The DNC on the verge of bankruptcy!!!!

bambino's Avatar
Yeah, Trump dismantled their money grift, USAID, and Democrats with a brain and soul are not donating. There’s infighting and chaos amongst the “leadership”. The party has became a bunch of paid protesters. The DNC may not survive. How delicious!!!!!


https://townhall.com//tipsheet/mattv...-zone-n2659062
lustylad's Avatar
No surprise. Dems can never be trusted with anyone's money. They can only be trusted to MISSPEND it, whether it's taxpayer funds or campaign donations.

Kamala blew through $1 billion during her abbreviated 2024 Presidential campaign, buying celebrity endorsements from Beyonce and Oprah. What a waste that was.

Now they've gone from bad to worse. Recently they asked donors for $20 million to commission a study of why young male voters (the "bros") keep fleeing the Democrat party in droves! Think about that. What kind of greedy, grifting dumbfucks need $20 million to listen to a bunch of focus groups telling them what dumbfucks they are?

This is the party that doesn't know what a woman is - but loves to lecture the bros about what "toxic masculinity" is. Lol.

The DNC's major donors have finally wised up, and the money spigot has dried up.
Don’t forget about money that made its way to Ukraine potentially coming back to the DNC.

The last time the U.S. provided money to Ukraine was in December 2024, when the Biden administration announced $5.9 billion in aid, including $2.05 billion in security assistance and $3.85 billion in budget support. No new funding has been reported since then, as of June 19, 2025.
lustylad's Avatar
Don’t forget about money that made its way to Ukraine potentially coming back to the DNC. Originally Posted by Green_Mountain
If that happened it's a gross violation of campaign finance laws. It's forbidden for our political parties to accept foreign money donations.
I saw some unsubstantiated claims of money going to Ukraine coming back to the DNC via crypto. Nothing concrete that I have seen. Speculative and likely a conspiracy theory.

Is it coincidence or related that USAID funding dries up, Ukraine funding dries up, donors dry up, DNC in financial trouble…..
bambino's Avatar
Didn’t Stacey Abrams get a 2 billion dollar kickback from USAID a month before Bribes left office? Where did that money go? Surely the Democrats have it somewhere.

Ooops, it was frozen by Lee Zeldin!


https://nypost.com/2025/03/27/us-new...investigating/


BAHAHAHA
lustylad's Avatar
Not from USAID. It was supposed to be disbursed by the EPA. Basically political slush fund money. The cover story was the money would be used to help poor households buy new, energy-efficient appliances.

The EPA's entire budget was $9.2 billion last year. Using the EPA, the Biden Dems tried to dole out another $20 billion in corrupt and wasteful slush-fund money to faux greenie benefactors like Stacey Abrams, just as they were leaving office.

When I heard about it from Lee Zeldin, my jaw hit the floor. I still can't fathom how anyone can be so brazenly corrupt using our taxpayer money.
bambino's Avatar
Not from USAID. It was supposed to be disbursed by the EPA. Basically political slush fund money. The cover story was the money would be used to help poor households buy new, energy-efficient appliances.

The EPA's entire budget was $9.2 billion last year. Using the EPA, the Biden Dems tried to dole out another $20 billion in corrupt and wasteful slush-fund money to faux greenie benefactors like Stacey Abrams, just as they were leaving office.

When I heard about it from Lee Zeldin, my jaw hit the floor. I still can't fathom how anyone can be so brazenly corrupt using our taxpayer money. Originally Posted by lustylad
I know, the link said it was from the EPA. It’s all fraud and theft. USAID funded a lot of the DNCs corruption. They never thought it would end.
bambino's Avatar
The Democrats are now saying they are “broke”. Could it be because of fraudulent USAID funds have been cut off to ActBlue and other Democrat groups ?

Of course it is, thanks to @DOGE
Devo's Avatar
  • Devo
  • 06-21-2025, 09:04 PM
Not from USAID. It was supposed to be disbursed by the EPA. Basically political slush fund money. The cover story was the money would be used to help poor households buy new, energy-efficient appliances.

The EPA's entire budget was $9.2 billion last year. Using the EPA, the Biden Dems tried to dole out another $20 billion in corrupt and wasteful slush-fund money to faux greenie benefactors like Stacey Abrams, just as they were leaving office.

