As has been stated, not a shred of EVIDENCE....5 years in. Originally Posted by 69in2it69... You're a reasonable fellow... No shreds - YET - because
... You're a reasonable fellow... No shreds - YET - becauseMaybe you’re just not persuasive enough, mate?
they won't show us the ballots.
... If I'm wrong about this, they surely coulda just
showed them and Shut Me Up some three years ago.
... WHY haven't they? ...
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
Salty is attempting to review possible fraud and cheating (as he states).Yeah. He lives in the "possible". He gives no hoot to the will of the people that has been shown countless times recounting the votes.
It has no bearing on the Georgia election result of this election cycle. Trump did not win.
What needs to be studied further is what Trump said in his phone calls to election officials. Originally Posted by VitaMan
... You're a reasonable fellow... No shreds - YET - becauseSo, you are salty that the peoples will at the ballot box was honoured by the final person elected to office and was proven with multiple recounts?
they won't show us the ballots.
... If I'm wrong about this, they surely coulda just
showed them and Shut Me Up some three years ago.
... WHY haven't they? ...
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
Maybe you’re just not persuasive enough, mate?
Or stubborn enough.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHSHSHSHS HS Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Because the 2020 presidential election results in several states were quite close, stakeholders took advantage of various state laws and procedures to allege incorrect vote counts and request recounts.
The Trump campaign challenged the vote counts in some states and sought recounts in others. Georgia conducted a risk-limiting audit and two statewide recounts. Wisconsin, at the request of the Trump campaign, recounted votes in Milwaukee and Dane counties. Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania all faced lawsuits that alleged vote-count fraud and sought recounts. Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson agreed to conduct a statewide election audit. The Trump campaign and various Republican organizations, candidates, and voters filed 10 “election contests” in Arizona, Georgia, and Nevada. None of these lawsuits or contests succeeded, and none of the recounts or audits changed the results of the election.
oooppps!
BAHHAHHAAAAAAAAAA
Fani Willis Is Going to Pay Big for Violating State Law While Prosecuting Trump
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/jeff-c...-case-n2653969
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis just got some more horrible news. A judge has ordered her to pay over $54,000 in attorney’s fees and hand over documents her office held in violation of Georgia’s Open Records Act.
Willis withheld important documentation related to the prosecution against President Donald Trump. Ashleigh Merchant, the attorney who filed an open records request to obtain information related to Willis’ inappropriate relationship with another prosecutor she had appointed to Trump’s case, said she had been “completely stonewalled” by Willis’ office in September 2023, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.Merchant said she requested about a dozen sets of records from the DA’s office, including non-disclosure agreements employees are required to sign, a list of attorneys hired by Willis since taking office and receipts for the DA’s contract with a New York-based “media monitoring service.”Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
The ruling, issued Friday by Fulton County Superior Court Judge Rachel Krause, marks a rare win for those seeking access to public records held by government agencies.
Krause determined the DA’s office failed to comply with Georgia’s Open Records Act by withholding public documents and said those failures “were intentional, not done in good faith, and were substantially groundless and vexatious.”
Because the DA’s office lacked justification for denying the records, Willis’ office must pay attorney fees and litigation expenses to Merchant, her husband, John, and the attorney couple’s paralegal, all of whom worked to get the records, the judge ruled.
The court order noted that Dexter Bond, the Open Records Custodian, was “openly hostile to counsel for Plaintiff, Ms. Merchant, and testified that Ms. Merchant’s requests were handled differently than other requests,” according to Fox News.Bond, who testified that his usual practice was to call a requestor to receive additional information to fulfill requests, indicated that he refused to communicate with Merchant by telephone, the court order stated.This entire case was a mess. You would think that if you were a prosecutor trying to prosecute a presidential candidate to influence the outcome of an election, you would have your you-know-what together.
"While there is no requirement under the ORA for Mr. Bond to call any requestor about a particular request, Mr. Bond's handling of Ms. Merchant's requests in this manner indicates a lack of good faith," the order said. "Defendants’ failures were intentional, not done in good faith, and were substantially groundless and vexatious."
Yet, Willis’ team completely botched this case. The notion that they tried to conceal Willis’ affair with another prosecutor goes to show just how corrupt this office is. It’s good that the judge ruled in Merchant’s favor, but perhaps it is time to start discussing whether Willis should keep her job.
Salty told ya!
#### TWK
BAHHAHAAAAAA
... Uh... Lads? ... They simply recounted the same ballots.
And STILL got the count WRONG... Remember Mr. Rossi's complaint?
And you're forgetting something - the looking-about NOW
with things goes well beyonde yer mate Salty.
The Georgia Board of Elections and the DOJ are involved.
.. So, let's wait for their findings, shall we?
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
... No, the DOJ involvement has nothing to do with Epstein, mate.... Originally Posted by Salty AgainI'm tempted to say "bull-fucking-shit" there. But you are probably right. It is much more likely that they are just doing whatever the fuck Trump wants. So today, it is to go after Fani. Tomorrow it will be the next item on the list. They will get back to Epstein soon, though.
Trump audio tape of his phone call to the GA Secretary of State says it all.... He made more than one... Wanted the fraud claims by the whistleblowers addressed.
The fact that he even made a phone call says more. Originally Posted by VitaMan
I'm tempted to say "bull-fucking-shit" there. But you are probably right. It is much more likely that they are just doing whatever the fuck Trump wants. So today, it is to go after Fani. Tomorrow it will be the next item on the list. They will get back to Epstein soon, though.
The idea that YOU think that WE think that the DOJ has any credibility...in this or any other matter right now....is fucking hysterical.
It completely undermines the validity of your "beliefs" about this.
Same thing with the Georgia Board of Elections. They are just another MAGA weapon being used to further the long term goal of undermining election integrity and causing voter distrust.
Everyone who pays the slightest attention to this knows it.
You do too.
Which makes your relentless promotion of this inexcusable.
You make yourself look far worse than we ever could.
. Originally Posted by Mort Watt
)
... Uh... Lads? ... They simply recounted the same ballots.And the voters got who they voted for, right?
And STILL got the count WRONG... Remember Mr. Rossi's complaint?
And you're forgetting something - the looking-about NOW
with things goes well beyonde yer mate Salty.
The Georgia Board of Elections and the DOJ are involved.
.. So, let's wait for their findings, shall we?
#### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again
Trump audio tape of his phone call to the GA Secretary of State says it all.Aw Man! Don't go side tracking a twisted tale only NaCl-y can do with this stuff!
The fact that he even made a phone call says more. Originally Posted by VitaMan
THIS is me Fourth (4th) Georgia Elections thread.We know. It's nauseating.
... I've surely been REVIEWING all of this for FIVE (5) Years. Originally Posted by Salty Again
... And I got a good idea on what is "bullshit" and what is not. Originally Posted by Salty AgainAgreed! You have more experience posting it here than anyone else, by far.
... So, let's take a look at those ballots - and then we'll see. Originally Posted by Salty AgainNo. The conclusion is forgone. They will NOT prove any fraud. And you will NOT admit it.
