Being tarred and feathered would be too nice for these fucking hypocrites
Am I missing sarcasm here? Originally Posted by BTHUDER99Gburg was an attorney for planned parenthood, how can someone who worked for the countries largest provider of abortions not show bias in a case involving that?
Gburg was an attorney for planned parenthood, how can someone who worked for the countries largest provider of abortions not show bias in a case involving that? Originally Posted by DevoAll the justices have biases... most of the time that's the reason they're even nominated. If they didn't have biases why would we even note which ones were conservative/liberal leaning?
All the justices have biases... most of the time that's the reason they're even nominated. If they didn't have biases why would we even note which ones were conservative/liberal leaning?That used to be the way the SCOTUS worked, they picked candidates and both sides approved them.
Now can a justice make a decision based on the law should be the question which is why we have these hearings. Over the last 30 years, RBG had the greatest confirmation margin so maybe you should complain to one of those people about her "bias." Originally Posted by BTHUDER99
Now, your side is dragging loony tunes out of the woodwork to make baseless accusations against any R male candidate, and I was surprised they didn't bring in a High School basketball team that claimed they gang banged ACB, while she was in high school. Originally Posted by DevoGive me a break. Roberts, Alito, and Gorsuch were all confirmed without any allegations. Thomas would have been too except for a leaked interview right before the vote. So maybe it's not a witch hunt against any R male candidate. You can't even say it's biased against R males in particular because the dems only nominated 2 males in that time period and only one got a hearing.