The nuthin burger has now been officially exposed as another Atlantic Hoax.
@PeteHegseth
So, let’s me get this straight. The Atlantic released the so-called “war plans” and those “plans” include: No names. No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods. And no classified information.
Those are some really shitty war plans.
This only proves one thing: Jeff Goldberg has never seen a war plan or an “attack plan” (as he now calls it). Not even close.
As I type this, my team and I are traveling the INDOPACOM region, meeting w/ Commanders (the guys who make REAL “war plans”) and talking to troops.
We will continue to do our job, while the media does what it does best: peddle hoaxes.
- Flair4Drama
- 03-26-2025, 11:43 AM
- Flair4Drama
- 03-26-2025, 11:45 AM
Oh... and lost in the liberal tears, the mission was a success. Unlike Hillary's Bengazi and Biden's Afghanistan
- FBSMLUVR
- 03-26-2025, 02:56 PM
Oh... and lost in the liberal tears, the mission was a success. Unlike Hillary's Bengazi and Biden's Afghanistan Originally Posted by Flair4DramaShhh…Libs don’t like facts, only conspiracy theories & “gotcha moments” which is what they’re hoping this will be.
Gawd forbid they celebrate any success the Trump Admin has. The mission was a success, and no American military folks were injured/killed. Unlike in Afghanistan where 13 U.S. military service members were killed. For some reason…and maybe my memory is not what it used to be…but I don’t recall one Dem or Lib calling for the resignation or firing of anyone over the debacle that the Afghanistan withdrawal certainly was.
- The_Waco_Kid
- 03-26-2025, 05:31 PM
nothing burger indeed
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...story-n2654510
Did You Notice What Vanished From The Atlantic's Narrative About the Hegseth Signal Story?
The Atlantic felt their story was dying. The Trump administration said no classified war plans were discussed in the Signal chat story that’s captured the hyper-regional confines of liberal America. It looks like a nothing burger vis-à-vis a severe breach in classified information, though still an unforced error on behalf of top officials. To recap, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally added to a group chat on the encrypted messenger app, which was pre-downloaded on the devices of those involved in the chat, which included CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, and Vice President JD Vance.
https://x.com/Taylor47/status/1904874968581632040
The Atlantic has already abandoned their bullshit “war plans” narrative, and in releasing the full chat , they concede they LIED to perpetuate yet ANOTHER hoax on the American people. What scumbags!
The hook was that classified war plans were discussed, and Mr. Ratcliffe shot down a claim. There was nothing classified, Jeff, so release the texts. At first, he decided not to do it, simply claiming his detractors were wrong—a typical response when fake news is knowingly peddled.
So, The Atlantic opted to publish the text they felt was classified, though it wasn’t, and two things were clear: these aren’t war plans, and that narrative has conspicuously vanished.
https://x.com/MostlyPeacefull/status...story-n2654510
Notice the narrative shift. First it was “top secret”, then it was “classified”, now it’s “sensitive”
https://x.com/townhallcom/status/1904896703322268149
Are these “war plans?”
https://x.com/davereaboi/status/1904...story-n2654510
Ok so the Atlantic released what they call the “war plans”—they’re depending on people not knowing (or caring) what this is, but to refer to it that way is a stretch. There’s nothing specific here, other than times at which events will occur. A leak of this kind could alert the enemy, but doesn’t tell them anything about what’s coming, where or how to prepare for it. Nothingburger.
Now, this isn’t a one-sided deal. Again, this was a brutal, unforced error, adding a known Trump-hater to this chat. This administration dodged a significant bullet and was lucky that no classified information was disclosed. Then again, in the chats, all the principals are aware of the “high side” lines of communications, secure platforms where deeper discussions could occur.
The chats are real, so it’s not a hoax, but the ‘they disclosed classified war plans’ narrative is fake news and hyper-sensationalized. The White House did well to notice how the words “war plans” got stealth edited in the new disclosures, pointing to a tacit acknowledgement that the publication got ahead of their skis on this one, which is a common trait at The Atlantic:
https://x.com/TomBevanRCP/status/190...story-n2654510
Many things can be true at once. 1) Jeffrey Goldberg is a clear Trump hater. 2) Goldberg has published sensationalized accounts in the past that have been disputed by people with first-hand knowledge. 3) He was added to this chat and has receipts, so it’s not a hoax.
Editor's Note: This leaked Signal chat is a non-scandal, and we need to focus on the real issues, not the Regime Media and Democrats' invented outrage.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattve...story-n2654510
Did You Notice What Vanished From The Atlantic's Narrative About the Hegseth Signal Story?
