
I thought he wasn't relevant anymore. Why do you keep trying to drag Trump back into the White House? Originally Posted by texassapperNo, bubba. That's what you're trying to do.
Thanks for the enlightenment, Dilbert.You should go back to the Philippines. You’re fake, phony and false.
Didn't know they had prior leaks there in the past.
ESPECIALLY on the same case.
Not that leaks are bad. Pentagon Papers, Watergate, Pandora Papers, etc. Just as long as the story is gotten (sp) with journalistic ethics. Not the way Assange did.
From this latest creampuff, it just shows how useless the nomination process is. If anything at all, a few of those soon to be SCOTUS judges perjured themselves in front of Congress.
That there is some high integrity. Originally Posted by Precious_b
You should go back to the Philippines. You’re fake, phony and false. Originally Posted by bambinoWhen was I there?
When was I there?Weren’t you Firefighter in a previous life? Or was that another Libtard with multiple handles?
Not a bad idea. Know someone who retired there and lives like a king.
...and then there is the Hobby.
Not that anyone pandering their POV sans facts on this section of the site would know anything about. Originally Posted by Precious_b
No, bubba. That's what you're trying to do.
And that wall, posted by your butt buddy -- it's to keep assholes from "just following orders" when Trump tells them to fight like hell.
Let THAT sink in for a moment.
Enjoy your next tour of the Capitol. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
...Not that anyone pandering their POV sans facts on this section of the site would know anything about. Originally Posted by Precious_b
Weren’t you Firefighter in a previous life? Or was that another Libtard with multiple handles? Originally Posted by bambinoThank you for supplying the proof to my statement.
Thank you for supplying the proof to my statement.
Stick to being a blowhard in the political section,.
When you stray from this section, telegram/teletype/smoke signal/whatever site that is void of non-leaning, highly factual content means nothing. Sorta like that twit site.
Come back to me when you can back up something with a hard fact though.Originally Posted by Precious_b
is that the same proof that the Republicans paid for the Steele dossier?The look into Trumps Russian ties started before the Steel dossier.
thank you valued poster
bahahahahaahhaaaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid