It
Originally Posted by LGBBQandT
there wasn't any cogent argument you made worth quoting, but I am responding to your post.
there is a ton of backstory drama regarding the provider and the reviewer. Anyone can justify anything when omitting facts.
Reviewer's complaints, Provider's complaints - at the core of it is
full price was paid with the EXPECTATION of full service.
If the reviewer had been apprised that he should change his EXPECTATION,
THEN there would be a leg to stand on why the provider was justified.
Hey, if you don't shower I can only give you a handjob, okay?
instead, she thought the client should be a mind reader, then act surprised when he felt short-changed.
She DIDN'T because she very clearly had the INTENTION of keeping the encounter, keeping the full rate and not fulfilling the expected service. That IS short-changing someone. She knew what she was going to do and purposely didn't want to give the client an opportunity to back out.
Just like all the make-believe you've spouted in your emotional tirade post, the provider listing all her grievances that happened this week (stubbed her toe, burnt her toast, etc) have NOTHING to do with the encounter or the argument being made here. It is evidence of the provider readily using manipulation to justify her actions ("
feel bad for me because i got short changed by a completely different person) and also has no problems with creating delusional arguments to support her cause ("
the provider should PAY the reviewer")
These threads always bring out the reactionary simps that feel the need to vociferously defend their make believe friend for hire.
I don't even have an issue with the provider. I DO have an issue with them misrepresenting reality, which is only causing them more harm and pain