Where's tigbitties?Your words, not mine. I can see where you would think that way but I would not consider using you as any kind of reference.
Seems like he bumped his own thread (after it lay dormant for almost 2 months) just to take a swipe at Tiny. Then he disappeared.
Tigbitties says he's the only guy here who understands New York law.
I never said this or implied it. What I said was, in response to a WK post:You don't know anything about New York law or any law.:
No mention that I alone understand NY laws. It's obvious you don't.
Apparently most of what I said. You are full of shit. You are having problems with words most people learned long ago. Like "insist". You show your lack of character and lack of reading comprehension with every lie you tell.
What am I missing?
Perhaps the OP can elucidate this. He keeps insisting nobody else knows anything about NY state law. Originally Posted by lustylad
All you had to was read the indictment. I know you don't like to read long articles but you shouldn't wear your ignorance like a badge of honor.
And what is the specific New York state law/statute he was charged with violating? I would hope it isn't as flaky and phony as the New York Executive Law 63(12) that NY State AG Tish James abused to seize all of his business assets. Originally Posted by lustylad
Here is a snippet for you.
By this indictment, accuses the defendant of the crime of FALSIFYING BUSINESS RECORDS IN THE FIRST DEGREE, in violation of Penal Law §175.10, committed as follows:The defendant, in the County of New York and elsewhere, on or about February 14, 2017,with intent to defraud and intent to commit another crime and aid and conceal the commission there of, made and caused a false entry in the business records of an enterprise, to wit, an invoice from Michael Cohen dated February 14, 2017, marked as a record of the Donald J. Trump Revocable Trust, and kept and maintained by the Trump Organization.
Did you notice the statue number in bold? That is the same charge number for all 34 counts. That is the first count.
What are you talking about? Did he fuck a porn star? Of course he did! Nobody is denying that (except trump). Old news.Convince you? Why would I try to convince you? You're entitled to your own opinion. Just another example of you presenting opinion as fact. We're used to you doing that.
You call him a felon, yet I'm not even past the misdemeanor stage.
I can't figure out exactly what "it" is that he was accused of and convicted for. Of course you can't. All you had to do was read the indictment. No big deal, It has a lot of big words though.
I have no problem letting every voter decide whether fucking a porn star while your wife is sitting back home preggo makes you unfit for elective office. That's a question to be answered at the ballot box, not in a courtroom.
IMO it makes trump a cad, but not a felon.
Now go ahead and try to convince me otherwise.Originally Posted by lustylad
You gotta love people who quote themselves. Especially ones who pretend they know what they're talking about. I like you just the way you are. Stupid.
You call him a felon, yet I'm not even past the misdemeanor stage.
I can't figure out exactly what "it" is that he was accused of and convicted for.
You keep saying that. That's one of the few things you say that I believe (although you lie about so many other things).
Like I've said many times, all you had to do was read the indictment
Now go ahead and try to convince me otherwise.Originally Posted by lustylad
Ok, lemme see if I understand all this correctly...Why would I ask you anything?
Trumpy was found guilty of a misdemeanor that no one here can explain. Something about falsifying business records because he paid his lawyer to obtain NDAs. Then somehow through the magical legal alchemy of Alvin Bragg and Juan Merchan, this alleged misdemeanor was transformed into a felony. No one here can explain that either. Meanwhile, the trump haters keep bleating about his being convicted of "34 felonies" because he happened to pay his lawyer in 34 instalments lol.
Now we learn the sentence or punishment meted out by Judge Merchan for this vague, arbitrary, non-specific, indecipherable, misdemeanor-masquerading-as-a-felony "crime" is... wait for it... (drumroll) ... UNCONDITIONAL DISCHARGE!
That's it? No jail time. No probation. No community service. No fine. No wrist slap. No nothing.
Anyone care to explain that?Explain something to you? No thanks.
Sounds more like UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER by Judge Merchan, if you ask me. Originally Posted by lustylad
Your ignorance is legendary.
If the OP is such an expert, why won't he come back and explain to the rest of us legal ignoramuses exactly what felonious crime trump was "convicted" of? Originally Posted by lustylad
Nobody believes that horseshit, or cares. All that work and money just to apply the label and still getting crushed in the election must be disheartening. Originally Posted by JacuzzmePlease support your work.
Please support your work.What? More voted for Trump than Camela 49.9% to 48.4% winning the electoral and popular votes.
Did a majority of voters pick Donald Trump?
What percentage of the popular vote did Trump get?
Did a majority of voters pick someone other than Donald Trump? Originally Posted by RX792P