DC Protester Throws Subway Sandwich at DC Cop. Faces Felony Assault Charges by Judge Jeannine Pirro. (Video)

Jacuzzme's Avatar
Misdemeanor Assault Charge.


Imagine going to jail for up to 180 days and pay a fine as much as $1000 for throwing a salami sandwich


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/tru...guy-rcna241563 Originally Posted by CG2014
Not nearly enough.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Not nearly enough. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
Gottdamm right! They should hang the salami slinger!

Can I get a hell yeah??

Thanks for bumping this item of great national importance! And thanks for following it so closely for so long!
Precious_b's Avatar
Couldn't believe they sent over 20 armed officials to his residence to do the arrest. Like how many people charged with a misdemeaner (sp) are treated the same?

Political persecution for sure. And to think he was a member of donnys DOJ. Just another example of eating their own. But the maggies will pull the libby card like they always do with someone who goes against them.
txdot-guy's Avatar
https://archive.ph/DT7JI
Jury finds D.C. ‘sandwich guy’ not guilty of assaulting officer

A jury on Thursday acquitted a D.C. man who was charged with assault after throwing a sandwich at a federal agent during President Donald Trump’s crime crackdown in the capital.

The one-sided food fight, which was captured on video and spread through social media, became a slapstick symbol of resistance to Trump’s summertime takeover of local law enforcement. The defendant, Sean C. Dunn, said he was speaking out against fascism and anti-migrant policies from the Trump administration.

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office said the 37-year-old Air Force veteran was not on trial for protesting but for “throwing a sandwich at a federal officer at point-blank range.” Prosecutors sought to indict Dunn on a felony assault count, but a grand jury rejected that charge, and prosecutors downgraded it to a misdemeanor.

The trial jury in U.S. District Court rejected that charge as well, deliberating for seven hours over two days before returning the not-guilty verdict.

Click the link to read the full article.
CG2014's Avatar
That's typical Washington DC for you.
It was a bullshit charge to begin with and the guy testifying how the sandwich "exploded" when it hit, likely destroyed any credibility he could possibly have had.
Precious_b's Avatar
Any bets that the maggie DOJ is gonna welcome him back with open arms?
txdot-guy's Avatar
It was a bullshit charge to begin with and the guy testifying how the sandwich "exploded" when it hit, likely destroyed any credibility he could possibly have had. Originally Posted by 1blackman1
There is a difference between throwing a sandwich and shooting someone with a potato gun and the jury knew it.
Precious_b's Avatar
Cases that the melange one pushes for ain't having a good track record.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
People aren't as dumb as Donnie wants them to be ...

The perps gotta be glad he wasn't eating Taco Bell, or they'd have sought to disappear him. LOLLING!
adav8s28's Avatar
https://archive.ph/DT7JI
Jury finds D.C. ‘sandwich guy’ not guilty of assaulting officer

A jury on Thursday acquitted a D.C. man who was charged with assault after throwing a sandwich at a federal agent during President Donald Trump’s crime crackdown in the capital.

The one-sided food fight, which was captured on video and spread through social media, became a slapstick symbol of resistance to Trump’s summertime takeover of local law enforcement. The defendant, Sean C. Dunn, said he was speaking out against fascism and anti-migrant policies from the Trump administration.

U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office said the 37-year-old Air Force veteran was not on trial for protesting but for “throwing a sandwich at a federal officer at point-blank range.” Prosecutors sought to indict Dunn on a felony assault count, but a grand jury rejected that charge, and prosecutors downgraded it to a misdemeanor.

The trial jury in U.S. District Court rejected that charge as well, deliberating for seven hours over two days before returning the not-guilty verdict.

Click the link to read the full article. Originally Posted by txdot-guy
The correct verdict was given. Good job by the jury.
Precious_b's Avatar
https://x.com/patrick_ruch2/status/1956054141496627275

Democrats don't want their streets cleaned up of crime and homelessness. Silly Democrats. Originally Posted by HoHound
Who's looking silly?