Climate change .. the SCAM.

shut up chimp. i have you on ignore. you have me on ignore. i didn't bump this thread to read more of your "bad science" crap.

lol what a retard Ivan is .. i'll never read his crap yet he posts as if i will. ahahaha

i bumped it for some new blood in the debate. Speedy .. you are at bat! go for it!

ManBearPig has been lying to us... This is from 2011

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/09/...le-experiment/


Video analysis and scene replication suggests that Al Gore’s Climate Reality Project fabricated their Climate 101 video “Simple Experiment”
Anthony Watts / September 28, 2011

It has been over a week now since the Gore-a-thon aka “24 hours of climate reality”. The front page of the Climate Reality Project has changed from “live mode” to offering clips of video shown during the 24 hour presentation. Note the circled video on the front page below Mr. Gore. I’ve discovered that by watching carefully it reveals an “inconvenient truth” of the worst kind.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the...?siteid=yhoof2

Yeah, this is all about sharpening the swimming skills of polar bears.

Do they have polar bears in Bulgaria? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

probably...

Polar Bears are Brown Bears in white (or rather transparent hair)

probably...

Polar Bears are Brown Bears in white (or rather transparent hair) Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Asswipe is just a pig. A stupid, lazy, cockstalking, cocksucking, barrow pig.

ManBearPig has been lying to us... This is from 2011

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/09/...le-experiment/


Video analysis and scene replication suggests that Al Gore’s Climate Reality Project fabricated their Climate 101 video “Simple Experiment”
Anthony Watts / September 28, 2011



Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

ahahahaha. ManBearPig? is he related to Puppymonkeybaby?

probably the oddest SuperBowl ad in recent memory ...



anyway .. back to the topic at hand.

http://www.independent.org/store/boo...FQmqaQod2dQOSg

S. Fred Singer is a distinguished astrophysicist who has taken a hard, scientific look at the evidence. In this book, Dr. Singer explores the inaccuracies in historical climate data, the limitations of attempting to model climate on computers, solar variability and its impact on climate, the effects of clouds, ocean currents, and sea levels on global climate, and factors that could mitigate any human impacts on world climate.

Singer’s masterful analysis decisively shows that the pessimistic, and often alarming, global warming scenarios depicted in the media have no scientific basis. In fact, he finds that many aspects of any global warming, such as a longer growing season for food and a reduced need to use fossil fuels for heating, would actually have a positive impact on the human race. Further, Singer notes how many proposed “solutions” to the global warming “crisis” (like “carbon” taxes) would have severe consequences for economically disadvantaged groups and nations.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I've not seen that render of what america looked like with higher sea levels. I do kno that the colorado canyons were underwater and were created by currents of water rubbing the mountain sides. there were some hand drawing that crudely showed half of america prolly looked underwater..

how long ago was this?

I concur with this guy. He's been around for a long time. He doesn't beat his chest but he's absolutely brilliant according to Albert Einstien. Amongst others.

https://e360.yale.edu/digest/with-fr...-skeptic/1880/

I've not seen that render of what america looked like with higher sea levels. I do kno that the colorado canyons were underwater and were created by currents of water rubbing the mountain sides. there were some hand drawing that crudely showed half of america prolly looked underwater..

how long ago was this? Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Welcome back!!!

Dyson: I am sure there are. But I don’t know who they are.

I have a lot of friends who think the same way I do. But I am sorry to say that most of them are old, and most of them are not experts. My views are very widely shared.

Anyway, the ideal protagonist I am still looking for. So the answer
YALE E360 INTERVIEWS


Michael Pollan: What’s Wrong With Environmentalism
Elizabeth Kolbert: The Media and Climate Change
Thomas Friedman: Hope in a Hot, Flat Crowded World
Rajendra Pachauri: The World’s Global Warming Challenge
Julienne Stroeve: Tracking the Fallout Of the Arctic's Vanishing Sea Ice
to your question is, I will do the job if nobody else shows up, but I regard it as a duty rather than as a pleasure.

e360: Because it is important for you that people not take drastic actions about a problem that you are not convinced exists?

Dyson: Yes. And I feel very strongly that China and India getting rich is the most important thing that’s going on in the world at present. That’s a real revolution, that the center of gravity of the whole population of the world would be middle class, and that’s a wonderful thing to happen. It would be a shame if we persuade them to stop that just for the sake of a problem that’s not that serious.

And I’m happy every time I see that the Chinese and Indians make a strong statement about going ahead with burning coal. Because that’s what it really depends on, is coal. They can’t do without coal. We could, but they certainly can’t.

So I think it is very important that they should not be under pressure. Luckily they are, in fact, pretty self-confident; (neither) of those countries pays too much attention to us.

But that’s my motivation... Anyhow, I think we have probably said enough.

POSTED ON 04 JUN 2009 IN CLIMATE CLIMATE ENERGY POLICY & POLITICS

This make sense to me. The guy speaks the truth.

I concur with this guy. He's been around for a long time. He doesn't beat his chest but he's absolutely brilliant according to Albert Einstien. Amongst others.

https://e360.yale.edu/digest/with-fr...-skeptic/1880/ Originally Posted by bambino

Dyson Freeman is a great intellect. among his many brilliant proposals is the Dyson Sphere.



it would, of course take huge resource to achieve, if we'd all stop trying to kill ourselves .. maybe we might get there eventually.

