Much of the time, yes I do. Not always. I understand journalism and the First Amendment. Parler has nothing whatsoever to do with journalism, it's just a conglomeration of people posting unsubstantiated theories and opinions, many harmful. To be accurate the PA Supreme Court is seven Democrats and two Republicans and to reiterate, they voted UNANIMOUSLY to strike down Trump's efforts to disenfranchise millions of voters. Republican courts in other states and Federal courts have done similar.
Originally Posted by IMGTH58
7/2 is worse. State law says votes have to be postmarked by Election Day to be valid. Pa law also demands that officials from both parties inspect the ballots. That didn’t happen in certain precincts. That’s a form of disenfranchisement too. Correcting democrat ballots but not Republican ballots? That happened too. Lots of disenfranchisement going on in Pa. No matter what Wolf or the court says. Alito said as much. It might get to SCOTUS. So, Pa ruling may not matter. Parler is like Twitter without censorship. What I’ve posted from there is true. Michigan is going to allow forensic inspections of 22 dominion machines. It’s easier to get news there than trying to google things that google censors. If your an objective person, 94% of negative reporting on Trump is bullshit. Not because it’s Trump, it’s just wrong. Denying voters any information on the Hunter Biden fiasco is a form of disenfranchisement too. 17% of Biden voters said they wouldn’t have voted for him if they knew about Hunters laptop. If you think this election was free of hanky Panky, fine. It’s your opinion. You’re entitled to it. I’m not buying it. That’s my opinion.
As Joseph Stalin once said “ Those who cast votes don’t decide anything. Those who count the votes decide everything”. It certainly worked for him. Putin, Castro, Chavez, Xi and Rocketman. For the sake of the country, things should be investigated to restore any confidence in elections going forward.