Why no blacks

Just for the hell of it, go to backpage escorts and put "no black" in the keyword search box. 11 hits just today, just now.
Same answer as always to anybody who complains about NBA:
You're absolutely correct, and you have absolutely no recourse. Move along, nothing to see here.

My sincerest apologies to you. I should have known better. I greatly overestimated your intelligence. Based upon your past posting history, most of it largely unintelligible, I should have never given you that much credit. Now, please feel free to return to playing with your goldfish.

If anyone would like to respond to my original question, I would appreciate some intelligent discourse. Originally Posted by stimulatethemind

Hey, guess what...Aarrgghh.
Yeah, your a real ginious. Aarrgh

Hey, guess what...Aarrgghh.
Yeah, your a real ginious. Aarrgh Originally Posted by thebuffmantraples

Well thought out and articulate post. Very sound and reasonable cognitive process. Your goldfish is getting lonely.

Just curious here....why is "colored" offensive, but "people of color" is acceptable? Originally Posted by stimulatethemind

Because "colored" is a past participle, a form of a verb that is used as an adjective or adverb to modify another word. In this case, it suggests that an action has been taken against them, that they have been "colored." It turn their identity into something that was done to them, rather than something that they are. They are of color. They have not been colored.

This is the same reason that it is now considered impolite to say "transgendered". A person is transgender. They have not been transgendered.

Just for the hell of it, go to backpage escorts and put "no black" in the keyword search box. 11 hits just today, just now.
Same answer as always to anybody who complains about NBA:
You're absolutely correct, and you have absolutely no recourse. Move along, nothing to see here. Originally Posted by zeejoe

oh man, what a rough day,
see, I read this post and I decided to do something similar:
I went to backpage,. typed in "blacks allowed"
and got mugged

wtf?

Because "colored" is a past participle, a form of a verb that is used as an adjective or adverb to modify another word. In this case, it suggests that an action has been taken against them, that they have been "colored." It turn their identity into something that was done to them, rather than something that they are. They are of color. They have not been colored.

This is the same reason that it is now considered impolite to say "transgendered". A person is transgender. They have not been transgendered. Originally Posted by KCQuestor

Thoughtful response, KCQ. Thank you.

Thoughtful response, KCQ. Thank you. Originally Posted by stimulatethemind

You on the other hand seem insecure with both! Yes, little boy you are smart..it's OK little man I get yah.

Hey, guess what...Aarrgghh.
Yeah, your a real ginious. Aarrgh Originally Posted by thebuffmantraples

I never claimed to be a genius, but at least I know how to spell it.

You seem to really want the last word here, so you take it. I'm done with you; but, thanks for playing.

The flip side of this question is the unjustified negative reviews I have seen by some guys who have the obvious intention of harming a ladies business. Just because the lady might not have met his demands for a perfect encounter is not a reason to attack her in a public discussion.
JR Originally Posted by JRLawrence

Connotative meanings are often used in propaganda to attack others.
JR Originally Posted by JRLawrence

Since you have repeatedly failed to enlighten us as to when and where this "public attack" took place or where these "negative reviews" are, should we regard this statement as well as many others by you to be "propaganda" as well?

I remember, and participated in, the civil rights marches of the 50's and 60's. I remember walking out of a cafe with a lot other boys because they wouldn't serve one of us.
JR Originally Posted by JRLawrence

Before I congratulate you JR, just a few simple questions.

You have claimed to be 70 years old. You said in another thread that you quit using shaving cream 50 years ago. I'm not great at math but since this is 2015 and you claim to be 70, that means by my calculations that you were born in 1945. Assuming this to be true, how old were you when you marched in the "50's"? In 1950 you would have been 5, in 1959 you would be marching at the ripe old age of 14. While we're at it, in what city and state did these "marches" you claim to have been in take place? What was the name of the "cafe" and where was it located?

Last question JR..

Was BRIAN WILLIAMS in these marches with you?

One could attempt to scientifically examine the interactions between a provider and client. Granted, measurement of sociological evidence is somewhat lacking in the hobby.