Dyson Freeman is a great intellect. among his many brilliant proposals is the Dyson Sphere.



it would, of course take huge resource to achieve, if we'd all stop trying to kill ourselves .. maybe we might get there eventually. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

It's all about economics. Dyson thinks it's better for those poor fucks in China and India to make it to the middle class than some polar bears getting warm. He may have a point. Probably good for the people in WVa , Kentucky, ohio, Pa, too! The people who Hillary and Sanders want to destroy.

It's all about economics. Dyson thinks it's better for those poor fucks in China and India to make it to the middle class than some polar bears getting warm. He may have a point. Probably good for the people in WVa , Kentucky, ohio, Pa, too! The people who Hillary and Sanders want to destroy. Originally Posted by bambino

it's all about world economics. and how it's spent. think of the world today, had Truman, who had the guts to nuke Japan to end WW2, also had the guts to tell Stalin .. "back off Europe, or we'll nuke Moscow"? Cold War ended before it even began.

and backed it up if Stalin had not complied? it was the "naughty list" that caused the Cold War after all. Churchill's greatest mistake. but after all, he grew up in the death throes of the British Empire, why would you expect him not to try to preserve some of it? huge mistake. even if the old adage "The spoils of war belong to the victors" rings true.

what would the World today be like, if the enormous resources pumped into the Military Industrial Complex had been spend on elevating the the Third World out of poverty?

it would be a paradise that Jean Luke Picard could relate to.




but i digress. this is about the fallacy of Climate Change. back on topic ...

http://joeforamerica.com/2015/09/gre...limate-change/

Greatest Hoax of the 21st Century! 98% Scientists DO NOT Believe in Man-Made Climate Change!

Climate Change activists from Al Gore down have been saying for almost a decade that 98% of the Scientific community believe in man-made climate change.But what they fail to tell you is that 98% comes from an equation of 75 out of 77 climate change scientists.

The 98% lie comes from a 2009 American Geophysical Union (AGU) survey consisting of an intentionally brief two-minute, two question online survey sent to 10,257 earth scientists by two researchers at the University of Illinois. Yet it is the main talking point used by the left to prove the Climate Change Hoax!!As Larry Bell writes in Forbes:


“Then of those [3,146 that actually took the survey], only a small subset, just 77 who had been successful in getting more than half of their papers recently accepted by peer-reviewed climate science journals, were considered in their survey statistic. That “98% all scientists” referred to a laughably puny number of 75 of those 77 who answered “yes”.”


Only with Common Core math can you make 75 scientists equal 98% of the entire scientific community!
On the other end, since 1998, more than 31,000 scientists, have announced that “…there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.”


Recently, one of the founders of GreenPeace, Dr. Patrick Moore, (who has a BS in Biology and a PhD in Ecology, wrote
the piece that begins:

“I am skeptical humans are the main cause of climate change and that it will be catastrophic in the near future. There is no scientific proof of this hypothesis, yet we are told “the debate is over” and “the science is settled.””

Yet, Al Gore says it is settled? Well Al Gore lies!


Al Gore claimed that the seas were going to rise and islands would disappear! There were actually 35 lies in his movie “An Inconvenient Truth“.


In fact, in October 2007 the High Court in London had identified nine “errors” in Gore’s movie that were so outrageous that it caused a major upheaval when they wanted to show the movie about climate change in their secondary schools.


The Science and Public Policy Institute issued a detailed report on the 35 lies that the movie told: 35 Inconvenient Truths: The errors in Al Gore’s movie.
Of course with all that money he is making on this hoax, I guess he has to lie at this point:



Global Warming is on it’s deathbed! It seems that the American people are not falling for Al Gore’s lies. A new Gallup poll reveals that only 32% of the public are worried about it a “great deal.” That is back to the level we found in the 80’s which of course was on the heals of the failed Global Cooling hoax.


Maybe it is because there has been no warming for 2 decades now.


Maybe it is because they found out that while Al Gore was claiming the Arctic shelf would be gone by last year, that he failed to mention the Antarctic was growing.


Maybe it is because he said in 2008 that the entire Arctic Shelf would be gone by 2013 and that it is not only not gone, it is growing again. (By 30% in 2013)
Maybe it was because after he claimed in 2008 that the Arctic Ice would be totally gone by 2013, that by 2012, it had already grown by 50%.


Maybe it is because they found out that the scientists were fudging the data on the temperatures.


Maybe it is because they found out that the IPCC (United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) has been lying.
Maybe it is because most of the facts laid out in his movie have since been proven to be lies.


Maybe it is because the American public does not like to be threatened when they exercise their 1st Amendment rights and disagree with him.
Maybe it is because Al Gore recently bought beach front property after claiming the oceans are going to rise 20 ft!


Maybe it is because Barak Obama bought the ‘Magnum P.I.’ ocean front property after warning of catastrophic rising of sea levels.
Maybe it is because Climate models showing global warming have been wrong 95% of the time.


Whatever the reason, people are not really falling for it anymore.


For those who would like to read some good scientific discussion on the topic of climate change, I would suggest, A Discussion of Global Warming and Latest Developments by Dr. Mason Wilson.


Not ONE scientific society related in any way with long term forecasting supports Global Warming.



Michael Loftus recently addressed the lies told by the global warming scare industry about climate change on the TV Comedy, The Flipside with Michael Loftus! The Flipside just started season two and is available every weekend on a station near you!!


Be sure to Like and Follow them on on Facebook – if you dare. No one turned away.
as well.

climate change is a scam the same way cigarettes causes cancer is a scam. Originally Posted by southtown4488

What do you suggest we do about it? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

lawsuit time!!!!

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

ew! that was sick!

don't you have any decency not to post that shit?