Should a "provider" that believes she may have been recently exposed to Herpes of something worse remove herself from the playing field for a period of time?

LMAO.... No... I don't think that should be the first thought of anyone that is responsible and making educated decisions here.....

A provider that announced to the world that she was concerned for such a thing would be damaging her own career.....

Yet.... We've seen exactly that happen....

back to the actual question here.... A provider DOEs state/believe she may have been exposed..... Does she belong here running ads without disclaimers?








LOL.... There are many guys in this community that are far more active than others might believe that choose to keep their personal experiences shared to a limited few with similar tastes or not at all.

People quit reviewing for a variety of reasons....

In regards to motives..... the poll is relevant to a current incident shared publicly here on the board..... There is a dark side to this hobby we all participate in that some may wish never came to light but in order to make informed decisions it needs to be discussed from time to time....

If someone takes a position that they believe they may have been exposed to something yet continues to participate without warning potential partners I believe they are displaying a reckless disregard for everyone's safety here..

Originally Posted by Whispers

"People quit reviewing for a variety of reasons...."
Yup, most important reason in your case is NOTHING to review.



All this bitch ass gossip mongering faux concern for the community trying to remain relevant...

"

All this bitch ass gossip mongering faux concern for the community trying to remain relevant...

Originally Posted by Observing

at least it's a "word up" as to which guy to avoid!!!

My question is when did the provider EVER say it was UNCONSENSUAL sex? When did it NOT become her responsibility to make sure that a condum was on? Was she unconscious, was she high,was she drunk,was she forced,was coherence, was she under any type of duress?

They talked about the risk of unprotected sex. Lots of people talk about the fact that they need to eat better, work out, ect. Then they go get junk food at taco bell.

What if you are told at the doctors that you need to cut down on salt. That person eats lots salted peanuts and then has a heart attack. Can that person then sue the doctor and/or that company because the person eat those salted peanuts?

Life's lessons suck because often they are painful and embarrassing. If life's lessons didn't suck to go though we wouldn't remember them and learn from our mistakes. Both parties need to understand and acknowledge that someone upstairs thought it was time for both of them to LEARN a lesson. Also you don't have sex with someone willing and as your walking out the door with the money call it something else. She made the conscious and willing choice not to check and make sure. People have a mouth and an asshole so that we can talk all the shit we want. We have a brain to actually do actions.

at least it's a "word up" as to which guy to avoid!!! Originally Posted by nuglet

If you were a woman would you climb in the sack with someone that fat?
Throw in the gossipy little bitch ass behavior and it's a no brainer.
Hence no reviews!

Says the one with 0 reviews.
22 is a lot more than 0.

Says the one with 0 reviews.
22 is a lot more than 0. Originally Posted by bottoms up

How does it feel to be Whispers little runner boy/lap dog/bitch?

He carries on 'bout how much hawt young pussy he says he slays.
I don't.

Yeah, what is it exactly you do around here other than post about other guys homo?
Maybe you should go out and get some pussy, and stop having dick on your mind?
Maybe you should call me Ricky again, everyone seems so interested in your posts?

Yeah, what is it exactly you do around here other than post about other guys homo?
Maybe you should go out and get some pussy, and stop having dick on your mind?
Maybe you should call me Ricky again, everyone seems so interested in your posts? Originally Posted by bottoms up

You go little Ricky poo!

As a responsible and considerate adult, of course one should exercise such caution in such a situation.

However, are you really going to trust that? The hobby has many risks involved with it, one of which is this issue.

If it concerns you that much, it is perhaps better that you refrain from engaging in it.

Also, it is good idea for anyone having sex on the regular with multiple partners (no matter in what kind of scenario) to get tested every 3 months.

.....

However, are you really going to trust that? Originally Posted by Victoria of Houston

Nope..... Any member caught up in any controversy surrounding her/his health should simply be avoided. Your other choices far outweigh the risks.....

.....

If it concerns you that much, it is perhaps better that you refrain from engaging in it. Originally Posted by Victoria of Houston

The key to refrain from engaging in an activity with a person that presents additional risk lies in your ability to identify those that do.

It would be overreacting to rule out every whore/john just because a few whores/johns have risked their health in some manner that could have been avoided.

Nope..... Any member caught up in any controversy surrounding her/his health should simply be avoided. Your other choices far outweigh the risks.....



The key to refrain from engaging in an activity with a person that presents additional risk lies in your ability to identify those that do.

It would be overreacting to rule out every whore/john just because a few whores/johns have risked their health in some manner that could have been avoided. Originally Posted by Whispers

I agree with your statements. If one knows for sure or has a strong suspicion about someone in particular, then yes, that person should be avoided.

However, my point was, the hobby is pretty much anonymous. We don't know each other, where we've been, what we do, etc etc etc, so one must go into every hobby encounter expecting that it carries a certain level of risk. Some can handle that level of risk, some cannot.