Female Fencer Refuses To Fight a Biological Male And Takes A Knee To Boycott The Competition. When Will Democrats Stop Supporting Men In Women's Sports?

I But I don't disagree some may have mental issues. Just look at our President, he was born rich and at 80 is still fighting the mental trauma of having a little mushroom dick. Originally Posted by 69in2it69

I wasn't aware you knew the president on such an intimate basis. Please enlighten us on your first hand knowledge of his 'little mushroom dick'.
Back on topic, as long as the person is over 18, I don't care what they do or who they do it with. But if you're a guy, don't go following one of my female family members in the restroom. However none of this gay or transgender crap is anything I'm even remotely interested in. I had a lavender gay co-worker and we talked about his being a gay person and I never judged him, but he knew that I was a heterosexual, so we had our boundaries set when we talked about his being gay. Out of compassion I wanted to feel sorry for him, however he was very promiscuous and enjoyed the gay life style. So as long as his partners were adults and they enjoyed doing their thing, who was I to judge?


Him and his partner were 'swingers' and happily married and he mentioned a couple of times the divorce rate between heterosexual partners was 40-50%, while the divorce rates of gay men was about half of that.

DJ: Thans for returning the discussion to the topic. iI agree with much of what you say.

Any biological male that thinks he is a female, and the reverse as well, has a serious mental problem. The medical diagnosis is "Gender Dysphoria". This condition is actually quite rare. They need Psychological and psychiatric therapy. Many today who say they have this disorder are deeply disturbed in some other way, but do not hae gender dysphoria.

One tragedy of our time is the number of young people. of both sees, who have been convinced by others that they must be given strong hormones and have their reproductive organs surgically removed . . .only to later on regret the transition . . .which is traversable and life-long.

Thank you doc.

You’ve hit the nail on the head …. NOT!

And the credentials that would alow one to make a credible challenge are held by who?

The title of the thread includes

“When Will Democrats Stop Supporting Men In Women's Sports?”

Do you have any statements by mainstream democrats supporting men in women’s sports? Does the government have any legitimate interest or legal authority to regulate women’s sports? Originally Posted by txdot-guy

I think they spoke pretty loudly when every democratic in the senate voted against senate bill 9.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/sports/col...ts/ar-AA1AbSMa

If someone claims to be and steadfastly insists that they are Napoleon Bonapart re-incarnated and so, are DeFacto emperor of France, one needs no credentials to determine that they have mental problems.

Everyone in the world, excerpt the Democrst;s shills on the legacy news outlets, could see that then President Biden was, to put it mildly, not the man he had been. Most folks with eyes could see that he was ffected by some condition that resulted in a progressive cognative decline. No reasonable person, regardless of credentials, should have been as "shocked" at his debate [performance as the leftists said they were.

With all of that said as preamble: In like manner, anyone with few years of life experience as an adult should be able to perceive that there are mental illness aspects at the roots of the males-who-think-they-are-women thing, and itys female converse.

If you say so.

Disparaging sarcastic or condescending dismissal does not demonstrate that a statement is incorrect.

Disparaging sarcastic or condescending dismissal does not demonstrate that a statement is incorrect. Originally Posted by ICU 812

I beg to differ.

My opinion is that chick had a right to boycott. Right or wrong.....
Although flat out not competing is a lil chicken shit

Disparaging sarcastic or condescending dismissal does not demonstrate that a statement is incorrect. Originally Posted by ICU 812

Your opinion is just that, an opinion. It’s your say so.

If you don’t understand that, then everything you hear is sarcastic, disparaging or condescending. (Kinda already is, eh?)

We get it, you have problems with transgendered individuals because … science? This isn’t about fencing. (Fencing???). Or science.

It’s about marginalizing others, which has long been the GOP approach to the hearts and minds of paranoid white men. Anybody different is mentally ill?? That is your unqualified opinion, and only that.

I agree she had every right to take a knee, just like that quarterback fella whose name was like poison to MAGA. But it should be up to the sport to manage themselves, not the mob.

And not “science.” Or the Democrats or the MSM. Was there anyone I missed?

The problem is not wth Trans folks directly, but really with those who are pushing that agenda. The current rash of people who believe that that are other than they who actually are is not like the sudden rise in peanut allergy or celiac disorder.

These folks are unfortunate and profoundly unhappy. If they chose to undergo the irreversible sergical removal their reproductive organs that is their personal business. If a family member, I would make strong attempts to influence them otherwise and explore alternative therapies. But adults can do whatever thy want with their bodies, including body piercing, getting a tattoo or even abortion.

But my objection is when that whole mess is thrust onto others. In the case put orward in this thread, there is no place in sports for a biologicl to physically oppose a biologicl female.

Some believe that MAGAs are thrusting their agenda on marginalized populations. And successfully and viciously persecuting others for political gain.

Seems like we have this discussion in every trans thread that is posted.

The party of "truth, justice and the American way" doesn't believe in any of those things.

Some believe that MAGAs are thrusting their agenda on marginalized populations. And successfully and viciously persecuting others for political gain.

Seems like we have this discussion in every trans thread that is posted.

The party of "truth, justice and the American way" doesn't believe in any of those things. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

the majority of people see the Democrats and especially far left socialists pushing an agenda where trans is supreme and can't be challenged in any way including allowing them to complete against biological women in sports.



do you support that?

I beg to differ.

My opinion is that chick had a right to boycott. Right or wrong.....
Although flat out not competing is a lil chicken shit Originally Posted by winn dixie

Yes, let's see how you would like it if some shemale took a scholarship that your daughter qualified for. Let's see how you would react if you 18 year old daughter was playing volleyball against a team with a shemale on it, and the shemale hit the ball so hard and hit your daughter in the face and gave her a concussion.

Yes, let's see how you would like it if some shemale took a scholarship that your daughter qualified for. Let's see how you would react if you 18 year old daughter was playing volleyball against a team with a shemale on it, and the shemale hit the ball so hard and hit your daughter in the face and gave her a concussion.


Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

All those things can happen anyway in sports or life. No matter what the gender.
Fact is. This chick exercised her right to sit out. No issues that I can see