That's not what they're doing, buddy.Are you kidding.
If they were legal and constitutional, nobody would strike them down.
You're a totalitarian's dream, dude.
Because he says so.
TACO! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
The appeals court isn’t the final say. And there will be be more judges who continue to apply the law to Trumps blatantly illegal behavior,
TACO = TRUTH Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
In case you haven't realized it, the Supreme Court is working with the same set of laws as "the Federal Judges."
They are "Federal Judges" too. And they can't "finally put an end to it."
Someone was bitching about "unelected judges" striking down Twitler's executive orders. What that you too? Show me ONE federal judge that's elected.
Skipped civics class in HS much?
TACO! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Now the interesting thing, service appointment for a dependable auto. Small (relatively) price increase coming across the board on new vehicles. Other impacts of tariffs...this company shutting down a factory in TN. That's a state that voted for the lead MAGAt if you don't know geography or what states were carried. Manufacturing jobs LOST by the TACO in chief. Originally Posted by 69in2it69
Although it seems like a long time, it’s only been four months. Four of the longest, darkest, dumbest months in human history.
Perhaps we could call this time The Stupid Ages. The age of illegal tariffs. The “just because you’re immune from prosecution doesn’t mean you have to break the law” Ages. The I’m making Billions while yall fight me Ages.
Time moves excruciatingly slow compared with Trump’s march to the sea… err, prison!
He’ll be fighting these lawsuits long after he’s out of office.
And we’ll be suffering while he continues trying to fuck the world with a mushroom cap. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Radical left corrupt Obama judge Mark A. Barnett of the States Court of International Trade. Mike Johnson now has long list of lawyers and judges to remove from office.Chief Justice John Roberts in a rare public statement laid out the blueprint to remove Obama judges "constitutional checks and balances permit Congress to submit and vote on articles of impeachment for federal judges" Originally Posted by LayingPipe
Are you kidding.It’s the job of the court to determine the constitutionality of the law as well as to provide relief and remedies to those who are damaged by the President breaking the law.
These Judges are ate up with Trump Derangement Syndrome to the extent that they think they can dictate what executive powers the President can use.
SCOTUS will tell them to cease this activity because it is not part of the Constitutional Duties of the Judges. Originally Posted by Jacky S
It’s the job of the court to determine the constitutionality of the law as well as to provide relief and remedies to those who are damaged by the President breaking the law.The Supreme Court can determine if any lower court has ruled correctly on a Executive Decision.
If you don’t agree then have congress change the law or move somewhere where the executive has sole authority. Originally Posted by txdot-guy
Well, hopefully the right thing is done. I won't argue about the legalities because I am not a lawyer. I just believe a stupid old man should not have free reign to ruin many small businesses with his wild ass whims that seem to change depending on his mood. That's not TDS as MAGA clowns call it, that's just common sense.Hear hear!
Many small businesses are taking a beating with these tariffs and his wishy-washy bullshit plan about them. In this great country, one person should not be able to dictate the livelihood of so many with absolute autonomy. Last time I checked, the constitution does not give that much power to anybody just because he has a sharpie and a signature.
Not my call, but hopefully the courts do what is right according to the law and they leave out politics for the people just trying to make a living on their own without having to become a greedy corporate bitch like me.
https://www.uschamber.com/small-busi...-trade-tariffs Originally Posted by Lucas McCain
I agree with the posters who think the United States Court of International Trade ruled correctly when they rendered the judgment that the president didn't have the authority to impose sweeping tariffs pursuant to the declaration of a "national emergency." Further, I believe that congress, not the executive branch, should set tariff policy. I'd love to hear someone articulate a coherent argument as to why granting untrammeled power to a president to dictate such policy is in any way a "conservative viewpoint."From the Constitution of the United States of America:
Note that two of the three judges who ruled against Trump in the international trade court were nominated by Republican presidents (one by Reagan and the other by Trump himself). Maybe they were just trying to save Donald from his own ignorance and impetuousness!
In the same vein, here's conservative business journalist Charlie Gasparino's take on the issue:
https://nypost.com/2025/05/29/busine...rible-tariffs/
(He makes some damned good points!) Originally Posted by Texas Contrarian
Radical left corrupt Obama judge Mark A. Barnett of the States Court of International Trade. Mike Johnson now has long list of lawyers and judges to remove from office.Chief Justice John Roberts in a rare public statement laid out the blueprint to remove Obama judges "constitutional checks and balances permit Congress to submit and vote on articles of impeachment for federal judges" Originally Posted by LayingPipeWhere did you see that?
IOr perhaps theseJudges hate The President so much that they are willing to rule in favor of the rest of the World fucking the United States on trade equity rather than letting President Trump get better trade deals.
Note that two of the three judges who ruled against Trump in the international trade court were nominated by Republican presidents (one by Reagan and the other by Trump himself). Maybe they were just trying to save Donald from his own ignorance and impetuousness!
!) Originally Posted by Texas Contrarian
Or perhaps theseJudges hate The President so much that they are willing to rule in favor of the rest of the World fucking the United States on trade equity rather than letting President Trump get better trade deals.No, NOT perhaps.
After all, the vast majority of the Left are so ate up with TDS that they would would rather have seen a corpse or a cackling idiot be President rather than President Trump. Originally Posted by Jacky S
No, NOT perhaps.As the polls show?
These judges were Republicans, one a Trump appointee. The judiciary doesn't give a shit about America's trade deals. They are there to ensure America adheres to its own rule of law. Your suggestion that judges are somehow against America and want to prevent the Scheissfuhrer from making big beautiful trade deals is just, well ... telling.
The American public doesn't trust Trump to fix nothin, as the polls reveal.
He's a fucking criminal and should be behind bars.
TACO Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
As the polls show?Geez. You guys and your damn poll games to try to win an argument. Just FYI, the polls are always going to change week to week, so they don't mean much IMO unless dumb dumb hits less than 40% in a reputable poll... you can click on the link to read the full article, but MAGAs need to get a grip on what the majority of Americans think about Trump right now.
Opinions vary……
https://katv.com/news/nation-world/t...he-right-track Originally Posted by Jacky S