One of These Women Founded Planned Parenthood. Believed Minorities Had Inferior Genetics. And Was Responsible For Millions of Black and Latino Abortions. The Other Woman Wore A Pair Of Jeans On TV. Guess Which One Democrats Call Racist?

Silly Democrats

Yet another TROLL thread from the same poster

So then, in what ways is the OP wrong?

How is Sidney Sweeny wearing jeans as racist as promoting genocidal eugenics of minorities through abortion . . .or is it.

This is an opportunity for progressives to step up and explain it.

Yet another TROLL thread from the same poster Originally Posted by VitaMan

The problem with this argument is that eugenics is not inherently racist and neither is Margaret Sanger or Sydney Sweeney.

From the wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger

Eugenic beliefs in the early 1900s covered a wide spectrum: at one extreme were those who overtly claimed the white race was superior, and wanted to reduce the population of certain other ethnicities. At the other extreme were altruists who wanted to improve the health and well-being of the entire human race. Many eugenicists were somewhere between: they did not categorize ethnicities as superior or inferior; but their list of unfit traits included attributes such as illiteracy or low scores on IQ tests which – even if well-intended – often had the effect of targeting certain ethnicities.


PS. This is a Troll Thread from a Troll Poster.

Yet another TROLL thread from the same poster Originally Posted by VitaMan

Why is this any different than any other thread in here? Every thread is meant to get right and left argueing. Nothing wrong with that but acting like you are above that is hypocritical.

She's cute.

What's her HHR rate?
Where's her incall located?
How's her TCB?

Yet another TROLL thread from the same poster Originally Posted by VitaMan

Yep. All the OPs threads are meant to be troll posts. Non-maggies on here would be better off simply not responding to any of them. Let them just circle jerk on it.


As far as the post is concerned, I can't figure out what it is he gives a fuck about? is this all over some jeans ad? Where does the founder of planned parenthood come in?

She's cute.

What's her HHR rate?
Where's her incall located?
How's her TCB? Originally Posted by GolfNut6372

I think her pic is a little outdated.

Yep. All the OPs threads are meant to be troll posts. Non-maggies on here would be better off simply not responding to any of them. Let them just circle jerk on it.


And yet you continue to respond.


As far as the post is concerned, I can't figure out what it is he gives a fuck about? is this all over some jeans ad? Where does the founder of planned parenthood come in? Originally Posted by Bunter Hiden

It's obvious that he is pointing out the hypocrisy on the left. Maybe you are unable to comprehend that.

She's cute.

What's her HHR rate?
Where's her incall located?
How's her TCB? Originally Posted by GolfNut6372

She goes bareback as well, since she had her own abortion facilities.

Why is this any different than any other thread in here? Every thread is meant to get right and left argueing. Nothing wrong with that but acting like you are above that is hypocritical. Originally Posted by Budman

I think that he was commenting on the obviousness of the OP’s post. It’s sole purpose appears to be to make people mad. Specifically liberals.

I would like to think that debate is the purpose of this forum and not arguing. One is useful and informative and the other just pisses people off.

We should strive for more of the former than the latter.

Bullshit. 99.9% of the threads are meant to piss the other side off. You acting like you are above such games is really sad. You should be embarressed.

Bullshit. 99.9% of the threads are meant to piss the other side off. You acting like you are above such games is really sad. You should be embarressed. Originally Posted by Budman

First of all I'm not acting. I don't think the percentage of the threads are 99%. Everyone should strive to call out bullshit threads like this one and try to not be an internet troll.

Maybe you are just unable to comprehend what the threads are.

Of the Following . . .

#1 - Avoid cases of unprovoked rudeness to others. No place for it here. Yes, with the dynamic nature of the threads and topics, tempers will flare and things will become heated from time to time. You may often encounter individuals who become passionate or emotional when expressing one's opinion or point of view. That's all understood and perfectly acceptable within reason…….but, start slamming or bashing another member and be met with consequences.
#3 - Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums. Follow the Golden Rule and treat others as you wish to be treated yourself. This applies to fellow members as well as staff. We do not require that you have respect for us, but we do require that you treat us respectfully in the public forums. If you feel the need to vent, gripe, or blow off some steam regarding a staff member's action or decision, we ask that you keep it private. Email, RTM, or the PM system would be the appropriate avenue to take in such cases. In cases where you would like to request additional clarity about a staff decision, you are free to pursue an answer in either a public forum or private means of communication. If handled publicly, post your inquiry in a respectful manner.
#4 - Blatant insults or hostility toward another member will be met with staff intervention. This applies to using our coed forums for name calling, personal attacks, or vulgar slang terms to describe fellow members. If you have legitimate concerns about another member here, share them tactfully in the appropriate private forums or with staff.

The following is not permitted on the site:

Insulting Others
Targeting other members for attacks
Harassing other members, groups of members, class of members, etc
Disrespecting other members on the site
General rudeness toward other members on the site