The Atlantic felt their story was dying. The Trump administration said no classified war plans were discussed in the Signal chat story that’s captured the hyper-regional confines of liberal America. It looks like a nothing burger vis-à-vis a severe breach in classified information, though still an unforced error on behalf of top officials. To recap, The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg was accidentally added to a group chat on the encrypted messenger app, which was pre-downloaded on the devices of those involved in the chat, which included CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, and Vice President JD Vance.
https://x.com/Taylor47/status/1904874968581632040
The Atlantic has already abandoned their bullshit “war plans” narrative, and in releasing the full chat , they concede they LIED to perpetuate yet ANOTHER hoax on the American people. What scumbags!
The hook was that classified war plans were discussed, and Mr. Ratcliffe shot down a claim. There was nothing classified, Jeff, so release the texts. At first, he decided not to do it, simply claiming his detractors were wrong—a typical response when fake news is knowingly peddled.
So, The Atlantic opted to publish the text they felt was classified, though it wasn’t, and two things were clear: these aren’t war plans, and that narrative has conspicuously vanished.
https://x.com/MostlyPeacefull/status...story-n2654510
Notice the narrative shift. First it was “top secret”, then it was “classified”, now it’s “sensitive”
https://x.com/townhallcom/status/1904896703322268149
Are these “war plans?”
https://x.com/davereaboi/status/1904...story-n2654510
Ok so the Atlantic released what they call the “war plans”—they’re depending on people not knowing (or caring) what this is, but to refer to it that way is a stretch. There’s nothing specific here, other than times at which events will occur. A leak of this kind could alert the enemy, but doesn’t tell them anything about what’s coming, where or how to prepare for it. Nothingburger.
Now, this isn’t a one-sided deal. Again, this was a brutal, unforced error, adding a known Trump-hater to this chat. This administration dodged a significant bullet and was lucky that no classified information was disclosed. Then again, in the chats, all the principals are aware of the “high side” lines of communications, secure platforms where deeper discussions could occur.
The chats are real, so it’s not a hoax, but the ‘they disclosed classified war plans’ narrative is fake news and hyper-sensationalized. The White House did well to notice how the words “war plans” got stealth edited in the new disclosures, pointing to a tacit acknowledgement that the publication got ahead of their skis on this one, which is a common trait at The Atlantic:
https://x.com/TomBevanRCP/status/190...story-n2654510
Many things can be true at once. 1) Jeffrey Goldberg is a clear Trump hater. 2) Goldberg has published sensationalized accounts in the past that have been disputed by people with first-hand knowledge. 3) He was added to this chat and has receipts, so it’s not a hoax.
Editor's Note: This leaked Signal chat is a non-scandal, and we need to focus on the real issues, not the Regime Media and Democrats' invented outrage.
- Flair4Drama
- 03-29-2025, 08:38 AM
Terry Foster
@fuzzyfamily1
Biden allowed a CCP Spy Balloon to steal sensitive data from our Military Bases
WHERE was MSM & Democrat Indignation
The Attack on the Houthi's who are funded by Iran after Joe refused to ENFORCE Sanctions on Iran was a SUCCESS
@fuzzyfamily1
Biden allowed a CCP Spy Balloon to steal sensitive data from our Military Bases
WHERE was MSM & Democrat Indignation
The Attack on the Houthi's who are funded by Iran after Joe refused to ENFORCE Sanctions on Iran was a SUCCESS
- I-drink-pinneapple-juice
- 03-30-2025, 06:29 AM
In our country today you can find any news report claiming anything you want to believe is true, all you gotta do is decide what you want to believe then go find the source that will report that as a fact... there is very little regard for the actual truth among our "reporters" and do not think this only applies to the "other side", it's also true of whatever you believe!
That's why it's so important, when you see a story, before you accept it, go actively searching for the opposing side. Reporters won't tell us the truth so you gotta actively look for it yourself. As with most cases, the actual truth is usually somewhere in between the two sides of the story-keep searching!
There used to be a doctrine in America that said reporters had to report on both sides of the story, they don't even try anymore, so you gotta do the work yourself it's becoming more difficult to be an American!
That's why it's so important, when you see a story, before you accept it, go actively searching for the opposing side. Reporters won't tell us the truth so you gotta actively look for it yourself. As with most cases, the actual truth is usually somewhere in between the two sides of the story-keep searching!
There used to be a doctrine in America that said reporters had to report on both sides of the story, they don't even try anymore, so you gotta do the work yourself it's becoming more difficult to be an American!
- R.M.
- 03-30-2025, 08:47 AM
- elghund
- 03-30-2025, 12:33 PM
Except……a major Trump supporter thinks it’s a something burger…..
https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-kno...ration-signal/
https://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-kno...ration-signal/