Thinck you know the guidelines?

did somebody say something?

did somebody say something? Originally Posted by John Taffer

Good one

.... but not to deaf ears!!!!

I think it's quite ironic what you have posted in your signature line as of right now:


"I don't embrace excuses, I only embrace solutions"


HAaAAAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAH!:roflm ao:

Hope you can at least still hear your self talking.
Ol' Hellen-Keller-lookn'-ass.

Let's not take this somewhere it was not headed..... we are not talking life threatening....

Just the premise that having information you should not should get you banned. Originally Posted by Whispers

A permutation of your question does involve life threatening situations as a reason to pass it directly to the Provider. That is why I put it out there.

And F2C last sentence is true.

The WK definitely can report things to the MODs, Admins or owner of the board without ever involving the provider.... He certainly does not get his pat on the head for being a good by from her if he does though.... Originally Posted by Whispers

There in lies the truth of the situation. The WK seeking the pat on the head is the root cause for most leaks in regard to ROS.

If a WK has a genuine concern about something posted in a ROS, he should RTM that concern himself. That is what the RTM is for. There is no caveat to the GLs that allows a WK to share ROS with a hooktard. So, she can RTM the ROS.

By acknowledging that she has ROS, she immediately becomes the party of an investigation of leaked ROS. Why she thincks it is ok that she has ROS is irrelevant. She could escape the trap the WK has placed her in by asking him to RTM the ROS.....he gets his pat on the head and all is well on a SHMB.

Did you start this thread with a specific situation in mind? Or is this a general conversation on the pitfalls of the guideline?

If this is in regards to my questions regarding the Banning of Eryn I did search her posts and I can see no place where she may have revealed knowledge of any information to anyone that should not have it. None of her posts appear edited. Perhaps something was posted and removed in it's entirety....

I have not read any of the normal controversy surrounding her as someone that was making a fuss over something she should not have known.

It is obvious that she has been banned for some reason and staff will not comment on that..

Applying your general suggestion to her banning....

HYPOTHETICALLY.....

If some information was posted in ROS about her that would identify her and some guy went running to her to tell her it was he needs to be banned. No question about that at all. There are Mods, Admins and Owners he could go to first.

If she started a thread about it and disclosed the information she needs to be banned.

But if all she did was contact a MOD about it or even the member that posted the review about it, then it comes down to whether or not she gives up the guy that gave her the information. If she gives up the guy a MOD should consider the situation before acting.

Is there a pattern to her regularly having information she should not? Is there information to indicate that she regularly asks for and receives the ROS or private e. I er than that!know bett m? IF so then some level of infraction might be deserved.
E scar
IF all Eryn is guilty of is knowing ... not REVEALING to people that could not know.....then banning her is not in line. Originally Posted by Whispers

My threAD has nothing to do with Eryn. She

My threAD has nothing to do with Eryn. She Originally Posted by Still Looking

Cool!

Another Claire conspiracy then?

do you own this board? is this your thread? if someone post something you dont approve of then just keep your mouth shut and dont look at it. Originally Posted by John Taffer

Careful now. It's in your best interest not to mess with The Godfather. It's like a dog humming your leg. It's better to just let him finish.

There in lies the truth of the situation. The WK seeking the pat on the head is the root cause for most leaks in regard to ROS.

If a WK has a genuine concern about something posted in a ROS, he should RTM that concern himself. That is what the RTM is for. There is no caveat to the GLs that allows a WK to share ROS with a hooktard. So, she can RTM the ROS.

By acknowledging that she has ROS, she immediately becomes the party of an investigation of leaked ROS. Why she thincks it is ok that she has ROS is irrelevant. She could escape the trap the WK has placed her in by asking him to RTM the ROS.....he gets his pat on the head and all is well on a SHMB. Originally Posted by dearhunter

Bingo!

Please take me to your land; so I too can learn to spin cotton-candy from my vagina. Originally Posted by Ebony Jasmine Love Austin

Ok that's funny! I'd pay to watch that!

There in lies the truth of the situation. The WK seeking the pat on the head is the root cause for most leaks in regard to ROS.

If a WK has a genuine concern about something posted in a ROS, he should RTM that concern himself. That is what the RTM is for. There is no caveat to the GLs that allows a WK to share ROS with a hooktard. So, she can RTM the ROS.

By acknowledging that she has ROS, she immediately becomes the party of an investigation of leaked ROS. Why she thincks it is ok that she has ROS is irrelevant. She could escape the trap the WK has placed her in by asking him to RTM the ROS.....he gets his pat on the head and all is well on a SHMB. Originally Posted by dearhunter

YA know... THAT is what this board is missing.... a Primer on being a White Knight!

UUUUUUUmm,

How does that help or solve anything exactly?

Please take me to your land; so I too can learn to spin cotton-candy from my vagina. Originally Posted by Ebony Jasmine Love Austin

And because EJLA is a good sport....let's take this to a new level. In one of my most recent reviews I note how much hair this young lady had around her kitty. I think my exact words "in the ROS" were... The last time Zi saw that much hair was when Ebony Jasmine Love Austin shaved her back!

Now did I just reveal ROS? But what did I do wrong? I mean after all one of the hobbyist stated in the open with no private quotes it looked like she needed a one ton lawn mower to cut her kitty hair. Seems he let the cat out of the bag or as SKF once said "once the horse shit is out of the horse you just can't get it back in."

Ok now watch where I'm going here... I may or may not get points for posting ROS info. But it was the other hobbyist who let the hiotse shit fly. Now obviously EJLA knows what Si said! And if she says one thing about it in this or any other threAD I'll hit the RTM button and note ROS being discussed and expect her banned! Or at least pointed.

What say you LJLA? Come on girl... Dance with the devil!

You are incorrect in that Ebony Hairy Back is free to comment on anything posted on the open board. She does not have an extended duty to verify that it is not ROS. Because, she cannot see ROS to make that determination.

Setting aside the origin of ROS, a modtard may edit her comment if in fact it is determined that it has no place on the open board. But, he will go to the source of the breach to swing his blade.

The same is not true for the hooktard reporting the ROS. She knows in advance that she is not supposed to have ROS.

Do it! Then she can say she got the info from you and you both get banned

Do it! Then she can say she got the info from you and you both get banned Originally Posted by rockerrick

LMAO!

Do it! Then she can say she got the info from you and you both get banned Originally Posted by rockerrick

Not necessarily