I did not ask for getting the infraction appealed but asked the question if having the name of the website that host an image, for instance imagecoast.com, on a picture is a violation that gets an image removed ?
That is certainly a relevant question to ask since some image hosting websites put their site on images hosted.
But that wasn’t answered by your post.
Originally Posted by myren1900
I did not ask for getting the infraction appealed. Appealed is the wrong word. Don't you mean you did not send a message back to those who made the judgement call? You are a strange guy! This is not a place where you make a case to the public in an attempt to control those who sit in judgement of your mistake. Talk about it to them, it is their judgement of you.
I have sent a private email letter back to the moderators several times and they have usually, not always, agreeded. One of the calls got me banded, due to a simple mistake that would take others to a web site: they were right and I had to live with it. Could you have trimmed the web site from the picture with an image caputre off just part of the picture; or did you, perhaps, not know how to do that simple computer command?
It was wrong of you to take the situation public. You do not have that right, and it will only make the opinion of you by others lower.