When I heard about it from Lee Zeldin, my jaw hit the floor. I still can't fathom how anyone can be so brazenly corrupt using our taxpayer money. Originally Posted by lustylad

Yep, I've seen it before.

Buy the cheapest qualifying device, at the maximum local installation cost.

Example, 200 dollar electric stove to replace a gas model.

5 to 7k to install, rewire etc, with a 100 percent markup to the most expensive stove price and a fake receipt.

Who cares?

Nobody, and even less concern with a bribe.
eyecu2's Avatar
If that happened it's a gross violation of campaign finance laws. It's forbidden for our political parties to accept foreign money donations. Originally Posted by lustylad
Oh but it does come back; SUPER PAC's and others can accept almost anything if it's presented correctly. Meaning create a US corporation or entity or funnel it through them. This happens in MANY MANY ways.

Super PACs: Independent-expenditure-only political committees (often called “Super PACs”) can accept unlimited contributions from individuals, corporations, labor organizations, and other political committees.

Non-contribution Accounts of Hybrid PACs: Hybrid PACs have separate accounts for independent expenditures. Their non-contribution accounts can accept unlimited contributions

some Limited ones:
Political Parties (Generally): Contributions to political parties are generally subject to limits under the Federal Election Campaign Act. The Supreme Court's decision in McCutcheon v. FEC eliminated the aggregate limit an individual can donate to all candidates, PACs, and party committees combined, but it didn't eliminate the per-committee limits.


Essentially- a SUPERPAC can and has created a side by side approach to a campaign- while it may not be the GOP OR DNC, they say the same messaging and have deep pockets and dark money. They can even send out mailers etc. to influence etc. They cannot say they are part of the "marco rubio for Rube of the year", but they can certainly promote the shit out of one candidate and denigrate the other one.

It's how a Majority of dark money filters into elections, but allowing things like conventions to happen without pulling dollars from the political party. THink about all the CPAC conferences where the RED HATS have sharpened their knives in secret. Not really a secret.


BOth sides have them- and right now- the GOP has more of them, or have larger donors, which might beg the question- do donors get special treatment?? FUCK YA they do.


Can a foreign national give money directly - well legally no, but once it's laundered up; it's totally fine. The fact that an exchange of a gift vs. money is one way, and they there are the cost a zillion dollars per plate dinners- which have money provided to the attendee by the "said sponsor".

From the House ways and means committee:

Ways and Means Chairman Jason Smith (MO-08) said:

“Over the last year, the Ways and Means Committee has been investigating concerns about the dangerous influence of foreign money in our elections. It has become clear that loopholes exist in our tax code that foreign donors are able to take advantage of, so they can influence the American electoral process…The Committee’s investigation discovered a particularly disturbing example: a foreign national from Switzerland has given over a hundred million dollars through his tax-exempt organization to Sixteen Thirty Fund, a 501(c)(4), which subsequently distributed $63 million to Super PACs to try and persuade the American voter. According to The New York Times, the Sixteen Thirty Fund is a ‘leading vehicle’ for dark money.


There are plenty of examples of PACs soliciting money for personal gain also for things like embezzlement and off specific things like build the wall, and the big lie,- all which a very easy google search will show that PAC money is rife with nefarious fuckos'.
lustylad's Avatar
Oh but it does come back; SUPER PAC's and others can accept almost anything if it's presented correctly. Meaning create a US corporation or entity or funnel it through them. This happens in MANY MANY ways... Originally Posted by eyecu2

They can't accept FOREIGN money, eye. Everything you just said applies to DOMESTIC funding sources only. Yes, the teachers' unions (NEA, AFT) can make unlimited donations to Democrat super PACs using taxpayer money they received under wasteful and corrupt pandemic relief bills. Just like the UAW recycled the windfall they received from Obama's 2009 auto industry bailout into DNC-run Super PACs. Totally corrupt, but not illegal.

But it's completely ILLEGAL for Ukrainian nationals or entities to donate money to a US political candidate, or campaign, or super PAC. Just as it's illegal for ANY foreigner or foreign entity to do so!

Get it now? You missed the whole point!!