same common gene pool, dogs may be interbred with other kinds of dogs, and the resultant dog is called a mongrel dog, with features common to both parents. The same may be found with cats, horses, rabbits, guinea pigs, and many other animals commonly seen.

However, it is not possible to interbreed a dog with a rabbit. These different species do not share the same gene pool. In rare cases distantly related species may be interbred, such as a horse with a donkey. However, the resultant offspring is invariably sterile, and unable to continue this new "species".

In Contrast with Macro-Evolution, Micro-Evolution is defined as the variation within one kind of species and is very commonly observed. Examples of Micro-Evolution include the variation between kinds of dogs, cats, birds, horses, and ducks.

Charles Darwin need not have bothered to travel to the Galapagos Islands, he could have easily noticed Micro-Evolution amongst domestic pets in his own home, or birds in his own garden.

Charles Darwin did not observe Macro-Evolution, but Micro-Evolution, which is commonly observed on an everyday basis.

Then produce the peer-reviewed scientific journal where this is documented?

Note to audience, this is where a complete moron cries like a little bitch "prove my lies are not true" or the variation "research my lies"

SO DAMN TOUGH ALWAYS BEING RIGHT I TELL YA!!! Originally Posted by Look-at-Stupid

Let's bet you wouldn't say that standing in front of me face to face.

You are one brave man behind a computer calling me out of name! Originally Posted by pwood

Waaaaaaaaaaaa!!! i can't back my lies so I am gonna bitch and cry!!! WAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!

Let's bet you wouldn't say that standing in front of me face to face. Originally Posted by wellendowed1911

Waaaaaaaaa! Yet another liar who cries when called on his lies!!1 WAAAAAAAAAAAa!! and care to bet on that buddy?

Geee? still waiting on a link to a peer-reviewed scientific journal that disproves evolution? bwhahahahahaha, so damn tough always being right

Lets test the survival of the fittest today

Lets test the survival of the fittest today Originally Posted by pwood

Waaa!! I can't back my lies so now I turn tough guy!!! WAAAAAAA!!!!!!!

Just like taking candy from a baby

Hmmm...I actually learned a few things here...whether they're true or not I don't know, but...the question I asked as a little kid has never been answered: If a higher being created the universe, who/what created the higher being? And who/what created THAT higher being? And who...

They asked me not to come back to Sunday School.