A provider (and their pimp) may argue that it is the innate behavior of African-American men which makes them poor clients. I insist rather, that European-American heritage and (lack of) culture is arguably more institutionalized which makes for a better fit - even to a flaw, as it becomes evident in hobby predation and is supported in models of population dynamics.

Because "colored" is a past participle, a form of a verb that is used as an adjective or adverb to modify another word. In this case, it suggests that an action has been taken against them, that they have been "colored." It turn their identity into something that was done to them, rather than something that they are. They are of color. They have not been colored. Originally Posted by KCQuestor

I totally agree with the connotation present with 'something that was done to them.' It is the white male who in future will play victim cards. Envision throngs of heritage-proud people loudly declaring "We are people of color!" Maybe you heard it first at a Puerto Rican pride parade.

Pay no matter to color. We can make a difference in the lives of those we interact with. Even if sometimes excluded, we'll find a special lady to spend time with. We're never all going to be loved 'equally' anyway, that's just semantics.

I encourage us all to celebrate national Black History Month ~ and love on ~

I will never understand the logic in asking why on situations you cannot change. What does it matter why a provider won't see AA's? The fact is that she won't. Get over it, move on and see a provider that will see you. No use in asking why because the truth doesn't even matter at that point. Even if you got a real honest answer to the question, the provider still would not see you. It just seems pointless to ask why and argue about the potential answer when it won't change anything.

I dont see younger black guys at all. I do see 40+ with screening. And i just simply post no AA on bp. But the reason being, most are "pimps". Most have no intention on paying. Most will say they have donation but when they arrive its part of the donation if any at all. Most are unemployed and are criminals, this is Kansas City after all. Every girl i have met or dealt with that had problems in this business is direct effect from what a person of color had done. I even met a girl that said 2 "pimps" acting as clients tried to kidnap her..... Of course harm or anything could happen from a person from any racial or ethnic background but nba weeds out alot of bs from the beginning. Just a little from my viewpoint.

I dont see younger black guys at all. I do see 40+ with screening. And i just simply post no AA on bp. But the reason being, most are "pimps". Most have no intention on paying. Most will say they have donation but when they arrive its part of the donation if any at all. Most are unemployed and are criminals, this is Kansas City after all. Every girl i have met or dealt with that had problems in this business is direct effect from what a person of color had done. I even met a girl that said 2 "pimps" acting as clients tried to kidnap her..... Of course harm or anything could happen from a person from any racial or ethnic background but nba weeds out alot of bs from the beginning. Just a little from my viewpoint. Originally Posted by Goddess_Kc

I wonder how many ladies here also have similar stories they haven't or just aren't willing to share? I would like to hear them!

If it makes some people squirm, oh well!

Before I congratulate you JR, just a few simple questions.

You have claimed to be 70 years old. You said in another thread that you quit using shaving cream 50 years ago. I'm not great at math but since this is 2015 and you claim to be 70, that means by my calculations that you were born in 1945. Assuming this to be true, how old were you when you marched in the "50's"? In 1950 you would have been 5, in 1959 you would be marching at the ripe old age of 14. While we're at it, in what city and state did these "marches" you claim to have been in take place? What was the name of the "cafe" and where was it located?

Last question JR..

Was BRIAN WILLIAMS in these marches with you? Originally Posted by malwoody

I was born in 1943, which means that when I started high school (1955) it was the first year that blacks (or colored -whatever term is currently acceptable) were allowed in the "white" schools, after the Supreme Court decision in Brown vs. the Topeka, KS Board of Education" (1954) . In 1958 (I was 15) the cafe was somewhere near Bagnell Dam on the Lake of the Ozarks. The friend's father that was refused service was a college professor (and I won't say where he taught - but the white guys all knew him well). From 1954 to 1966 is twelve years (my age was 12 to 23). Most of us saw a lot during those years, if we paid attention.

Look up your civil rights history about what happened in those years. In 1966 I entered the US Marine Corps as a private with two college degrees, which put me into a position different from most. I saw a lot more during my tour in the military, both good and bad.

We can't change everything in the world. We can only change ourselves, if and only if, we think about the changes needed in ourselves.

Brian Williams is much too young to have experienced anything from the 50's or 60's. My personal opinion of Brian Williams will not be stated here because I can not find anything nice to say about him, or the news organization he represents.

JR