Just to play devils advocate here, as I personally would not be interested in writing reviews about gentlemen....+1
Yes normally it is buyer beware however normally the "product" as you so interestingly put it, is not a living breathing human being that is placed in a vulnerable position.
There are several elements that would be both positive and negative in regards to an opposing review system.
Pros for the gentlemen.
Cons for Gentlemen
- Most of the gentlemen desire (or at least state as much) the woman to enjoy their company past their generosity. As we are all different and unique an opposing review system would likely help this desire along. "One mans trash is another mans treasure" comes to mind. Some women enjoy very dominant men for instance and they would be eager to accept a date with a gentleman that was inclined in that direction and perhaps even encourage it. Where another would politely decline to avoid the complications and disappointment on his end if a confrontation should arise due to the nature of interest.
- It would help expedite screening. Instead of individually emailing 3 ladies to request this information it is already pressed and ready for viewing. The gentlemen's wait is shortened by 10 fold.
- The lady can gage the more intimate interests and provide a far better experience without the gentleman having to actually break it into details for her. Some gentlemen are actually quite shy after all.
- A gentleman can see where he went wrong if the date failed miserably. Some are not even aware they offered the incorrect donation and many women feel skittish about broaching the subject after.
- Providers are given such high donations to balance more of the actual risk factors onto the provider herself rather than onto the client. Consider the rates size as "hazard pay" Reviews risk tampering with this balance
- It can become far less of an relaxing hobby or tryst when one is concerned about the after math of the review, though this goes both ways the gentleman is the one allocating finances.
- Privacy is of utmost importance to many of the gentlemen. Again another reason why they offer such high donations to their partners. Though this con seems to be quite similar to the first it is a completely separate issue. A agitated or expressly displeased provider can out far more dangerous information to destroy a gentleman's privacy than (normally) a gentleman can do to a provider.
- It is not hard for a jilted lover, provider, friend, or even enemy to write a false review. Again this con goes both ways of course. As such a gentleman could have a stigma placed upon him in graphic detail that he does not deserve.
There are of course pro's and cons to the provider as well. It is all prospective. Would I read reviews of gentlemen callers? Most likely yes. Would I base my interest in accepting a date with them upon the review? Possibly but unlikely. It would depend on the information in said review and how the gentleman approached me in regards to requesting a date. It would simply be another possible source of information.
Would I write reviews? No. There have been a handful of gentlemen I have had the privilege of meeting that were respectful, sweet, kind or sublime when it came to the more intimate discussions of the big bang theory, however I would much rather the lady email/text/call me to receive this information. I would rather provide this information to another well known provider rather than the whole world.
In regards to P411. The okays simply state she saw you, you were not affiliated with a direct danger. Be it physical, legal, or financial. HOWEVER, a lady has easier access to your "references" and may contact them in regards to the date(s) that you have had. P411 is my personal favorite way to screen a gentleman(or lady) caller. Originally Posted by JayceeRivers
@JayceeRivers
All very well thought out and great points added.
