"Socialism is not Communism"

Actually yes. The show gave me greater insight to better understand the Pilgrimage of Grace, and I thought the show's portrayal of Anne having Protestant views that influenced Henry was innovative.



Learning about Sir Thomas More was a step integrally 'associated' with earning a MA, you Hitler worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM. Subsequently, the MA translated into earning more, you Hitler worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

Your illiteracy is showing, you Hitler worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM, that is not what was typed.

You're the one who needs to upgrade your Funk and Wagnalls to improve your literacy, you Hitler worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM, that is not at all what was typed.

And here's an FYI for your stupid ass, you Hitler worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM: worship·ping also worship·ing

Furthermore, you Hitler worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM, "worshiping" is the spelling preferred by ECCIE's spell check.

[/COLOR] Thus you're admitting that you haven't read a single damn thing you have ever posted, you Hitler worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Are you schooling me, IBIdiot? You think I didn't check yer spellin when you first started up with that shit? Dag nabbit. Suckered me right in, IBIdiot!

I shoud have known better than to fuck with a dude with an associated Master's Degree?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!

You read More, to earn More and flirt with a ... Provider. How about showing us how much MORE you earn with your associated Master's Degree by posting a review or two. Man or woman, your choice.

Glad you learned something from me. Originally Posted by Zanzibar789

You're pretty full of yourself you POS. I posted that years ago and learned it in the 1960s. What were you doing then? Sucking your neighbor off?

I never hear anyone asking for more tyranny.

Oops! I stand corrected. Gwyneth Paltrow wants more tyranny. I suppose that she thinks she will always be on top meanwhile her husband has moved on to Jennifer Lawrence. http://www.inquisitr.com/1530999/gwy...all-the-power/

*Pic removed - JCM



Choose....

You're pretty full of yourself you POS. I posted that years ago and learned it in the 1960s. What were you doing then? Sucking your neighbor off? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Actually I didn't exist back then and you should really stop wearing your heart on your sleeve. It's bad form especially for someone that tries to be as antagonistic as you.

In theory, in a pure communal setting, there would be no individual property, no leadership structure, no money in any form. All property, goods, materials, and supplies are shared equally among the entire group, and all decisions are made by collective consent. There are numerous reasons why such a society could not function in the real world, the number one being that coercion is anathema to the communal structure. Thus, as soon as there is a 49% that objects to what the 51% wants to do, the communal structure breaks down.

This is why I said we haven't seen an example of pure communism since we lived in caves.
Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh

That is why I mentioned the Indian tribe in Mexico (outside of Tepic).

Their world is "real" .... and also spiritual.

I never hear anyone asking for more tyranny.

Oops! I stand corrected. Gwyneth Paltrow wants more tyranny. I suppose that she thinks she will always be on top meanwhile her husband has moved on to Jennifer Lawrence. http://www.inquisitr.com/1530999/gwy...all-the-power/

*Pic removed - JCM



Choose.... Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Wasn't that the same thing the German People said to Adolph Hitler in the early 1930's? Make him a supreme leader so he could get his agenda through.

It is useful idiots like Paltrow that allow Dictators and Despots to solidify their hold over an entire Country.

Actually I didn't exist back then and you should really stop wearing your heart on your sleeve. It's bad form especially for someone that tries to be as antagonistic as you. Originally Posted by Zanzibar789

Really? I don't think you exist now FuckZup.

I never hear anyone asking for more tyranny.

Oops! I stand corrected. Gwyneth Paltrow wants more tyranny. I suppose that she thinks she will always be on top meanwhile her husband has moved on to Jennifer Lawrence. http://www.inquisitr.com/1530999/gwy...all-the-power/



Choose.... Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Well THAT's fucking relevant!

You'll never get near either of them, JDIdiot.

BTW -- that photo that is on the left of YOUR post, JDIdiot, is of an underage teenybopper, if anyone's counting. I have removed it from your quote in MY post.

Chomsky explains in simple words why "socialism" gets a bad name. Please share:

http://youtu.be/K4Tq4VE8eHQ

Sounds like it could work, for the people, that is!

Chomsky explains in simple words why "socialism" gets a bad name. Please share:

http://youtu.be/K4Tq4VE8eHQ

Sounds like it could work, for the people, that is! Originally Posted by HoustonMilfDebbie

If Socialism has worked successfully anywhere it was in countries with small populations with very little ethnic diversity. America is a large country with a vast array of ethnicities, religious beliefs and political affiliations. I don't see socialism working in a country like America.

Jim

Really? I don't think you exist now FuckZup. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Really, then why are you responding to Zanzibar by addressing me, JDIdiot?

Swilling again?

Chomsky explains in simple words why "socialism" gets a bad name. Please share:

http://youtu.be/K4Tq4VE8eHQ

Sounds like it could work, for the people, that is! Originally Posted by HoustonMilfDebbie

You know Deb, I once had a teacher that told us that if you can successfully teach someone something then you have mastered it. If you can't even talk about it except in posts we can only assume that you have no real concept about what you're talking about.

I'm going to start calling what Deb does the Obama stratagem. Put out what other people say but don't post what you think. That way if it blows up, you can disavow your involvement. If it works then you can claim to be a leader. Kind of like a literary empty suit. If Deb does not commit her words to paper then she can claim to stand for anything.

Another brilliant post from the absolute authority on all things education.

Do you even read the shit you post?

If Socialism has worked successfully anywhere it was in countries with small populations with very little ethnic diversity. America is a large country with a vast array of ethnicities, religious beliefs and political affiliations. I don't see socialism working in a country like America.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

I believe America is run by a few very elite who own most of the major multi-national corporations. It is more or less a shadow government whose main objective is power and money. They have no interest in the majority whatsoever.

I believe America is run by a few very elite who own most of the major multi-national corporations. It is more or less a shadow government whose main objective is power and money. They have no interest in the majority whatsoever. Originally Posted by HoustonMilfDebbie

Exactly.