Amateur Hour

^^^^

+1

any vulnerability with signal was not a factor here. again, a staffer invited someone, this editor for The Atlantic, to the secure chat. and your own article said "days before" so what should they have done to conduct this meeting? download Microsoft Skype? no better than signal. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Wow, Kid, you must have selective hearing and comprehension. Days prior to the Group Chat, the Pentagon said that Signal wasn’t secure. Yet, you still say it was a secure chat. I don’t know why they didn’t just do what officials did in the old days, in-person meetings, I don’t know, I don’t get paid the big bucks. But G Hell , idk, security…maybe not where communication can be compromised.

Woooooo! Wooooo! Way to show your ignorance!

Y’all know that the White House is figuratively covered in ketchup right now lmao

Meanwhile, Stefanik is crying because she’s not moving on up

Wow, Kid, you must have selective hearing and comprehension. Days prior to the Group Chat, the Pentagon said that Signal wasn’t secure. Yet, you still say it was a secure chat. I don’t know why they didn’t just do what officials did in the old days, in-person meetings, I don’t know, I don’t get paid the big bucks. But G Hell , idk, security…maybe not where communication can be compromised.

Woooooo! Wooooo! Way to show your ignorance! Originally Posted by Presj22

lol the Pentagon didn't say signal wasn't secure. they said, like every app including this rather outdated bbs software, it might be exploited.


in the case of the meeting, there was no hack involved. Waltz invited a contact he shouldn't have.


watching the usual suspects try to make a big deal out of a nothingburger is amusing.


btw still waiting for you or anyone else to review The Atlantic's actual log which i posted for all that "top secret" material .. you know .. the smoking gun that doesn't exist.

lol the Pentagon didn't say signal wasn't secure. they said, like every app including this rather outdated bbs software, it might be exploited.


in the case of the meeting, there was no hack involved. Waltz invited a contact he shouldn't have.


watching the usual suspects try to make a big deal out of a nothingburger is amusing.


btw still waiting for you or anyone else to review The Atlantic's actual log which i posted for all that "top secret" material .. you know .. the smoking gun that doesn't exist. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

https://www.businessinsider.com/trum...ce=chatgpt.com


Oh yeah? Some others seem to disagree. You might think, “If you say so”.

https://www.businessinsider.com/trum...ce=chatgpt.com


Oh yeah? Some others seem to disagree. You might think, “If you say so”. Originally Posted by Presj22

two things ... paywall and he's full of shit.


post the article if you think there's a point here.


does your so called intel expert know nothing even remotely top secret was texted into the chat?



apparently not!

Some of y’all might think of this as a “nothing burger”, but here we are still talking about it, and quite frankly, it’s a double quarter cheeseBURGER with a Diet Pepsi!